What in hell is this s**t?
Net Llama wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pong--- dilyard root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ping___Linux-users mailing list -http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
Bill Day wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
Ping Two
dilyard root wrote:
ping
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
___
Linux-users
Bill Day wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
Bill Day wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
Bill Day wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
Bill Day wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
Bill Day wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
Bill Day wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
Bill Day wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typing furiously on February 12, Cyberclops managed to emit:
What in hell is this s**t?
A stock, witty reply to ping. As in ping pong.
A slightly less hostile question would have sufficed.
As would not spamming the list with the same thing 10 times in
ping
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
pong
--- dilyard root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ping
___
Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
above URL.
pong
On Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out:
ping
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above
URL.
--
Bill Day
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:18,Kurt Wall scribed:
Scribbling feverishly on January 21, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit:
dilyard root babbled on about:
pong
ignore him. he's a smart@$$
There are several such on this list. I, of course, am not one of
them. ;-)
Kurt
Anyone seen a spare
pong
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Scribbling feverishly on January 21, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit:
dilyard root babbled on about:
pong
ignore him. he's a smart@$$
There are several such on this list. I, of course, am not one of
them. ;-)
Kurt
--
You now have Asian Flu.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:18:09 -0500
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scribbling feverishly on January 21, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit:
dilyard root babbled on about:
pong
ignore him. he's a smart@$$
There are several such on this list. I, of course, am not one of
them. ;-)
Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Bruce Marshall managed to emit:
On Friday 18 January 2002 22:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit:
tsting
wrkng
K
Say wht?
Doug and I are having breakfast at a Waffle House in Columbus, OH
Scribbling feverishly on January 19, David Aikema managed to emit:
On January 18, 2002 07:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit:
tsting
wrkng
I think you misspelled that. It should be wrking. You've gotta stay true
to form after
tsting
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Sys Admin wrote:
tsting
It's not working... Some vowels are being dropped :-(
Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Ben Franklin (1759)
Jay Nugent babbled on about:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Sys Admin wrote:
tsting
It's not working... Some vowels are being dropped :-(
good one ;)
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://linux.nf
If NT is your answer, you don't
Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit:
tsting
wrkng
K
--
You will engage in a profitable business activity.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Kurt Wall babbled on about:
Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit:
tsting
wrkng
thanks! see you in the morn
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://linux.nf
printk(HPFS: G... Kernel memory corrupted
On Friday 18 January 2002 22:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit:
tsting
wrkng
K
Say wht?
--
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI
Collins Richey wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:36:32 -0500 David A. Bandel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Collins Richey wrote:
[snip]
Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2
patches. pre2 went on with no complaints.
Let me try one more time:
normal patches from one
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:49:19 -0500 David A. Bandel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Collins Richey wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:36:32 -0500 David A. Bandel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Collins Richey wrote:
[snip]
Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc was
posted
for public consumption...
Anyone else notice or working with it???
I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 David A. Bandel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc
was
posted
for public consumption...
Anyone else notice or
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---snip---
You sure are slow.
True enough... but very pleasurable I assure you. :')
Aside from that... I didn't notice any traffic that mentioned either 2.5.0 or
2.4.16...
I was just being curious.
--
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:09:26 -0700 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 David A. Bandel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 23:52 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much fun in
my OS/2 days!
Gess it doesn't take much to get you going :o)
(an old OS/2 camper)
--
Collins Richey wrote:
[snip]
Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2
patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. For pre2 I got several
files with Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume
-R?. I hit eneter, then Apply anyway reply n. Is this usual
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:36:32 -0500 David A. Bandel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Collins Richey wrote:
[snip]
Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2
patches. pre2 went on with no complaints.
Let me try one more time:
normal patches from one revision
Collins Richey wrote:
%
% Thanks, David
%
% That is now very clear; will remember forever. I presume this means,
% if you have the pristine base source, you only need the very latest
% -pren or -acn patch?
%
% One more question. When I apply (using one of several methods,
% depending on
I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc was posted
for public consumption...
Anyone else notice or working with it???
I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much fun in my
OS/2 days!
--
On Thursday 29 November 2001 14:52, Jerry McBride enunciated:
I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc was
posted for public consumption...
Anyone else notice or working with it???
I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much fun in
my OS/2
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Barbie.com and KDE 2.1.2
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 18:58:21 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I checked in on it, looks like it loads up
I would say... Is there any way around your requirements?
HP (and Microtek) make pretty decent stuff, but mainly for low-end graphic
arts work: not high-speed or larger format. Then there's always Fujitsu,
and they seem affordable for production scanners, but theirs leave you with
a choice
Quoting Stuart Biggerstaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would say... Is there any way around your requirements?
HP (and Microtek) make pretty decent stuff, but mainly for low-end
graphic
arts work: not high-speed or larger format. Then there's always
Fujitsu,
and they seem affordable for
take a look at http://linux.nf first.
HP is the usual choice.
Ian Marchak wrote:
Anyone have any experiences, good or bad, with scanners that are intended for
office use. Namely, I am trying to track down reviews and details on scanners
that include:
- D-Size / 11x17 / A3 format
- Colour
-
Chang wrote:
take a look at http://linux.nf first.
HP is the usual choice.
Ian Marchak wrote:
Anyone have any experiences, good or bad, with scanners that are intended for
office use. Namely, I am trying to track down reviews and details on scanners
that include:
- D-Size / 11x17
Hi Guys
I am having a strange problem with COL3.1, KDE 2.1.1 ,m and CUPSD. I
have 256M of RAM on this system and it is
swapping to beat the band. It even hangs when xcdroast (It pre5 and
I've not updated it yet) is run. Vmsize in
KDEguard shows CUPSD with 545653 and rising, went from 300K
It worked. Interesting, I've only had sporadic trouble with @Home and Yahoo
on this list.
Jim
On Sunday July 29, 2001 4:34 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
test
--
9:42pm up 5 days, 22:16, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Very good question. Do you have a setup to try it? I don't see why,
if you've been able to log in using a secure shell, why this wouldn't
work. The name/ip that you use to log in would be the one used to set
the DISPLAY environment variable. Incidently, you don't need the .0,
since this is
46 matches
Mail list logo
