-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking:
I have all the time needed but not the expertise anymore. The only thing
that I can contribute is time and labour, there would have to be a
dedicated list for this too, easy nuff I guess.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking:
Doug, mate!
Do you not remember one angry old fart a couple of years ago that was not
going to let go of Caldera. He tried updating for a while till he became a
real nuciance on a certain list.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:35 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
dedicated lists (yes plural), CVS repository, and various other 'needs' can
be up and running in minutes. Since I'm currently unemployed, I got nothing
else taking up my time...
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:36 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking:
Doug, mate!
Do you not remember one angry old fart a couple of years ago that was not
going to let go of Caldera. He tried updating for
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 07:13:47 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:35 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
dedicated lists (yes plural), CVS repository, and various other
'needs' can be up and running in minutes. Since I'm currently
unemployed, I got nothing else
Quoth Collins Richey:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 07:13:47 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:35 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
dedicated lists (yes plural), CVS repository, and various other
'needs' can be up and running in minutes. Since I'm currently
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:01:04 -0400
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Collins Richey:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 07:13:47 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:35 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
dedicated lists (yes plural), CVS repository, and various
On 07/31/03 19:25, Collins Richey wrote:
If I had just a little more cold hard cash laid away, I would say my
gain. I enjoyed my work, but I never realized the almost invisible
stress that I was subjected to. I'm sleeping better, wide awake and
alert in the daytime. This should last until I
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:05 am, Collins Richey wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 07:13:47 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:35 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
dedicated lists (yes plural), CVS repository, and various other
'needs' can be up and running in minutes.
Keith Antoine wrote:
I was lucky and got retired before this all came in. The problem is that if
you are over 25 your ratshit these days.
The senior menu in nice at restaurants. ;-)
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:12 pm, Federico Voges wrote:
If you wan't a Caldera like distro, checkout Lycoris (formerly Redmond
Linux). It's based on Caldera's LTP (it even uses Lizard).
http://www.lycoris.com/
Bye!
Federico Voges
Socio gerente
Intrasoft Tel/Fax:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking:
Now what I want is the old Caldera back and updated, but that is a pipe
dream of course. So I have Redhat 9.0 (shrike) and also Slackware 9.0 on
why is this a pipe dream? almost the whole damn
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking:
Now what I want is the old Caldera back and updated, but that is a pipe
dream of course. So I have Redhat 9.0 (shrike) and also Slackware 9.0 on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Net Llama! shocked and awed us all by speaking:
We've gone this route before. I mentioend that there's no point in
starting such a project unless:
0) A sufficient number of people are willing to contribute
1) All of those people have the time to
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Net Llama! shocked and awed us all by speaking:
We've gone this route before. I mentioend that there's no point in
starting such a project unless:
0) A sufficient number of people are willing to contribute
1) All of those people have the time
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:06:24 +1000, Keith Antoine wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:12 pm, Federico Voges wrote:
If you wan't a Caldera like distro, checkout Lycoris (formerly Redmond
Linux). It's based on Caldera's LTP (it even uses Lizard).
http://www.lycoris.com/
Bye!
Federico Voges
Yes
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:12 am, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking:
Now what I want is the old Caldera back and updated, but that is a pipe
dream of course. So I have Redhat 9.0 (shrike) and also Slackware
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:40 am, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
true dat. just want to keep reminding people that if they are willing to
put their money where their mouth is, we can help a lot...
I have all the time needed but not the expertise anymore. The only thing that
I can contribute is time and
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:39 am, Net Llama! wrote:
We've gone this route before. I mentioend that there's no point in
starting such a project unless:
0) A sufficient number of people are willing to contribute
1) All of those people have the time to see it through to completion
I'm quite happy
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:48 am, Net Llama! wrote:
Indeed. I've got lots of ideas, but i don't have the time or skillz to do
it solo.
Ummm, just as a test case, are there people out there interested enough to
get involved, as advisors and ideas men plus wall bouncers grin.
WARNING, this could
Doug, Skippy
I am in school finally in last year, 5 classes left, I would like to join in
an adventure like this. I still like the old Calder 2.4 system some of the
3.1.1 too. I am an experinced developer, but never on a system lke this. There
are some thing I would like to see too. It will
I am after 2 years or so still dissatisfied with Mandarke/SuSe, in point of
fact I have after spending much money given Suse away and am thinkink of
doing the same with Mandrake.
Mandrake is great but for one thing, installation of rpms through urpmi and
all its inherant dependencies. If the
On 07/29/03 18:49, Keith Antoine wrote:
I am after 2 years or so still dissatisfied with Mandarke/SuSe, in point of
fact I have after spending much money given Suse away and am thinkink of
doing the same with Mandrake.
Mandrake is great but for one thing, installation of rpms through urpmi
Keith Antoine wrote:
So I have Redhat 9.0 (shrike) and also Slackware 9.0 on cd's. As I
do not wish, as I have done in the past, start a flame war: Could I ask for
some detatched and dispasionate thoughts on both of these, ease of install
also how good are they seeing 100% of hardware
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 19:49, Keith Antoine wrote:
I am after 2 years or so still dissatisfied with Mandarke/SuSe, in point of
fact I have after spending much money given Suse away and am thinkink of
doing the same with Mandrake.
Mandrake is great but for one thing, installation of rpms
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:49:27 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I am sure that you all know what I want, I have not asked for any
others as I know little re the rest. However feedback would be
appreciated, again I ask no this is a great OS' without the reasons
as to why.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:49:27 +1000, Keith Antoine wrote:
I am after 2 years or so still dissatisfied with Mandarke/SuSe, in point of
fact I have after spending much money given Suse away and am thinkink of
doing the same with Mandrake.
Mandrake is great but for one thing, installation of rpms
Myles Green wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 19:49, Keith Antoine wrote:
I am after 2 years or so still dissatisfied with Mandarke/SuSe, in point of
fact I have after spending much money given Suse away and am thinkink of
doing the same with Mandrake.
Mandrake is great but for one thing,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:56 am, Net Llama! wrote:
If you're looking for overall ease of use, with something that is somewhat
familiar then Redhat is definitely the way to go. Slackware will be
completely foreign to you, as RPMs are really not part of the picture, and
there's the entire
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:28 pm, Michael Hipp wrote:
BIG SNIP
RH does occasionally do dumb things like include a 0.9x version of
Mozilla (RH 7.3) and never update it to a production release. I wish it
had some kind of decent LAN browser (aka Network Neighborhood). And I'll
never get over the
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:28 pm, Myles Green wrote:
There, not a flame to be seen ;o)
HTH
Isn't that nice, maybe because I asked the question instead of answering ?
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric,
31 matches
Mail list logo
