On Tuesday 24 July 2001 12:29, Kurt Wall wrote:
Of course, Mike The MBR King beat me to it...
not only is it nice to be percieved as good at or for something but to be
anointed by Kurtwerks is an added bonus.
--
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 16:56, dep wrote:
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 12:30 am, burns wrote:
| I received the following gem in my mailbox. If anyone wants to see
ditto here.
fortunately? I was monitoring what dep said some days back, was it dep? who
mentioned mail asking for your help and
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 13:42, Douglas J. Hunley wrote:
fyi..
[snip]
also.
AMaViS 0.2.0-pre6 (http://aachalon.de/AMaViS/)
--
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at
Got two of those here myself, addressed to my sourceforge account.
Luckily perhaps, pine doesn't even want to extract the attachment to save
it ;^) The return address was the same each time, but the attachment
differed:
2000-04.doc.com
2000-04.doc.lnk
Received: from mail.fm99.lt
Each time I dial up to the isp the /sbin/route takes a horrible long time to
display anything, order of 20 seconds or so.
this is the result
-
192.168.1.20* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
Try route -n
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
-http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 21:58, Joel Hammer wrote:
Try route -n
instant fix, thank you.
man route then revealed for me the usefulness of -n !!
but being a cantankerous bugger i subsequently placed a dummy resolv in
/etc/hosts, typed /sbin/route no options, and voila, fixed. Permanently.
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:24:40 -0600
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:45:01AM -0700, Kenneth G. Moffat wrote:
This sounds dangerously close to an endorsement
Of?
K
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Wall wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 07:35:27PM -0400, Randy Donohoe wrote:
Thanks for the exposure, that'll help a lot. Two-second pings aren't
bad, over here in the hills of eastern Kentucky our signals come in on
surplus DC mine cable.
We use carrier pigeons to transmit our
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 06:12:54 -0700 (PST), Shawn Tayler wrote:
The subject line and attachment names are randomized, some what, by the
bug, before sending. Also the pley to address is probably not any
good, one or more characters are usually altered so the victim doesn't
Sorry guys. The Typos
Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 06:00:32 -0400 (EDT), Stew Benedict wrote:
Luckily perhaps, pine doesn't even want to extract the attachment to save
it ;^) The return address was the same each time, but the attachment
differed:
2000-04.doc.com
2000-04.doc.lnk
The subject
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 07:35:27PM -0400, Randy Donohoe wrote:
Thanks for the exposure, that'll help a lot. Two-second
pings aren't
bad, over here in the hills of eastern Kentucky our signals
come in on
surplus DC mine cable.
We use carrier pigeons to transmit our packets in
I'mleaving on that one, it's getting deeper than the mud up Muddygut
holler.
Randy Donohoe
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 11:15, you wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 07:35:27PM -0400, Randy Donohoe wrote:
Thanks for the exposure, that'll help a lot. Two-second
pings aren't
bad, over here in
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 09:12 am, Shawn Tayler wrote:
| The subject line and attachment names are randomized, some what, by
| the bug, before sending. Also the pley to address is probably not
| any good, one or more characters are usually altered so the victim
| doesn't find out about the
I got the same mail.
The .pif file extension indicates that it is an executable file for the
windows system. Most of the currently spreading viruses belong to this
category. -- I believe that it is some kind of trojen.
:-)
Auyeung
- Original Message -
From: burns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
PcCillin filtered it out right away.
Auyeung
- Original Message - Seems McAfees AV software isn't real good
at catching the damned things while downloading. It only caught it
after the requisite 20 files, 21 with the original file, was attempted
to be accessed on the reboot, sets
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:38:44PM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote:
Kurt Wall wrote:
We use carrier pigeons to transmit our packets in Holladay, UT.
Then I assume you are in full compliance with the new RFC2549, IP over
Avian Carriers with Quality of Service, which updated RFC1149,
I'm sorry as this probably won't answer your question, but won't the
reverse lookup have resolve to a mx record. At the very least you might
want to pose this question to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] user's
list. Chuck Mead is the maintainer and seriously knowledgeable about all
things
David,
Here in the pacific northwest we transmit them via tree sap
-- we aren't
allowed to use owls or other birds.
Is there an RFC that covers this? Avian carriers do have an
RFC (see my
previous post). If you method is legitimate, then it either has or
needs an EXPERIMENTAL
You can't be that close to Redmond, you've got a 360 area
code! :-) Of
course,
I suppose that's relative given the list membership.
I *work* in the 360 area code (most of western Washington). I live in 206
(Seattle area). Redmond is in 425 (King County *except* Seattle). Without
the
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 03:37 pm, you wrote:
You can't be that close to Redmond, you've got a 360 area
code! :-) Of
course,
I suppose that's relative given the list membership.
I *work* in the 360 area code (most of western Washington). I live in 206
(Seattle area). Redmond is in
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 20:37, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
Or,
my preference, I could hit it with a short range tactical nuke from here.
d In A Chord,
5 or 10kt?
Just curious.
Terence
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe,
Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
You can't be that close to Redmond, you've got a 360 area
code! :-) Of
course,
I suppose that's relative given the list membership.
I *work* in the 360 area code (most of western Washington). I live in 206
(Seattle area). Redmond is in 425 (King County
Guys,
I am tasting one of the best Ales I have ever had. The name is great
too. Its called, Arrogant Bastard Ale, subtext, You are not
worthy, Even the bottle is a great laugh! But, good
Just had to share.We now return you to your regularly scheduled
program...
stayler
The default install of OE has the preview function turned on. Attachments
with scripts extension ( visual basic, java, etc ) would be executed right
away if the message is displayed in the preview pane. That's why there are
so many victims.
- Original Message -
From: Stuart
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 20:24, Shawn Tayler wrote:
Guys,
I am tasting one of the best Ales I have ever had. The name is great
too. Its called, Arrogant Bastard Ale, subtext, You are not
worthy, Even the bottle is a great laugh! But, good
Just had to share.We now return you to
And I'm still looking. We have about 6K invested in our current windows
software setup and it basically sucks. Oh well, such is Billys world.
Ronnie
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 03:14, you wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 01:29:06 +
ronnie gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I saw PMS, I
For those who use OE. Go to IE andToolsInternet OptionsSecurityCustom
Level. Disable all scripting and you will be safe from BBV(billy based viri).
Oh yea, DONT open attachments.
Ronnie
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 21:09, you wrote:
The default install of OE has the preview function turned
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:18:50 -0400, Bruce Marshall wrote:
This is so wy off topic, I have to ask:how many of these hillarious
things have you had?
:o)
One is enough!
stayler
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:54:15 -0400, dep wrote:
and while we're at it, *telling* about beer is *not* sharing.g
--
dep
Well stop by and I will... I've got 2 cases.
stayler
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe,
30 matches
Mail list logo
