Hurro folks,
I'm looking for some crash-test dummies to test a website of sorts.
It's a link-shrinker/bookmarking service. There is no point, it's a
'because I can' project that I started ages ago and got keep about
recently.
Ideally testers would be people who are into twitter, facebook etc
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:21 PM, yuri yur...@gmail.com wrote:
Aidan Gauland wrote:
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Couples in long distance relationships are being sought to try out a
prototype device designed to communicate intimacy from their bedrooms.
Hands up, those of you who are
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Christopher Sawtell
csawt...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Couples in long distance relationships are being sought to try out a
prototype device designed to communicate intimacy from their bedrooms.
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Couples in long distance relationships are being sought to try out a
prototype device designed to communicate intimacy from their bedrooms.
Hands up, those of you who are wondering if this thing is scriptable!
Aidan Gauland wrote:
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Couples in long distance relationships are being sought to try out a
prototype device designed to communicate intimacy from their bedrooms.
Hands up, those of you who are wondering if this thing is scriptable!
/me raises hand.
Yuri
Greetings,
Couples in long distance relationships are being sought to try out a
prototype device designed to communicate intimacy from their bedrooms.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/highlands_and_islands/8004769.stm
They talk about 100 miles as being long distance.
I think we have
Hi,
If you didn't read the subject and chose to read this message it contains
nothing of any real interest.
Just testing if my sending address is accepted now with a change of
subscription address to the mailing list.
cheers,
Andrew
On Saturday 20 December 2008 15:29:24 Steve Holdoway wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:11:34 +1300
John Mallett mall...@actrix.co.nz wrote:
test
64 bit FC10 and KDE eh??
What's it like (:
Steve
It is not to bad. Quite similar to FC9. Very easy to install especially when
you have broadband
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:25:23 +1300
John Mallett wrote:
User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.7-134.fc10.x86_64; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64;
; )
it's in your mail headers :-)
John
Hello my name is Steve. I'm an addict. Every day I check the headers
on all my email to see what operating systems my friends are using. I
subscribe to 127 mailing lists to feed my habit. I wake at 2.00 am to
keep up with the checking.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:40 PM, John Rye
That's the kind of dedication that we all need for linux.
Oh! and mail checking as well
On Sunday 21 December 2008 10:36:01 Nick Rout wrote:
Hello my name is Steve. I'm an addict. Every day I check the headers
on all my email to see what operating systems my friends are using. I
subscribe
Ssh, don't tell everyone (:
Actually I'm even worse than usual at the moment, as I'm trying to get my mail
server to deliver regularly, first time, to xtra addresses. So, I'm trying to
get SPF, DKIM, and loads of other acronyms working properly. Sadly, even these
fail when connected to one of
Did you see my NZNog post Steve?
Did you get my phone call?
Cheers Don
Steve Holdoway wrote:
Ssh, don't tell everyone (:
Actually I'm even worse than usual at the moment, as I'm trying to get my mail
server to deliver regularly, first time, to xtra addresses. So, I'm trying to
get SPF,
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:50:06 +1300
d...@bowenvale.co.nz wrote:
Did you see my NZNog post Steve?
Did you get my phone call?
Cheers Don
Yes I did thanks Don.
--
Steve Holdoway st...@greengecko.co.nz
test
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:11:34 +1300
John Mallett mall...@actrix.co.nz wrote:
test
64 bit FC10 and KDE eh??
What's it like (:
Steve
--
Steve Holdoway st...@greengecko.co.nz
Hi,
Apologies, but I was having difficulties sending email to the list. Testing
actions with this message.
Regards,
Andrew
Test message, Please ignore.
Checking if my email is getting to list.
Andrew
Hi,
I was at a conference in chicago (www.cluecon.com) and one of the
presenters there asked a question:
Is the following line of code legal?
2[abcde];
Answer to come, after any discussion..
Derek.
--
Derek Smithies Ph.D.
IndraNet Technologies Ltd.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph +64 3
At 2007-07-01T21:28:35+1200, Derek Smithies wrote:
Is the following line of code legal?
2[abcde];
Sure. There's nothing surprising about it, either. Read the section on
array subscripting in the standard to see why.
