be playing the MS proxy role.
--
Burns MacDonald
Ottawa Canada
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
scripts. As I recall
Saint used to be a good tool and was available for Linux, but I don't
see an open-source version on their website any more - it's all
commercial licensing.
http://www.saintcorporation.com/products/saint_engine.html
--
Burns MacDonald
Ottawa Canada
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:31, Net Llama! wrote:
http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Sounds like something straight out of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy,
or should be.
--
Burns MacDonald
Ottawa Canada
___
Linux-users mailing list
Andrew spake:
For the rest of you XFS filesystem fans, Linus has merged XFS into the
kernel.
quote
Linus has just merged the XFS filesystem into his BitKeeper tree; it
will thus show up in the 2.5.36 kernel. XFS is a high-performance,
journaling filesystem from SGI; it now becomes the
Douglas spreken:
you are correct. SuSEconfig is the culprit. and with the 8.0, there is no
more
monolithic config file. 8.1 (released in upcoming Oct) will be evern less
monolithic config and damn near 100$ FHS/LSB compliant
I use Suse 8.0 Pro and have been pleasantly suprised by how far YAST
On Friday 31 May 2002 06:55, dep wrote:
first, did you know that your machine is telling the world that it is
july 26?
Ooops, brand new install of SuSE 8.0 Pro two days ago - forgot to set date.
Thanks.
second, rms has weighed in:
On Friday 31 May 2002 07:26, Harry G wrote:
Yes, we are not talking about replacing the normal distribution but
rather our business product SuSE Linux Enterprise Server. UnitedLinux,
at least in its first incarnation, will be based on the next version
of SLES which will be enhanced and
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 22:04, dep wrote:
joint announcement thursday from suse, turbo, caldera, and conectiva:
http://www.linuxandmain.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=77
*everybody* is being *really* tight-lipped. guesses?
I'm surprised at SuSE's participation. They have a huge
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 21:58, David A. Bandel wrote:
... But to compare
either of them to MySQL is blasphemy to someone who knows about SQL
servers and what they are/do. The operative word is ACID, and MySQL
isn't. MySQL is a fancy filesystem. It lacks atomicity, referential
integrity
On Thursday 30 May 2002 16:19, Net Llama! wrote:
As he put it i hope that the engineering is far better than the contents
of this paper.
Criptography... shit!
The format and layout looks suspiciously like a Caldera white papaer - Kurt,
do you agree?
Their licensing stance sounds rather
On Thursday 30 May 2002 19:15, dep wrote:
begin Tim Wunder's quote:
| no, in fact they went out of their way to say that a desktop
| distro *may not* carry the unitedlinux brand.
|
| Hmmm...OK, I obviously read it wrong. I just read it again and it
| appears that you're right.
Llama uttered:
A common misconception is that JFS is based on IBM's AIX filesystem. But
in reality, its based on OS/2's filesystem, which makes it a lot less
impressive (IMO).
FWIW, I don't find AIX as particularly impressive either.
A lot of the drivers are only half-cooked and/or flaky;
Yep, I use it.
I use David Skolls' PPOE from Roaring Penguin. It works quite well. We had a
small issue locally where we had to kick the modem everynow and then, but
that was because of the Bell Nexxia network.
The readme, etc that comes with the download is pretty concise and helpful.
You may
13 matches
Mail list logo
