Hi,
On 2018-06-04 19:57, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 29.05.2018, 14:32 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
Hi,
On 2018-05-28 18:12, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.05.2018, 20:13 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> > We have built SCSI as module will it cause any problem to enable
>
Am Dienstag, den 29.05.2018, 14:32 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-05-28 18:12, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 24.05.2018, 20:13 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> > > We have built SCSI as module will it cause any problem to enable
> > > CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC ?
> >
> > N
Hi,
On 2018-05-28 18:12, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.05.2018, 20:13 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
We have built SCSI as module will it cause any problem to enable
CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC ?
No, that should work. But the failure is bizzare. You say
yes there is no problem! I have
Am Donnerstag, den 24.05.2018, 20:13 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> We have built SCSI as module will it cause any problem to enable
> CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC ?
No, that should work. But the failure is bizzare. You say
synchronous scanning fails, but async scan works?
Regards
Oliver,
On 2018-05-17 19:04, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2018, 12:29 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
Those commands issued from different layers say: sd.. uas.. scsi..
so making them to go one after other. Once REPORT_LUN done go with
READ_CAPACITY_16.
This is only for the UAS dev
Manu,
On 2018-05-18 16:10, Manu Gautam wrote:
Hi,
On 4/16/2018 3:47 PM, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
On 2018-04-05 12:39, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
On 2018-04-05 11:24, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Greg KH writes:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaur
Hi,
On 4/16/2018 3:47 PM, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
> On 2018-04-05 12:39, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
>>> On 2018-04-05 11:24, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Greg KH writes:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org
> wrote
Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2018, 12:29 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> Those commands issued from different layers say: sd.. uas.. scsi..
> so making them to go one after other. Once REPORT_LUN done go with
> READ_CAPACITY_16.
> This is only for the UAS devices. I believe no disturb to BOT behavior.
Hi All,
On 2018-04-24 14:42, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Montag, den 23.04.2018, 18:35 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
hi,
On 2018-04-23 18:20, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2018, 20:18 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> No. But for testing we don't need to. Can you confirm that
> th
Am Montag, den 23.04.2018, 18:35 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> hi,
>
> On 2018-04-23 18:20, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2018, 20:18 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> > No. But for testing we don't need to. Can you confirm that
> > the problem is triggered by specific commands?
hi,
On 2018-04-23 18:20, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2018, 20:18 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
On 2018-04-19 14:15, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2018, 12:44 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> > On 2018-04-17 12:03, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I have doubt th
Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2018, 20:18 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> On 2018-04-19 14:15, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2018, 12:44 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> > > On 2018-04-17 12:03, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I have doubt that sequential scan(scsi_sequential
hi,
On 2018-04-04 19:28, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:41:41PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-04 18:07, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > Hi Oliver/Greg,
> >
> > I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16
On 2018-04-19 14:18, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2018, 12:34 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
Oliver/Greg,
Weather you are able to reproduce the issue?
Did you tested it on dwc3 previously?
I don't even have a dwc3.
Great, so uas on dwc3 new to all...
May I suggest that you try t
On 2018-04-19 14:15, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2018, 12:44 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
On 2018-04-17 12:03, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
Hi,
I have doubt that sequential scan(scsi_sequential_lun_scan) work well
for uas device(SCSI>3)..
Why? As I have seen in most cases failed to e
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2018, 12:34 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> Oliver/Greg,
> Weather you are able to reproduce the issue?
> Did you tested it on dwc3 previously?
I don't even have a dwc3.
May I suggest that you try to determine whether the issue
happens on the same SCSI command? We need to kno
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2018, 12:44 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar:
> On 2018-04-17 12:03, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
Hi,
> I have doubt that sequential scan(scsi_sequential_lun_scan) work well
> for uas device(SCSI>3)..
> Why? As I have seen in most cases failed to enumerate during REPORT_LUN
> command.
