TAB
James McDonald
Systems Engineer
Public key (824785B3) available at http://www.keyserver.net/
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Gentle Readers,
OK, I give up. This is incredibly annoying behavior and I'd appreciate it
if anyone knows how/where to configure this. I've submitted bug after bug
to Mozilla (Bugzilla) about this, but it's still not fixed:
When I go to a web page requiring a login, the login box pops up
David,
When I go to a web page requiring a login, the login box pops
up (not the
problem). I enter:
myusernameEnter
then expect to enter my password, but the bloody thing
disappears, gives
me an error message that I gave it the wrong password (I
HAVEN'T ENTERED
MY @#$%$%@$ PASSWORD
Anyone know how to make it behave correctly? (usernameEnter
passwordEnter)?
usernameTABpasswordENTER
I think thats how it is setup to work and yes it lame...
regards-
Jim
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc
On 9/25/2002 1:23 PM, someone claiming to be David A. Bandel wrote:
Gentle Readers,
OK, I give up. This is incredibly annoying behavior and I'd appreciate it
if anyone knows how/where to configure this. I've submitted bug after bug
to Mozilla (Bugzilla) about this, but it's still not
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
Gentle Readers,
OK, I give up. This is incredibly annoying behavior and I'd appreciate it
if anyone knows how/where to configure this. I've submitted bug after bug
to Mozilla (Bugzilla) about this, but it's still not fixed:
When I go to a web
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
With IE 5.5 and netscape 4.75, (windows), this is how it
works, too. Gotta
use the tab button. Same goes for other applications I have
to log on to.
It annoys me, too, because obviously the form is not complete
after entering
the user
-Original Message-
From: David A. Bandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've been logging into UNIX boxes for over 15 years. It's
always been:
usernameEnter
passwordEnter
So, you meant the command line interface, instead of the GUI interface.
Well of course, that is
Funny... As you say, the command line UNIX login is and always has been
usernameEnter passwordEnter: the same for Microsoft's DOS network
client too, by the way. It's been long enough since I did Novell, that I
don't remember in the graphical login screen whether going from username to
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:36:57 -0700
begin Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
-Original Message-
From: David A. Bandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've been logging into UNIX boxes for over 15 years. It's
always been:
usernameEnter
passwordEnter
So, you
David,
I _am_ talking GUI. As I said, Netscape 4.x has the correct (for me)
behavior. Why should a form that requires two inputs submit
after one?
It requires a username then it requires a password, then, and
only then,
should it submit a form. It should not submit if the active box
the standard way to move between fields was and is TAB key.
Even in the days of Foxpro and IBM 3270 terminals, it was and is the
tab key. IN IBM termianl world, ENTER means submit or refresh.
I've been logging into UNIX boxes for over 15 years. It's always been:
usernameEnter
Since when has foxpro been a standard of anything?
m.w.chang wrote:
the standard way to move between fields was and is TAB key.
Even in the days of Foxpro and IBM 3270 terminals, it was and is the
tab key. IN IBM termianl world, ENTER means submit or refresh.
I've been logging into
foxpro was following standard and is the posisbly the most successful
dBase dialect after the romance of the 3 kingdoms (Fox Software,
Ashton-Tate and Nantucket). The TAB was always the key to move between
field. Even in nCurse, I believe...
I barely remembered that there was a SAA (System
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:24:05 -0700
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
Since when has foxpro been a standard of anything?
m.w.chang wrote:
the standard way to move between fields was and is TAB key.
Even in the days of Foxpro and IBM 3270 terminals, it was and is the
David A. Bandel wrote:
Screw it, I'll uninstall X. I just need a way to open a dozen VTs on one
console so I can cut-n-paste between them.
screen?
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux
well, mozilla should have added the OKCANCEL buttons to the login
prompt. Then users may automagically use the tab key since they see the
buttons and know that it's not a text-mode console login.
Anyway, I alawys use TAB since 10 years ago whenever I saw more than one
field on the screen.
Which have you found works well with it? I have tried Suns 1.4JRE version,
but it crashes Mozilla.
TIA
Harry G
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
I use Blackdown 1.3.1 without crashing.
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:28:21 -0400
Harry G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which have you found works well with it? I have tried Suns 1.4JRE
version, but it crashes Mozilla.
TIA
Harry G
___
Linux-users
it twice from within. But from without it refuses. Tabbed
browsing only works from within the app.
