Re: FreeBSD again ot

2002-01-15 Thread Collins Richey

On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:53:10 -0500
burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On January 13, 2002 09:55 am, Mike Andrew wrote:
 
 
  moi aussie?
 
 Yes you are.  
 Moi canuck.

moi troll, as I'm sure you all remember.
-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
WWTLRD? - FreeBSD 4.4 + xfce + sylpheed
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Microsoft Support OT

2002-01-15 Thread Kurt Wall

Scribbling feverishly on January 14, burns managed to emit:
 One of our accountants recently bought a special bundled deal from IBM.
  
 Included with the PC was a digital camera. 
 
 The PC came with XP pre-loaded. 
 
 There are no drivers available to allow the camea to work under XP.
 
 Go figgur. 
 
 PS: Is this a reflection on accountants, MS or IBM?

Yes.

K
-- 
What happened last night can happen again.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Fwd: Need help to get back on the list

2002-01-15 Thread Tim Wunder

Douglas J Hunley wrote:
 forwarded per Joel's request. He can receive mail from the list fine, but 
 whenever he tries to send to linux.nf he gets rejected with what's below. 
 anyone know how to help him?
 
 --  Forwarded Message  --
 
 Subject: Need help to get back on the list
 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:27:57 -0500
 From: Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I need help to get back on the linux step by step mailing list.
 Maybe you can relay this to the list or to the right person.  I had to
 change my ip address because of the @HOME troubles. Everything seems to
 be going well except I couldn't post to the linux list. I re-subscribed,
 but this is what I get in return mail now:
 
 451 [EMAIL PROTECTED] reply: read error from linux.nf.
 
 ... while talking to mail.panamanow.net.:
 
RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
  550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied. IP name possibly
 forged [68.33.0.214]
 
 That possibly forged ip is the one I was assigned by @HOME. If you
 could forward this to the list, maybe someone could let me know how to
 solve this.
 
 Thanks,
 Joel
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ---
 
 

Joel,
Are you using your own box as the smtp server for sending mail? I'm not 
experiencing any problems and I'm using mail.twsn1.md.home.com as my 
smtp server (while at home, anyway).
Try setting up your mailer to use the old @home mail server as your smtp 
server and see if you can post.
HTH,
Tim



___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: FreeBSD again ot

2002-01-15 Thread Mike Andrew

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:59, Kurt Wall wrote:

 I'm a Ammurrican.

Troglodyte's don't have nationalities.


-- 
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: How trashed is it?

2002-01-15 Thread Mike Andrew

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 01:03, Tim Wunder wrote:

 My installation of RedHat 7.0 requires 'su -' to get root's path.

 Every Caldera distro I've used (2.3, 2.4, 3.1) didn't require that,

It's annoying. The technical difference is that the existing environment is 
retained (not another shell) without the -. Mere Mortals under Redhat don't 
automatically have access to /sbin, it's not in the path. You can change this 
behaviour simply by editing (dot)bashrc in your $home directory and set the 
/sbin pathway. Then you get Caldera (tm) su. 

yep, it's annoying and can be changed in the (dot)basrc to reflect the /sbin 
paths. (that's the difference)

 I haven't seen where including 'root' in the su command is required,

it aint. 'root' is implied, OR, you can explicitly state it. Both mean same.

-- 
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: More Steps Jan16

2002-01-15 Thread Tim Wunder

Mike Andrew wrote:
 Bedtime - ide cd burning (revised)

Says: The above order of module loading will ensure that your zips and 
tapes will remain as ide controlled devices, if that is want you want. 
The reality is that both of these drivers are SCSI emulators and they in 
fact use truncated code from ide-scsi to achieve an identical result. 
Thus, you can cheerfully eliminate their need. ide-scsi will cover them 
with the exact same /dev/names. I have included the above modprobe list 
to orient you to what's happening, not, what you need to do.


The end result of all this is that by eliminating any reference to any 
of the ide-xxx type drivers in your /etc/modules.conf (or wherever 
device loading is instantiated /etc/rc.modules eg) and simply stating 
ide-scsi, your problems are over for modular drivers.

But, the fact remains that if I do NOT load ide-floppy first and rely on 
ide-scsi, ide-scsi does NOT cover them with *the exact same* /dev/names. 
With ide-floppy loaded first, I access my Zip drive on /dev/hdc4, 
without it, I have NO access to my Zip drive (ostensibly because I have 
NOT compiled scsi disk support into my kernel (CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD)).

At least it is that way using Caldera eW3.1 with kernel 2.4.9.

Other that that little nit, the document is very  well written and has 
helped me understand the ide-scsi process a great deal.
Thanks!

