Re: Mozilla mail question

2003-01-10 Thread kwall
Feigning erudition, Susan Macchia wrote: % Hi all, % % I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla % much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook % html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real %

Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header

2003-01-10 Thread Stuart Biggerstaff
And one more thing... On the one list I'm on where a reply-to goes to the sender instead of the list you have to anticipate getting at least eight out-of-office auto-replies and undeliverable mail notifications. And no one does anything about it, because it's more trouble than it's worth to

Re: Mozilla mail question

2003-01-10 Thread Jason Joines
Susan Macchia wrote: Hi all, Before I state my problem, I want to apologize for this not being a linux only question. But I thought that some of you might have experienced this problem. Ok, here goes: At my job most folks use MS Outlook for email and generally format their email in HTML. I

Re: mtrr setup?

2003-01-10 Thread David A. Bandel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 11:56:35 -0500 begin Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: reg00: base=0x ( 0MB),

Re: Mozilla mail question

2003-01-10 Thread Stuart Biggerstaff
Probably pretty close, but I would suspect other standards-based clients (Outlook Express, Eudora) would get the same result. Exchange probably (intelligently - ha ha) strips the out the proprietary code in messages accessed by a POP client. Mozilla probably never gets the chance to decode

Re: mtrr setup?

2003-01-10 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, David A. Bandel wrote: On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 11:56:35 -0500 begin Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: reg00: base=0x ( 0MB),

Re: another small problem with networking

2003-01-10 Thread David A. Bandel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 07:57:00 +1000 begin Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: At 05:55 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote: If you want to know how to put both Win boxes on the same subnet using the bridge tools, let me know and I'll

Re: Linux 2.5.54... a treat!

2003-01-10 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Thursday 09 January 2003 0:20 am, Jerry McBride wrote: I've got it on my home lan and my personal lapop. We'll see just how good it is for that purpose... it is beta, but so far it looks ok. As for performance, it seems like all the previous builds. Hmm... just got a message, 2.5.55 is

Re: mtrr setup?

2003-01-10 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: If you don't have an entry that seems to match your video card's memory, it's almost certainly not optimized. What version of X are you running? Perhaps you need to upgrade? Or maybe

rsync without a shell

2003-01-10 Thread Net Llama!
I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents the rsync from running, as it fails with this error: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data

Re: rsync without a shell

2003-01-10 Thread Andrew Mathews
Net Llama! wrote: I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents the rsync from running, as it fails with this error: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in

Re: rsync without a shell

2003-01-10 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andrew Mathews wrote: Net Llama! wrote: I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents the rsync from running, as it fails with this error: rsync: connection unexpectedly

my printer may have died

2003-01-10 Thread Bonez
Help: I went to print to my trusty HP laser jet iii and it stopped responding. I am not sure if I have sent it some weird command that makes it not talk to my system any more (caldera 3.1) but it has printed fine for the past several months. Now, neither Windows nor Linux will print to it.

Re: rsync without a shell

2003-01-10 Thread Andrew Mathews
Net Llama! wrote: On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andrew Mathews wrote: Net Llama! wrote: I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents the rsync from running, as it fails with this error: rsync: connection

Re: my printer may have died

2003-01-10 Thread Aaron Grewell
Wow, I've never heard of anyone being able to kill an LJIII. They are some of the most indestructible printers I've ever seen. The easiest way (once you've printed a test page to make sure the printer isn't well and truly dead) is to plug it into a different machine. Use a different cable as

Re: my printer may have died

2003-01-10 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 10 January 2003 18:11 pm, Aaron Grewell wrote: Wow, I've never heard of anyone being able to kill an LJIII. They are some of the most indestructible printers I've ever seen. The easiest way (once you've printed a test page to make sure the printer isn't well and truly dead) is to

Re: rsync without a shell

2003-01-10 Thread Federico Voges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:20:12 -0500 (EST), Net Llama! wrote: I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents the rsync from running, as it fails with this

Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header

2003-01-10 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Yes, I used the L key but the frustration for me was that 99.98% of my lists responded to clicking on the reply button and filled out the reply to correctly. Not two of them - they used the lame excuse (maybe one day I'll really express my feelings on this subject G) of mailboxes filling up

Re: another small problem with networking

2003-01-10 Thread Collins
[ snips ] On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:42:26 -0500 David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 07:57:00 +1000 begin Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: At 05:55 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote: If you want to know how to put both Win boxes on the same subnet

Re: Linux 2.5.54... a treat!

2003-01-10 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 10 January 2003 21:48 pm, Jerry McBride wrote: On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:55:26 -0500 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 09 January 2003 0:20 am, Jerry McBride wrote: I've got it on my home lan and my personal lapop. We'll see just how good it is for that

Re: mtrr setup?

2003-01-10 Thread Tim Wunder
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 8:43 pm, someone claiming to be David A. Bandel wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:56:37 -0500 snip reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1 reg01: base=0xe400 (3648MB), size= 64MB: write-combining, count=1 reg02: base=0xdc00 (3520MB),

Re: Linux 2.5.54... a treat!

2003-01-10 Thread Jerry McBride
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:55:26 -0500 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 09 January 2003 0:20 am, Jerry McBride wrote: I've got it on my home lan and my personal lapop. We'll see just how good it is for that purpose... it is beta, but so far it looks ok. As for performance,

Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header

2003-01-10 Thread Collins
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:22:09 -0500 Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not two of them - they used the lame excuse (maybe one day I'll really express my feelings on this subject G) of mailboxes filling up and bouncing back so we'll mess up the reply to headers! This is much the same

Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header

2003-01-10 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:28:21 -0700 Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:22:09 -0500 Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mailboxes filling up and bouncing back so we'll mess up the reply to headers! This is much the same as the emacs vs. anything else wars,

Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header

2003-01-10 Thread Tim Wunder
On Friday 10 January 2003 9:22 pm, someone claiming to be Brett I. Holcomb wrote: Yes, I used the L key but the frustration for me was that 99.98% of my lists responded to clicking on the reply button and filled out the reply to correctly. Not two of them - ... snip You're on 1 mailing

Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header

2003-01-10 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
It feels like it sometimes G. Not that many by a long shot. You want to get deluge - join openoffice users! On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:07:31 -0500 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 10 January 2003 9:22 pm, someone claiming to be Brett I. Holcomb wrote: Yes, I used the L key but

Re: mtrr setup?

2003-01-10 Thread kwall
Feigning erudition, Douglas J Hunley wrote: % -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- % Hash: SHA1 % % David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: % If you don't have an entry that seems to match your video card's memory, % it's almost certainly not optimized. What version of X

Re: my printer may have died

2003-01-10 Thread kwall
Feigning erudition, Bonez wrote: % Help: % % I went to print to my trusty HP laser jet iii and it stopped responding. What's changed between the last successful print session and now? [...] Kurt -- Shaw's Principle: Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will want

Re: linux firewire recommendations

2003-01-10 Thread Javier Hernandez
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Collins wrote: Anyone familiar with linux/fireware/adapters etc.? I'm looking to attach my JVC DVL805 camcorder to my linux box. Obviously I will need to add a firewire adapter to the box and software. I would love to hear your suggestions Hi Collins, You could take a