Where is -remoteURL(foo) documented? I've now seen 4 different versions
of this sort of option and can't find the real deal anywhere? I'd like to
RTFM if I could find one.
As of Mozilla 1.0
browsing only works from within the app.
Where is -remoteURL(foo) documented? I've now seen 4 different
versions of this sort of option and can't find the real deal
anywhere? I'd like to RTFM if I could find one.
As of Mozilla 1.0, this is different. The command is:
mozilla -remote
I doubt redhat 7.3 has mozilla 1.0. It was just released. That is when
the problem started. It was different in 0,99.
the new_window thing just makes each link open a new window - but it is
the same mozilla. Without this option, each link replaces the current one.
This is a matter of preference
now seen 4 different
versions of this sort of option and can't find the real deal anywhere?
I'd like to RTFM if I could find one.
As of Mozilla 1.0, this is different. The command is:
mozilla -remote openurl(%s,new-window)
replacing %s with whatever gets the name of the url you want
Probably not everyone will agree, but I deem this to be a showstopper
BugFeature (tm) in Mozilla 1.0.
Seems they have intentionally made it so that multiple instances of the
browser cannot be run. So simply clicking on a link in Kmail to bring up a
second window won't work. Or even just
- Original Message -
From: Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:18 PM
Subject: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature
Is there any other worthwhile choice other than Opera?
Try Galeon.
Mike
Also sprach Michael Hipp:
Probably not everyone will agree, but I deem this to be a showstopper
BugFeature (tm) in Mozilla 1.0.
Seems they have intentionally made it so that multiple instances of
the browser cannot be run. So simply clicking on a link in Kmail to
bring up a second window
Also sprach Kurt Wall:
Why would you want to run a second instance as the same user? Why not
just enabled tabbed browsing and configure other apps to use
mozilla -remoteURL(foo)? Mozilla's enough of a porker as it is
without running two instances.
Err, I meant mozilla -remote 'openURL(%s)'
not everyone will agree, but I deem this to be a showstopper
BugFeature (tm) in Mozilla 1.0.
Seems they have intentionally made it so that multiple instances of
the browser cannot be run. So simply clicking on a link in Kmail to
bring up a second window won't work. Or even just running
to be.
Joel Hammer wrote:
With all the hoopala about Mozilla 1.0, has anyone heard if they
have solved that crippling bug which crashes mozilla when it is
running on a remote terminal?
If they haven't, why is anyone celebrating? Why was 1.0 released
On Sun, 09 Jun 2002 15:56:18 -0700 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Its *flash* we're talking about here. Show me one website where a
flash animation is being employed in a useful fasion, rather than as
just eye candy.
I'm sure Flash animations exist that are used for edifying,
Galeon FYI: For those on Redhat7.3 (and maybe elsewhere?) who installed
mozilla 1.0 from the mozilla-installer, the Galeon rpm for redhat from
sourceforge, version 1.2.5, works when installed using --nodeps. (On my
machine it couldn't see mozilla 1.0)
--
Ken Moffat
kmoffat(nospam)drizzle.com
wrote:
With all the hoopala about Mozilla 1.0, has anyone heard if they
have solved that crippling bug which crashes mozilla when it is
running on a remote terminal?
If they haven't, why is anyone celebrating? Why was 1.0 released
On Sunday 09 June 2002 06:53 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Snip ... but it was also time
to release Mozilla. It's a much nicer critter now than it used to be.
Boy howdy. I first used Mozilla at M14. It is now a far cry from what it was
then. If it improves over the next 2 years as much as it improved
Except when I try to forward a link galeon vanishes.
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 17:26:08 -0700
Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Galeon FYI: For those on Redhat7.3 (and maybe elsewhere?) who
installed mozilla 1.0 from the mozilla-installer, the Galeon rpm for
redhat from sourceforge, version
On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 20:00:07 -0700 Net Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Mathews wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
I've been using Mozilla for about 18 months. I have no clue
about what you're afraid of. Its, by far, the most stable, full
featured browser out there, bar none.,
snip
On Sat, 08 Jun 2002 18:59:24 +0800 M.W.Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
no, you don't/didn't understand. that 15M of bloat is for reading
chinese and other languages. how could you twist other governments and
races to read english only?