Cheers,
-mjg
--
Matthew Gregan |/
Looks valid to me, but the real question is why anyone would ever want to? It
would take a pretty disgruntled employee to leave stuff like that for their
successor (:
Well, they wouldn't write code like that if they had to maintain it themselves,
would they?
Steve
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007
Derek Smithies wrote:
Hi,
I was at a conference in chicago (www.cluecon.com) and one of the
presenters there asked a question:
Is the following line of code legal?
2[abcde];
Answer to come, after any discussion..
Derek.
C FAQ, question 6.11
Is the following line of code legal?
2[abcde];
Not for anyone caring about legibility. The string inside the []
translates into a pointer to an array of char. Pointers as array index
aren't right, there should be an offset from the base pointer of the
array, so I'd say, not legal. The 2 is
Hi,
Well, it comes from the management of the square braces.
2[abcde];
is equivalent to (from the compilers point of view) to
*(2 + abcde);
which is
*(abcde + 2);
which is the character 'c';
which is definately legal.
There was general agreement from the discussion on this code that
Is this actually a trick question? Is it valid in C to have a line of
code that just evaluates to b? What sort of statement is that?
I can cope with (if I've got the correct assignment operator):
x = 2[abcde];
but not:
2[abcde];
But I haven't programmed in C since 1990.
Kerry.
At 2007-07-02T12:11:14+1200, Kerry Mayes wrote:
Is this actually a trick question? Is it valid in C to have a line of
code that just evaluates to b? What sort of statement is that?
Yup, it's perfectly legal. If you compile with warnings enabled or check
the source with a lint-like tool,
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:28:35 +1200, Derek Smithies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2[abcde]
=== abcde[2]
== 'c'
Rex
--
Eschew Obfuscation.
On 02/07/07, Derek Smithies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, think carefully. I would suggest that almost any language allows
you to make spaghetti.
I have started to codegolf (codegolf.com) in python. Despite python's
reputation for clarity, you can get some good gnarliness with a bit of
Test message - Please ignore.
Sorry, I'm receiving list messages but was checking ability to send?
Andrew
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:49, Rik Tindall wrote:
feel free 2 bounce this one /
is linux-users[AT]it.canterbury.ac.nz a moderated list?
cheers, rik
Some comments;
Rick , the timestamp from your email client implies that the message was
created before it was processed by the mail servers.
I
Thanks for this heads up Ross,
I've had a number of messages delayed going to different places
recently. It never occured to me.
Cheers Don
Ross Drummond wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:49, Rik Tindall wrote:
feel free 2 bounce this one /
is linux-users[AT]it.canterbury.ac.nz a moderated
Don Gould wrote:
Thanks for this heads up Ross,
I've had a number of messages delayed going to different places
recently. It never occured to me.
Ross Drummond wrote:
Some comments;
Rick , the timestamp from your email client implies that the message
was created before it was processed
feel free 2 bounce this one /
is linux-users[AT]it.canterbury.ac.nz a moderated list?
cheers, rik
Save: ?= $_POST[Save]?
Gives me: Save:
Notice: Undefined index: Save in /var/www/html/o/MACOwner.php on line 15
Clearly I need to test that it's defined first. How do I do that in php?
Cheers Don
--
Don Gould
www.thinkdesignprint.co.nz - www.tcn.bowenvale.co.nz -
www.bowenvale.co.nz
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:10, Don Gould wrote:
Save: ?= $_POST[Save]?
Gives me: Save:
Notice: Undefined index: Save in /var/www/html/o/MACOwner.php on line 15
Clearly I need to test that it's defined first. How do I do that in php?
Cheers Don
There is a NZ PHP users group
Don,
I can recommend 2 excellent books:
PHP in 10 Minutes by SAMS publishing.
Succinct, fast and $cheap. It will answer most of your fundamental
PHP questions with minimum fuss.
2. PHP and MyQL Web Development, Welling Thomson, 3rd Edition,
Developers Library
This is the best tutorial
Thanks Hads...
I'm on that list to.
Cheers Don
Hadley Rich wrote:
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:10, Don Gould wrote:
Save: ?= $_POST[Save]?
