OK, mount shows that my original disk is reiserfs. My new partition is
ext2, whichI just created with fdisk. There is no choice for reiserfs or
ext3 with fdisk. Does one simple run mkfs to get the file system of choice?
Joel
How can I get On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:59:47PM -0500, Kurt Wall
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:46:59 -0500 Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, mount shows that my original disk is reiserfs. My new partition is
ext2, whichI just created with fdisk. There is no choice for reiserfs or
ext3 with fdisk. Does one simple run mkfs to get the file system of choice?
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:35:47 -0800 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/19/03 21:07, Collins Richey wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:56:39 -0800 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Collins Richey wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:37:56 -0800 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:36:20 -0800 (PST) Keith Morse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
professed:
Because the F'ing vendors of those devices only make their
config/management tools able to run under windows and the bulk of your
staff are thoroughly perplexed as to the nature and reason for a
command line.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to the URLs that dep posted, I figured this out. I had to switch from
the correct 'radeon' driver to the 'vesa' driver in both framebuffer and X
thanks guys!
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
On Thursday 20 November 2003 08:39 am, Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:36:20 -0800 (PST) Keith Morse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
professed:
Because the F'ing vendors of those devices only make their
config/management tools able to run under windows and the bulk of your
staff are
Consuming 1.0K bytes, Joel Hammer blathered:
OK, mount shows that my original disk is reiserfs. My new partition is
ext2, whichI just created with fdisk. There is no choice for reiserfs or
ext3 with fdisk. Does one simple run mkfs to get the file system of choice?
fdisk creates a partition.
Is there a way to copy a file from on file system to another and keep the
inode number(s) the same on that particular file. I know the inode(s) will
have to be free on the receiving file system.
Thanks
Ben Duncan
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:22:24 -0600 Andrew L. Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED]
professed:
On a side note, the online documentation states that you can run kermit
over ssh using command line options. Kermit appears to be quite
extensive in abilities. Once again, I find myself with much to learn.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Ben Duncan wrote:
Is there a way to copy a file from on file system to another and keep the
inode number(s) the same on that particular file. I know the inode(s) will
have to be free on the receiving file system.
I don't know the answer, but i'm curious why you'd want to
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 06:06 pm, Alan Jackson wrote:
Ahem. Since I feel certain that many of you are Monty Python fans,
I offer the following :
http://www.style.org/unladenswallow/
Again, an example of someone with FAR too much time on their hands. ;-)
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 06:43 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
Well, I tried to print the document with windows XP pro off my laptop
while the laptop was hooked up to my home network, and it still
wouldn't print. I am using the HP driver laserjet III with ps support
to print them, both on the
FYI.
From time to time we have threads about the use of various filesystems (usually
degrades rapidly to my fs is better than your fs).
I just happened to be reviewing the current Gentoo Handbook - a work in
progress, and I noted the following recommendation for XFS (a favorite of many
on this
list
My laptop system has gone down while I was using it. When I tried to get it to
reboot, it stuck in grub. I used the gentoo live cd to boot from a cdrom and that
was successfull. when I tried to mount the /dev/hda3 to root system I got 5 lines
of errors, seek could not find etc. I
Evidently, a pre-existing project named Fedora has objected to Red
Hat's claims on the name:
http://www.fedora.info/fedora.htm
Kurt
--
Polymer physicists are into chains.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
What makes you so sure that the HD is bad? Can you put it into a
different box and mount any of the partitions?
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Rick Sivernell wrote:
list
My laptop system has gone down while I was using it. When I tried to get it to
reboot, it stuck in grub. I used the gentoo live
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
FYI.
From time to time we have threads about the use of various filesystems (usually
degrades rapidly to my fs is better than your fs).
I just happened to be reviewing the current Gentoo Handbook - a work in
progress, and I noted the following
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:02:42 -0800
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, an example of someone with FAR too much time on their hands. ;-)
Look, if you don't like scientific research don't subscribe-- No! Try again, Right!,
so you don't think -Bother, try again:
Ok, they have too
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 12:20, Kurt Wall wrote:
Evidently, a pre-existing project named Fedora has objected to Red
Hat's claims on the name:
http://www.fedora.info/fedora.htm
Interesting. I remember reading on fedora.redhat.com (right after the
name change from the Red Hat Linux Project to
Lonnie
You do have a point here, I did try a 2nd hd on the laptop, it worked as it
should, it was a small drive. The original will not boot, but fdisk can read the
partition. grub will start then hang. Can not put this drive in to older laptop
as it has a 1 g limit. I would like to test it on
On Thursday 20 November 2003 12:16 pm, Terence McCarthy wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:02:42 -0800
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, an example of someone with FAR too much time on their hands.
;-)
Look, if you don't like scientific research don't subscribe-- No! Try
again,
On Thursday 20 November 2003 04:21 pm, Rick Sivernell wrote:
Lonnie
You do have a point here, I did try a 2nd hd on the laptop, it worked as
it should, it was a small drive. The original will not boot, but fdisk can
read the partition. grub will start then hang. Can not put this drive in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:21:27 -0600
Rick Sivernell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lonnie
You do have a point here, I did try a 2nd hd on the laptop, it
worked as it
should, it was a small drive. The original will not boot, but fdisk
can read
On 11/20/03 14:21, Rick Sivernell wrote:
Lonnie
You do have a point here, I did try a 2nd hd on the laptop, it worked as it
should, it was a small drive. The original will not boot, but fdisk can read the
partition. grub will start then hang. Can not put this drive in to older laptop
as it has
Collins, I get the feeling that the Gentoo people are not very interested
in XFS and they don't want us using it - although this doc is better than
the previous one in which they discourged us from using it. I think they
should have the journaling warning on all the journalling systems or
Lonnie
I do not know if it is under warrenty. I will check that, should have already
thunk it, just getting like skippy hereg, just wish I was just as pretty. no
reply required.
David Andrew
will also check that out, I do have a couple of small older 2.5s here.
Many thanks, Doggnabbit,
Consuming 1.4K bytes, Collins Richey blathered:
FYI.
From time to time we have threads about the use of various filesystems (usually
degrades rapidly to my fs is better than your fs).
Well, my FS *is* better than your FS, but I digress. ;-)
[Gentoo description of XFS shortcomings snipped]
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:47:08 -0500 Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Collins, I get the feeling that the Gentoo people are not very interested
in XFS and they don't want us using it - although this doc is better than
the previous one in which they discourged us from using it. I
--- Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to do something that is admittedly a bit
foolish. I'm trying to
get the sendmail RPM from Redhat-7.3 working on my
ancient Caldera box.
There's really not much Caldera left in it, as I've
been upgrading it
piecemeal to assorted Redhat
Yes, Gentoo is conservative and that's good but at this point XFS has been
in the field for a long time and has worked well. I personally feel the
Gentoo people don't have a lot of experience with XFS so they just made
some comments that are not all that factual (as Kurt Wall pointed out) -
On Thursday 20 November 2003 09:22 pm, Rick Sivernell wrote:
Lonnie
I do not know if it is under warrenty. I will check that, should have
already thunk it, just getting like skippy hereg, just wish I was just as
pretty. no reply required.
David Andrew
will also check that out, I do
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1387528,00.asp
--
Powered by Gentoo Linux
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
32 matches
Mail list logo
