More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Hipp
If you can follow this conversation, could someone tell me why the file 'wx-config' immediately becomes an orphan as soon as it is installed? What am I missing THIS time? # ls /usr/bin/wx-config /usr/bin/wx-config # rpm -e wxGTK-devel-2.4.2-1 wxGTK-2.4.2-1 # ls /usr/bin/wx-config ls:

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Andrew Mathews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Hipp wrote: | If you can follow this conversation, could someone tell me why the file | 'wx-config' immediately becomes an orphan as soon as it is installed? | What am I missing THIS time? | | # ls /usr/bin/wx-config | /usr/bin/wx-config | #

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Hipp
Andrew Mathews wrote: Sounds like your rpm isn't built for the distro you're trying to install it on, but something altogether different. Can you properly query the package with rpm -qpl packagename.rpm and list the fileset? It's the RPM that came in RH9 as far as I know. I don't recall upgrading

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Matthew Carpenter
First off, what Linux distro are you using, and secondly, do you need 2.4.2 or would 2.4.0 work? If you are running SuSE, check out: http://packman.links2linux.de/?action=312 On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:46:23 -0500 Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you can follow this conversation, could

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Andrew Mathews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Hipp wrote: | Andrew Mathews wrote: | | Sounds like your rpm isn't built for the distro you're trying to install | it on, but something altogether different. Can you properly query the | package with rpm -qpl packagename.rpm and list the

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Kurt Wall
Quoth Michael Hipp: If you can follow this conversation, could someone tell me why the file 'wx-config' immediately becomes an orphan as soon as it is installed? What am I missing THIS time? Is wx-config a symlink to another file that *is* installed by the RPM? Kurt -- It is easier to

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Kurt Wall
Quoth Michael Hipp: Andrew Mathews wrote: Sounds like your rpm isn't built for the distro you're trying to install it on, but something altogether different. Can you properly query the package with rpm -qpl packagename.rpm and list the fileset? It's the RPM that came in RH9 as far as I

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Hipp
Kurt Wall wrote: I'm betting that a %post-install script creates a symlink. Perhaps a command like rpm -q --scripts pkg.name.rpm (if memory serves) will tell you what you want to know? You're looking for a command that creates a symlink. It's been awhile since I was intimate with RPM, but symlinks

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Hipp
Andrew Mathews wrote: Sorry, I wasn't clear, I meant the package you're trying to install, not rpm itself. It's not Red Hat specific in any way, but I've been using the slightly earlier version with no problems. And, in fact, this one is working fine now. Whereas yesterday bash kept telling me

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Hipp
Matthew Carpenter wrote: First off, what Linux distro are you using, and secondly, do you need 2.4.2 or would 2.4.0 work? If you are running SuSE, check out: http://packman.links2linux.de/?action=312 It's Red Hat 9. I've been running 2.4.1 with no problems but thought to upgrade to 2.4.2 as it

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Kurt Wall
Quoth Michael Hipp: Kurt Wall wrote: I'm betting that a %post-install script creates a symlink. Perhaps a command like rpm -q --scripts pkg.name.rpm (if memory serves) will tell you what you want to know? You're looking for a command that creates a symlink. It's been awhile since I was

Re: More RPM madness - I'm sure it's just me ...

2003-10-08 Thread Matthew Carpenter
No, it's most likely because the link is created during a post-install script, not listed in the official file list which RPM uses to populate its database. On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:02:52 -0400 Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoth Michael Hipp: Kurt Wall wrote: I'm betting that a