Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
If I add it so that my procmail rule file is the following, all my e-mail
goes away:
:0 B:
*
^ZGUuDQ0KJAA[line too long]qxgG59sgBLerGAdL1zAEA6sYBWPXV
/dev/null
:0:
./
(I shortened the rule line in this message because of line wrap
suspicions.)
If I have
to
/dev/null and used this recipe that works great.
# swen
:0 B:
*
^ZGUuDQ0KJAB\+i6hSOurGATrqxgE66sYBQfbKATvqxgG59sgBLerGAdL1zAEA6sYBWPXV
null
Jason Joines
=
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:39, Jason Joines wrote:
Chris Kassopulo wrote:
Greetings,
For the last two days I've gotten 100's of emails containing exe files.
Bogus microsoft updates and patches. Each piece is around 150k which
makes for a long download on dialup
Shawn L Johnston wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:39, Jason Joines wrote:
Chris Kassopulo wrote:
Greetings,
For the last two days I've gotten 100's of emails containing exe files.
Bogus microsoft updates and patches. Each piece is around 150k which
makes for a long download on dialup
Tim Wunder wrote:
On 9/16/2003 12:23 PM, someone claiming to be Jason Joines wrote:
Michael Hipp wrote:
Jason Joines wrote:
When I do the same thing in a script via cron, I get the error in
the ouput even with 2/dev/null.
I generally use /dev/null to keep things quiet.
You can also put
.
Thanks,
Jason Joines
=
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
OpenExchange Server to avoid the licensing cost
of the default groupware product.
Jason Joines
Open Source = Open Mind
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0500
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he
is
about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about
50,000
Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun
Internet Mail Server on Solaris. He intends to replace these with ms
exchange on windows 2k. There is a small chance he will listen to
suggestions to consider non-exchange options.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Jason Joines
Open
David A. Bandel wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0500
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he
is
about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
big combined system for all employees and students
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
What's more, unlike SCO, SuSE has added quite a bit of Value to Linux. And
they've toned down their Yast tool to NOT kill all your manually edited config
files.
I also switched to SuSE from COL. At the time it was because I wanted
to try a 2.4 kernel based distro and
David A. Bandel wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:01:36 -0500
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
$ipchains -A input -s $anyhost -d $thishost 1024:65535 -p tcp -i eth0
! -y -j ACCEPT
The users have IE x.x on win2k. I had one of them try to retrieve a
file via the win2k command line
-ftpd 2.60.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jason Joines
===
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
Matthew Carpenter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed thusly on Monday, February
10, 2003 2:59 PM:
Unless you are printing from Konqueror or any other
application... Any other answers?
I've run into this before and it was so silly it made backward sense.
Something
I'm trying to get NFS to work through my firewall without much
luck. Portmap and NFS stay on dedicated ports but all those RPC
processes (statd, mountd, etc.) keep changing port numbers. Is there
any way to make these stick to a specific port?
Thanks,
Jason Joines
We have a user that uses Adobe PageMaker and other similar stuff and
her win machine constantly crashes. We would like to move her to Linux
but need to find a similar product for her to use first.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jason Joines
Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jason Joines wrote:
We have a user that uses Adobe PageMaker and other similar stuff and
her win machine constantly crashes. We would like to move her to Linux
but need to find a similar product for her to use first.
Any ideas?
Star Office
On a machine with two PCI NICS, how do you choose which is assigned to
eth0 and which is assigned to eth1?
Thanks,
Jason Joines
Open Source = Open Mind
===
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc
non-Exchange server and see if the MTA converts it to standards
well enough for your client to interpret it.
Jason Joines
Open Source = Open Mind
===
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http
won't have to
worry about it messing with your changes.
Jason Joines
Open Source = Open Mind
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
machines.
Jason Joines
Open Source = Open Mind
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
to have the auto type detect and mount a udf filesystem?
Thanks,
Jason Joines
Open Source = Open Mind
---
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives
On Monday 17 June 2002 19:18, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
I'll be installing RH 7.3 pro on a server and RH 7.3 on a
workstation. I'd like to use XFS for the file system - what's the
best way to do that?
Thanks
SuSE 8 also supports installing on XFS.
Jason Joines
Open Source = Open Minds
Is there anyway to change the owner of a running process? I have a
kiosk machine that only runs mozilla under the ID of browser. I would
like to change the owner of the process to root once mozilla has
started so that users would not be able to kill the browser.
Thanks,
Jason Joines
On Thursday 28 March 2002 10:37 am, Myles Green wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:18:42 -0600
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which would result in better performance?
1. Swap on partition 1 of ATA 100 drive on ATA 133 controller with
OS on partition 2 of same drive.
2
25 matches
Mail list logo