Gives me: Save:
Notice: Undefined index: Save in /var/www/html/o/MACOwner.php on line 15
Clearly I need to test that it's defined first. How do
actually go to 'do it' that I realise I don't know how to do
something...
For example, it just never occured to me that I'd have to test the
_POST(x). In ASP if you use a request(x) that doesn't exist it just
ignores you. Not that this makes ASP any better, it's just different.
So as I
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:23, Nicholas Rogers wrote:
Don,
I can recommend 2 excellent books:
PHP in 10 Minutes by SAMS publishing.
Succinct, fast and $cheap. It will answer most of your fundamental
PHP questions with minimum fuss.
2. PHP and MyQL Web Development, Welling Thomson,
ruby rant... last week it was 'Perl is your friend'... :)
Actually Chris, I got a book out on Ruby last week and found it wasn't
the right book (Ruby on Rails), and I got a book out on Perl as well.
Let's get a reality check here for a second...
Most of the *nix language use the same
But the power of php is not in the code, it's in the support libraries that are
already written. So without pear, you might as well use a proper language like
C.
Steve
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:05:11 +1300
Christopher Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:23,
Sorry, but to check whether Steve's solution works, i really have to
test it!
On 10/6/2006, Steve Holdoway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 06:00:28 +1300
Steve Holdoway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've stuck with roundcube, after a suggestion from a lister a while back
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:06:09 +1300 (NZDT)
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but to check whether Steve's solution works, i really have to
test it!
On 10/6/2006, Steve Holdoway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 06:00:28 +1300
Steve Holdoway [EMAIL
On 10/9/2006, Steve Holdoway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope! - it's sending \n\n so we could single them up...
//else, send message
$message = str_replace(\r\n, \n, $message);
$message = str_replace(\n\n, \n, $message);
$message = str_replace(\r\n.\r\n,
I'd like to set up my server to run a speed test every half hour so I
can graph performance.
Does anyone know or a linux system that will do this for me?
Download Speed: 1091 kbps (136.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 130 kbps (16.3 KB/sec transfer rate)
That's my 3.5mbit link!
Cheers
you could:
1. find a speed test that doesn't require flash or java
2. use wget to run the speed test from a cron job
3. parse the results from the document wget downloaded
4. use grace to make charts in the web server document root
your grace script might look like this:
[
#!/bin/sh
USE=$0
On 10/4/2006, Don Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to set up my server to run a speed test every half hour so I
can graph performance.
Does anyone know or a linux system that will do this for me?
Download Speed: 1091 kbps (136.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 130 kbps (16.3
Hey,
Don Gould wrote:
I'd like to set up my server to run a speed test every half hour so I
can graph performance.
Does anyone know or a linux system that will do this for me?
Download Speed: 1091 kbps (136.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 130 kbps (16.3 KB/sec transfer rate
Nick Rout wrote:
Those are pretty typical speeds from what I understand. I also understand
that the quoted 3.5M is _not_ guaranteed.
...and never delivered?!
--
Don Gould
www.thinkdesignprint.co.nz - www.tcn.bowenvale.co.nz -
www.bowenvale.co.nz - www.hearingbooks.co.nz - SkypeMe:
Glynn Foster wrote:
Download Speed: 1360 kbps (170 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 130 kbps (16.3 KB/sec transfer rate)
If 1.5mbit is all they're going to delivery for $49 while they quote 3.5
then I think I should pay them the for the percentage they deliver.
Sounds fair to me.
Cheers
On Thursday 05 October 2006 12:11, Don Gould wrote:
Download Speed: 1360 kbps (170 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 130 kbps (16.3 KB/sec transfer rate)
If 1.5mbit is all they're going to delivery for $49 while they quote 3.5
then I think I should pay them the for the percentage they
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:44:18 +1200
Andrew Errington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we all agree that if we are *all* going to check and log the speed that
we do it at different times...
Andrew
I'd say exactly the opposite, personally (:
Steve
On Thursday 05 October 2006 09:33, Nick Rout wrote:
On 10/4/2006, Don Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Download Speed: 1091 kbps (136.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 130 kbps (16.3 KB/sec transfer rate)
That's my 3.5mbit link!
