And one more thing...
On the one list I'm on where a reply-to goes to the sender instead of the
list you have to anticipate getting at least eight out-of-office
auto-replies and undeliverable mail notifications. And no one does
anything about it, because it's more trouble than it's worth to
Yes, I used the L key but the frustration for me was that 99.98% of my lists responded
to clicking on the reply button and filled out the reply to correctly. Not two of
them - they used the lame excuse (maybe one day I'll really express my feelings on
this subject G) of mailboxes filling up
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:22:09 -0500
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not two of them - they used the lame excuse
(maybe one day I'll really express my feelings on this subject G) of
mailboxes filling up and bouncing back so we'll mess up the reply to
headers!
This is much the same
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:28:21 -0700
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:22:09 -0500
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mailboxes filling up and bouncing back so we'll mess up the reply to
headers!
This is much the same as the emacs vs. anything else wars,
On Friday 10 January 2003 9:22 pm, someone claiming to be Brett I. Holcomb
wrote:
Yes, I used the L key but the frustration for me was that 99.98% of my
lists responded to clicking on the reply button and filled out the reply to
correctly. Not two of them - ...
snip
You're on 1 mailing
It feels like it sometimes G. Not that many by a long shot. You want to get deluge
- join openoffice users!
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:07:31 -0500
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 10 January 2003 9:22 pm, someone claiming to be Brett I. Holcomb
wrote:
Yes, I used the L key but
Say, Doug, would you mind fixing the Reply-To: that Mailman puts on
messages to the list? Currently, it is
Reply-To: General Linux discussion and help [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is the same as the List-Id: header:
List-Id: General Linux discussion and help linux-users.linux-sxs.org
Thanks,
On 01/09/03 16:38, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:35:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say, Doug, would you mind fixing the Reply-To: that Mailman puts on
messages to the list? Currently, it is
Reply-To: General Linux discussion and help [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is the
[ snips ]
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:00:43 -0500
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I *much* prefer having the Reply To set. I *hate* having to
Reply All to get my replies to the list (gnucash's mailing lists are
like that, as is the local BaltoLUG's list).
FYI, Sylpheed can decode the
Yes, Sylpheed does a good job but I had to put the list's address in
properties/default to make it work. However, many of us check lists via webmail and
if some idiot, er excuse me administrator, sets the list up so we can't reply to it we
have to A) remember it or b) find someplace in the
On Thursday 09 January 2003 9:43 pm, someone claiming to be Brett I. Holcomb
wrote:
snip
Going to Sylpheed from Kmail (and I'm not looking back G) helped but not
everyone runs Sylpheed. As Lonnie said - it's a convience for list admins,
not the users.
snip
Well, upon further review, kmail
11 matches
Mail list logo