World domination. ;-)
I like english, too. But there
M.W.Chang wrote:
no, you don't/didn't understand. that 15M of bloat is for reading
chinese and other languages. how could you twist other governments and
races to read english only?
sorry, but i don't buy that. I've compiled Mozilla from source without
all of the foreign language support,
On Sat, 08 Jun 2002 17:15:54 -0700 Net Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M.W.Chang wrote:
no, you don't/didn't understand. that 15M of bloat is for reading
chinese and other languages. how could you twist other governments
and races to read english only?
sorry, but i don't buy that.
I see... if you read Mr. Lamma's reply carefully, he didn't use
mozilla.mail-news but mozilla.browser, I am the opposite.
--
may the force, the farce and linux be with you.
See you in news://news.hkpcug.org and http://www.linux-sxs.org
___
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, m.w.chang wrote:
I see... if you read Mr. Lamma's reply carefully, he didn't use
mozilla.mail-news but mozilla.browser, I am the opposite.
I use Mozilla for mail news a bit at home. Other than the occasionaly
weirdness shutting it down with my IMAP folders, it works quite
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:30:02 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, m.w.chang wrote:
note the word Messenger, not the browser.. :) I am using IE6 most of
the time.
what the fsck is messenger??
The
The name came about with the introduction of the Communicator series,
IIRC. That was when they started including Collabra (a newsreader that
had been a separate product). They used the Messenger name to
differentiate Mail from the Collabra Newsreader. Of course, all that
code got chucked, so
Starting from scrach is hard. making SP and patches are easier. I wonder
whether there would be a Java version of Mozilla... :)
You mis-understood. I am using IE6 browser but Netscape messenger. OE is
a piece of dirt. I may dump IE6 for Mozilla 2.0... very mich depends on
Mozilla-2.0?? You do
netscape.mail-news was called messenger(NOT AOL messeger)
Net Llama! wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, m.w.chang wrote:
note the word Messenger, not the browser.. :) I am using IE6 most of
the time.
what the fsck is messenger??
--
may the force, the farce and linux be with you.
See you in
Appears to be released,
http://www.mozilla.org
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Now we have to wait for a new galeon.
On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 15:03:49 -0400
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Appears to be released,
http://www.mozilla.org
___
Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
I prefer release 1.1 before I switch all over... too risky given the
fact that I knew some of the bugs in her pre-releasses.
Tim Wunder wrote:
Appears to be released,
http://www.mozilla.org
--
may the force, the farce and linux be with you.
See you in news://news.hkpcug.org and
I've been using Mozilla for about 18 months. I have no clue about what
you're afraid of. Its, by far, the most stable, full featured browser
out there, bar none.,
m.w.chang wrote:
I prefer release 1.1 before I switch all over... too risky given the
fact that I knew some of the bugs in her
I haven't used the linux version of mozilla yet. So it may be different
from the experiecnes I had with the Window$ release. Messenger 4.79 is
basically rock stable... so I am worrying about message base
corruption (didn't happen to me so far) and possibly mail filters
failure (there were
m.w.chang wrote:
I haven't used the linux version of mozilla yet. So it may be different
from the experiecnes I had with the Window$ release. Messenger 4.79 is
basically rock stable... so I am worrying about message base
corruption (didn't happen to me so far) and possibly mail filters
Net Llama! wrote:
I've been using Mozilla for about 18 months. I have no clue about what
you're afraid of. Its, by far, the most stable, full featured browser
out there, bar none.,
snip
As an aside, I've been trying Netscape 7.0 for the last week. It seems
to work quite well, no crashes,
Andrew Mathews wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
I've been using Mozilla for about 18 months. I have no clue about
what you're afraid of. Its, by far, the most stable, full featured
browser out there, bar none.,
snip
As an aside, I've been trying Netscape 7.0 for the last week. It seems
search http://www.bugzilla.org and you may find out more. the network
timeout is also one problem I hit once a while with mozilla messenger
when reading news/mail.
Net Llama! wrote:
yea i've experienced that too at times. it seems to be somewthing
related to IMAP low bandwidth
note the word Messenger, not the browser.. :) I am using IE6 most of
the time.
Just wanna be cautious... Did you notice any scroll-bar related errors
in the U.I.? I did... and I worried that those unfixed U.I. bugs could
crash the mozilla suddenly, causing data errors on my many-years-old
On Thursday 06 June 2002 01:29 am, m.w.chang wrote:
note the word Messenger, not the browser.. :) I am using IE6 most of
the time.
Um, IE6 isn't a mail client. What I hear you saying is that you don't use
Mozilla becasuse of the mail client. What mail client comes with IE6? Outlook
Express?
55 matches
Mail list logo