Those are pretty typical speeds from what I understand. I
Andrew Errington wrote:
Can we all agree that if we are *all* going to check and log the speed that
we do it at different times...
Yes, I've been giving this some thought. I'm going to look into a
solution a bit further. Neil posted some good code last night, I think
it would be a really
Quick test to see whether it's now safe to set Out of Office at my
end. If not I'll change to gmail completly for the list. - steve
Hi,
thanks to Simon Knight, and Matthew Gregan who replied offlist with some
pointers.
Matthew pointed out that the created threads were not being cleaned up
properly. I had to either detach the threads, or do a pthread_join of the
thread.
With that change, the test program ran a lot better
Hi,
I have been having some memory errors in a C++ program, which has been run
on my quad cpu box here (FC1). It has been complaining about errors in
malloc_consolidate. Nasty stuff this, whats going on.
So, I cut it down to the minimum, wrote a test application.
compiled with:
gcc -g -o
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
Now, how do i turn a url like:
http://server.com/path/to/sourcefile-2.3.4.tar.bz
into just the filename like this:
sourcefile-2.3.4.tar.bz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat urls
Perl is unnecessary for this. There is the basename utility:
basename http://server.com/path/to/sourcefile-2.3.4.tar.bz
yields
sourcefile-2.3.4.tar.bz
or, for the full functionality of the perl script:
for f in $(cat urls); do basename $f; done
Sources.bz2
Packages.bz2
Hola !
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:50:25PM +1300, Carl Cerecke wrote:
Perl is unnecessary for this. There is the basename utility:
Yes, I agree but it was about giving and reading the different options
:)
I prefer this to the perl line-noise incantation :-)
heh I like the noise.
The same base
in bash, I thought it was something like:
if [ test -f /path/to/blah ] ; then
but I get:
line 46: [: -f: binary operator expected
--
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:34:07PM +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
in bash, I thought it was something like:
if [ test -f /path/to/blah ] ; then
but I get:
line 46: [: -f: binary operator expected
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ if [ -f /etc/passwd ] ; then echo si; fi
si
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ if test -f
thought it was something like:
if [ test -f /path/to/blah ] ; then
but I get:
line 46: [: -f: binary operator expected
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ if [ -f /etc/passwd ] ; then echo si; fi
si
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ if test -f /etc/passwd; then echo si; fi
si
Hope it helps
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:49:59 +1300
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent, thanks
Now, how do i turn a url like:
http://server.com/path/to/sourcefile-2.3.4.tar.bz
into just the filename like this:
sourcefile-2.3.4.tar.bz
file=`echo $url | sed 's?^.*/??'`
Steve
I thought of that, but what if the url is:
http://server.com/longer/annoying/path/to/sourcefile.2.3.4.tar.bz
In other words, if the length of the path is unpredictable :(
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:56:29 +1300
David Mann wrote:
Use cut with a specified delimiter, eg:
echo
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 05:00:35PM +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
http://server.com/longer/annoying/path/to/sourcefile.2.3.4.tar.bz
$ basename http://server.com/longer/annoying/path/to/sourcefile.2.3.4.tar.bz
sourcefile.2.3.4.tar.bz
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:59:42 +1300
Steve Holdoway wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:49:59 +1300
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent, thanks
Now, how do i turn a url like:
http://server.com/path/to/sourcefile-2.3.4.tar.bz
into just the filename like this:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:05, Nick Rout wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:59:42 +1300
Steve Holdoway wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:49:59 +1300
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent, thanks
Now, how do i turn a url like:
http://server.com/path/to/sourcefile-2.3.4.tar.bz
Hadley Rich wrote:
No it wasn't. The last speaker didn't mention it at all (mostly
javascript),
So there's a difference?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX
?
Between Java and Javascript? Yes.
hads
Where I went wrong was believing Philip Lindsay's AJAX slide had read
Nick Rout wrote:
Another plug I know, but I can also say that i've only been able to get most
media to
play since I used gentoo.
