I see that more and more stuff will require gcc 3.3 and I've been
running gcc 2.95.2. So can someone tell me what potential problems I
might have if I install 3.3. Specifically
a) will 3.3 prevent me from now making small changes in my 2.4.4 kernel
previously compiled with 2.95.2?
b) Will I
On Monday 21 July 2003 10:56 am, Tony Alfrey wrote:
I see that more and more stuff will require gcc 3.3 and I've been
running gcc 2.95.2. So can someone tell me what potential problems I
might have if I install 3.3. Specifically
a) will 3.3 prevent me from now making small changes in my
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:02 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
I see that more and more stuff will require gcc 3.3 and I've been
running gcc 2.95.2. So can someone tell me what potential problems
I might have if I install 3.3. Specifically
I just wrote a
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:07 am, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 10:56 am, Tony Alfrey wrote:
I see that more and more stuff will require gcc 3.3 and I've been
running gcc 2.95.2. So can someone tell me what potential problems
I might have if I install 3.3. Specifically
a)
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:02 am, Net Llama! wrote:
a) will 3.3 prevent me from now making small changes in my 2.4.4
kernel previously compiled with 2.95.2?
Looks like Redhat has built a 2.4.21 kernel with gcc-3.3. Now I
don't know what you
My reply is mixed within your original text...
On Monday 21 July 2003 10:56 am, Tony Alfrey wrote:
I see that more and more stuff will require gcc 3.3 and I've been
running gcc 2.95.2. So can someone tell me what potential problems I
might have if I install 3.3. Specifically
a) will 3.3
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:33 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:02 am, Net Llama! wrote:
snip
I've not run into any gcc specific problems since upgrading. Now
going to glibc-2.3.x is another story altogether (mucho
headaches).
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
I think someone suggested buying a distro with glibc-2.3.x already
built-in rather than trying to install it.
yea, but i'm a glutton for punishment.
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman
On Monday 21 July 2003 12:13 pm, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:32 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
My reply is mixed within your original text...
On Monday 21 July 2003 10:56 am, Tony Alfrey wrote:
I see that more and more stuff will require gcc 3.3 and I've been
running gcc
I've compiled 2.4.20 with 3.2.3 and no errors.
On Monday 21 July 2003 12:13 pm, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:32 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
My reply is mixed within your original text...
On Monday 21 July 2003 10:56 am, Tony Alfrey wrote:
I see that more and more stuff
On Monday 21 July 2003 09:20 am, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 12:13 pm, Tony Alfrey wrote:
snip
Any remarks from anyone about Bruce's comment on kernels lower than
2.4.21 not compiling with 3.3??
I'm running SuSE 8.2 which has gcc-3.3 installed. It is supplied
with a
Quoth Jerry McBride:
I tried that under gentoo and I failed. Therefore I just stuck with the gcc I
compiled. Now some of my personal observations in regards to gcc 3.3. That
version is still considered the cutting edge of development. I've had some
problems getting certain programs to
12 matches
Mail list logo