On 2018-04-17 12:03, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
On 2018-04-16 20:03, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Montag, den 16.04.2018, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > [57246.701096] sd 1:0:0:0: tag#0 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 1
> > > > inflight: CMD IN
> > > > [57246.701130] sd 1:0:0:0: tag#0 CDB: opcode=
On 2018-04-17 18:04, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 17.04.2018 09:23, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
On 2018-04-16 18:46, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 16.04.2018 13:20, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
On 2018-04-05 11:31, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
it would help if you would Cc XHCI's maintainer :-)
tnim...@codeaurora.org wri
On 17.04.2018 09:23, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
On 2018-04-16 18:46, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 16.04.2018 13:20, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
On 2018-04-05 11:31, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
it would help if you would Cc XHCI's maintainer :-)
tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
On 2018-04-04 19:28, Greg KH wrote:
On 2018-04-16 20:03, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Montag, den 16.04.2018, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > [57246.701096] sd 1:0:0:0: tag#0 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 1
> > > > inflight: CMD IN
> > > > [57246.701130] sd 1:0:0:0: tag#0 CDB: opcode=0x1a 1a 00 3f 00 04 00
>
> URB is canceled,
Am Montag, den 16.04.2018, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > > [57246.701096] sd 1:0:0:0: tag#0 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 1
> > > > > inflight: CMD IN
> > > > > [57246.701130] sd 1:0:0:0: tag#0 CDB: opcode=0x1a 1a 00 3f 00 04 00
> >
> > URB is canceled, maybe that URB never finished?
>
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 16.04.2018 13:20, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
> > On 2018-04-05 11:31, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> it would help if you would Cc XHCI's maintainer :-)
> >>
> >> tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
> >>
> >>> On 2018-04-04 19:28, Greg KH wrote:
> O
On 16.04.2018 13:20, Tushar Nimkar wrote:
On 2018-04-05 11:31, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
it would help if you would Cc XHCI's maintainer :-)
tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
On 2018-04-04 19:28, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:41:41PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-0
On 2018-04-05 11:31, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
it would help if you would Cc XHCI's maintainer :-)
tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
On 2018-04-04 19:28, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:41:41PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
On 2018-04-04 18:07, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2
On 2018-04-05 12:39, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
On 2018-04-05 11:24, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Greg KH writes:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
Hi Oliver/Greg,
I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as well.
The behav
Hi,
tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
> On 2018-04-05 11:24, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Greg KH writes:
>>> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org
>>> wrote:
Hi Oliver/Greg,
I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as well.
The behavior is
On 2018-04-05 11:24, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Greg KH writes:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
Hi Oliver/Greg,
I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as well.
The behavior is same new usb device detects and reset after aprox 30
sec(SD_TIMEOUT)
Log
Hi,
it would help if you would Cc XHCI's maintainer :-)
tnim...@codeaurora.org writes:
> On 2018-04-04 19:28, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:41:41PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>> On 2018-04-04 18:07, Greg KH wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...
On 2018-04-04 19:28, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:41:41PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-04 18:07, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > Hi Oliver/Greg,
> >
> > I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as w
Hi,
Greg KH writes:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> Hi Oliver/Greg,
>>
>> I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as well.
>> The behavior is same new usb device detects and reset after aprox 30
>> sec(SD_TIMEOUT)
>> Logs are already shared bel
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:41:41PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-04-04 18:07, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > Hi Oliver/Greg,
> > >
> > > I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as well.
> > > The behavior is s
On 2018-04-04 18:07, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Hi Oliver/Greg,
I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as well.
The behavior is same new usb device detects and reset after aprox 30
sec(SD_TIMEOUT)
Logs are already shared below.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0530, tnim...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hi Oliver/Greg,
>
> I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as well.
> The behavior is same new usb device detects and reset after aprox 30
> sec(SD_TIMEOUT)
> Logs are already shared below.
>
> We are using Synopsys
Hi Oliver/Greg,
I am able to duplicated the UAS issue on 4.16 as well.
The behavior is same new usb device detects and reset after aprox 30
sec(SD_TIMEOUT)
Logs are already shared below.
We are using Synopsys dwc3 as host controller, May I know have tested it
with dwc3?
I have tried it on Lin
35 matches
Mail list logo