A noteworthy corollary from last night's NZCS meeting:
The hyper-informed Chris Noel (tho unknown to CLUG; I have yet to master
an umlaut e in Lnx, sorry), spoke
On 10/28/05, Richard Tindall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Rout wrote:Another plug I know, but I can also say that i've only been able to get most media to
play since I used gentoo.A noteworthy corollary from last night's NZCS meeting:The hyper-informed Chris Noel (tho unknown to CLUG; ...
He was
On 28/10/05, Richard Tindall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall, the meeting was _very_ strong on Java.
No it wasn't. The last speaker didn't mention it at all (mostly
javascript), and the second speaker barely touched it (mostly python),
if at all. The other two were Java-heavy - but they
Carl Cerecke wrote:
Overall, the meeting was _very_ strong on Java.
No it wasn't. The last speaker didn't mention it at all (mostly
javascript),
So there's a difference?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX
Volker was there. He took notes. He could give a more accurate summary.
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:06, Richard Tindall wrote:
No it wasn't. The last speaker didn't mention it at all (mostly
javascript),
So there's a difference?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX
?
Between Java and Javascript? Yes.
hads
--
Here I am, fifty-eight, and I still don't know what
On 28/10/05, Richard Tindall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl Cerecke wrote:
Overall, the meeting was _very_ strong on Java.
No it wasn't. The last speaker didn't mention it at all (mostly
javascript),
So there's a difference?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX
Follow the Javascript
as the backend for Totem -
out of the box - FreeBSD plays the test mpg Ubuntu doesn't. So you
have been helpful in showing what makes the difference, so that Ubuntu's
gstreamer can be tweaked up to FreeBSD's delivery standard. Before this,
the solution I have found and passed onto others
want to install arts.
The point of the exercise is to find out where the most useable given
solutions most readily are. With gstreamer as the backend for Totem -
out of the box - FreeBSD plays the test mpg Ubuntu doesn't. So you
have been helpful in showing what makes the difference, so
the
Ubuntu 5.04 version did not (until Xine substituted in). Will test
Ubuntu 5.10 asap.
which videoclips did not play with ubuntu and what codecs did they use?
there's a short of 'Revolution O/S' on the SFD'04 OpenCD: REV_OS_trailer.mpg
it runs with totem/xine (but not totem
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:56:05 +1300
Richard Tindall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That worked, i can confirm that the FreeBSD 5.4 Totem with Gstreamer
does play video clips as packaged, where the
Ubuntu 5.04 version did not (until Xine substituted in). Will test
Ubuntu 5.10 asap.
which
the
Ubuntu 5.04 version did not (until Xine substituted in). Will test
Ubuntu 5.10 asap.
Later,
Rik
Andrew Turner wrote:
Try
mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /cdrom
ah! -t
I'll try that again then.
Thanks Andrew.
The FreeBSD mount will assume you are mounting a UFS file system. When
the super block is incorrect it complains.
Devices on FreeBSD are automatically created and deleted with devfs.
Hi folks,
Is there some reason I am unable to..
P3-600-FreeBSD# mount /dev/acd0 /cdrom/
mount: /dev/acd0 on /cdrom: incorrect super block
It's a Linux CD, 2 tried so far. Have been able to play a music CD
already, installed from the drive (it's good).
Is there a /dev/?(music) to be deleted?
Richard Tindall wrote:
Hi folks,
Is there some reason I am unable to..
P3-600-FreeBSD# mount /dev/acd0 /cdrom/
mount: /dev/acd0 on /cdrom: incorrect super block
Try
mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /cdrom
The FreeBSD mount will assume you are mounting a UFS file system. When
the super block is
Nick Rout wrote:
now it is wrong again:
As expected, but why then does this line look correct?
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:18 +, Richard Tindall wrote:
what part of the gentoo instructions *did* you actually follow?
Which answer do you want, the obvious one - it's working, isn't it? - or
Richard Tindall wrote:
Wed May 11 17:15:06 UTC 2005
bash-2.05b$ date
Please tell me what's wrong with this; it doesn't say GMT.
UTC *is* GMT.
may have word wrapped )
As a test I created a link to somewhere that doesn't exist, it flashed red.
Col.
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:03 +, Richard Tindall wrote:
As expected, but why then does this line look correct?
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:18 +, Richard Tindall wrote:
^
it doesn't look right Rik, your whole post is based on it being right,
but it is
From my rc.conf, unamended (thanks Col, getting there.. ):
# Set CLOCK to UTC if your system clock is set to UTC (also known as
# Greenwich Mean Time). If your clock is set to the local time, then
set CLOCK
# to local. This setting is used by the /etc/init.d/clock script.
#CLOCK=UTC = original
* -l
snip
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root36 May 12 07:13 localtime -
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Pacific/Auckland
Now to reboot, I guess.
Next test should be right. Thanks for the pointers guys. Just
misunderstood instructions.
Cheers,
Rik
--
Richard Tindall, InfoHelp Services http://www.infohelp.co.nz
Nick Rout wrote:
finally make sure the clock run script is set to run on boot:
rc-update add clock boot
bash-2.05b# rc-update add clock boot
* clock already installed in runlevel boot; skipping
reboot
Cheers.
bash-2.05b$ /sbin/hwclock -r
hwclock is unable to get I/O port access: the iopl(3)
Robert Fisher wrote:
Rik, I know it has been said before but it seems that you are past the
install stage so Gentoo should be soo easy for you now.
Not really. The tweaks involve reading thought time I often don't
have. So I'll stick with Ububtu by default (it runs all devices the best
Steve Holdoway wrote:
... would nearly be an acceptable answer?
(:
My desktop has 10 May, 18:xxpm showing.. But Mozilla mail Inbox lists
incoming as 12 hours earlier (eg 6.xx).
Oops! Sorry, back when it's fixed..
Thanks for warning me.
Rik
--
Richard Tindall, InfoHelp Services
Richard Tindall wrote:
Robert Fisher wrote:
Rik, I know it has been said before but it seems that you are past
the install stage so Gentoo should be soo easy for you now.
Not really. The tweaks involve reading thought time I often don't
have. So I'll stick with Ububtu by default (it runs
On Wed, 11 May 2005 06:21, Richard Tindall wrote:
Steve Holdoway wrote:
... would nearly be an acceptable answer?
(:
My desktop has 10 May, 18:xxpm showing.. But Mozilla mail Inbox lists
incoming as 12 hours earlier (eg 6.xx).
please can you tell us the o/p of the following
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 06:21, Richard Tindall wrote:
Steve Holdoway wrote:
... would nearly be an acceptable answer?
(:
My desktop has 10 May, 18:xxpm showing.. But Mozilla mail Inbox lists
incoming as 12 hours earlier (eg 6.xx).
please can you tell
On Wed, 11 May 2005 06:18, Steve Holdoway wrote:
.. isn't there an emerge ntpdate or ntpd available?
Yes there is.
See...
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=41099
--
Robert Fisher
(aka - Rob, Bob, Robbie, Robbo, Fish)
FishNet Computer Services
www.fisher.net.nz
On Wed, 11 May 2005 06:38, Robert Fisher wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 06:18, Steve Holdoway wrote:
.. isn't there an emerge ntpdate or ntpd available?
Yes there is.
See...
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=41099
But the problem with that is that it just masks the
problem,
Cheers Chris,
I will have to reply on Gentoo, from earlier in the thread; it's
starting now..
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 06:21, Richard Tindall wrote:
Steve Holdoway wrote:
... would nearly be an acceptable answer?
(:
please can you tell us the o/p of the
Here tis Chris,
Steve Holdoway wrote:
...clock's still wrong, though (:
bash-2.05b$ ls -l /etc/localtime
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2 Apr 9 13:35 /etc/localtime - NZ
[NB /etc/localtime NZ are flashing in a red block]
bash-2.05b$ /sbin/hwclock -r
hwclock is unable to get I/O port access: the
Rik, that is looking fine now:
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:07 +1200, Richard Tindall wrote:
Cheers Chris,
I will have to reply on Gentoo, from earlier in the thread; it's
starting now..
Having spoken with you and Caleb at CLUG, I'm reminded that all of my
clock problems have been on KDE -
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