Tim

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: cdrom help

2002-01-15 Thread Jim Conner

Well, I gotta open the case and check.  It worked about 2 years ago when this 
box had Windows on it.  Yes, I've been in the box since then and might have 
bumped the wire loose or something.  As far as the settings in KMix, I have 
all the volumes maxed(I'll probably be either deafened or scared witless when 
it does finally work) and have played with about every variation of 
muting/unmuting that I can imagine.  So, I'll open the case when I get a 
chance and check it out.

Jim

On Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:10, Dave Anselmi wrote:
 Jim Conner wrote:

 [...]

  As for fixing cd audio, it's on that big to-do list that's a mile long. 
  It's not critical, I get all other sounds, but would be nice to have
  working.

 If you have sound working generally, there are only 2 things I can think of
 to add for CD audio.  First, you need a wire connecting your CD's audo port
 to your sound card.  Second, you may need to unmute or otherwise adjust the
 CD audio channel in your mixer.

 Dave


 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
 
  1:42pm  up 22:25,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.06, 0.07

Running Caldera W3.1 - Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Partitioner

2002-01-15 Thread Nate Cole

Hello All.

I got the go ahead at work to use Linux as a Workstation (yeah,
baby!).  However, I use Win2k and would need the two to
co-exist on the same machine for support reasons.

I need to get a partition out this W2k box from the remaining
free space.  Can anyone recommend a _free_ partition
resizer/creator that can handle NTFS?  I would prefer not to
buy PartitionMagic, as it is really a one-time use kind of
thing.

Thanks,

Nate

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Partitioner

2002-01-15 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 16:11 pm, Nate Cole wrote:
 I need to get a partition out this W2k box from the remaining
 free space.  Can anyone recommend a _free_ partition
 resizer/creator that can handle NTFS?  I would prefer not to
 buy PartitionMagic, as it is really a one-time use kind of
 thing.

Partition Magic was going to be my recommendation, particularly since you 
have Windows on the box.  Some *nix partitioners do weird things to the 
partition table.

(and I doubt if it would be a one-time use.   :o)


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 01/15/02 17:15  +
++
The average woman would rather have beauty than brains, because the
average man can see better than he can think.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Veering OTKylix Licensing

2002-01-15 Thread Ken Moffat

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:40:53 +1130
Mike Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 02:06, Kurt Wall wrote:
  Yow! Guess I won't be using Kylix:
 
 I was dissapointed with it for different reasons grin. It uses a 
 (hidden)version of wine, and I just don't like that emulator and a 48
meg  trial download is huge, in my book.

They will be changing the license terms. I'm sure it's under review, since
the borland forums are up in arms. As for wine, it's only the ide that
uses it, not the finished apps. The problem I have with kylix is
distributing apps, since you need about 8 megs of libraries. I've heard it
requires the particular version of qt that ships with kylix, so you end up
with a .tar.gz of 3+ megs that blows up to 8+ on install.

For those who are using kylix, try InstallMade, which makes a .tar.gz of
the finished project including autodetecting and packaging the required
libraries and links, etc.

-- 
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Veering OTKylix Licensing

2002-01-15 Thread Jerry McBride

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:36:14 -0500 Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yow! Guess I won't be using Kylix:
 
 12.  AUDIT.  During the term of this License and for one
  (1) year thereafter, upon reasonable notice and during
  normal business hours, Borland or its outside auditors will
  have the right to enter your premises and access your
  records and computer systems to verify that you have paid
  to Borland the correct amounts owed under this License
  and determine whether the Products are being used in
  accordance with the terms of this License.  You will
  provide reasonable assistance to Borland in connection
  with this provision.  You agree to pay the cost of the audit
  if any underpayments during the period covered by the
  audit amount to more than five percent (5%) of the fees
  actually owed for that period.
 


Damn! I wonder it they'll be waring long,black hooded robs and dragging a torture 
device behind them?

-- 

**
 Registered Linux User Number 185956
  http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=ensafe=offgroup=linux
 6:01pm  up 23:11,  5 users,  load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: How trashed is it?

2002-01-15 Thread Jerry McBride

On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:18:40 -0800 (PST) Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think a bit more investigation is needed before you can assume that
 this a system wide problem.  How many binaries are exhibiting this
 problem?  

Three... All have to do with accessing files belonging to root. I get this error 
message: ERROR: tpsetup must be run in root mode

This is after relogging into the box as root user, not via su. Also, said files have 
644 and root.root.

Two of the apps have to do with setting up printer daemons. One for LPRng via checkpc 
and the other is tpsetup or xtpsetup for TurboPrint. 

Checkpc dies because it can't access /etc/printcap... gotta' be root and the 
turboprint executable claims the same

However, I am root.

Go figure. I'll be taking this box home for dissection this weekend.

Cheers, all.





-- 

**
 Registered Linux User Number 185956
  http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=ensafe=offgroup=linux
 6:01pm  up 23:11,  5 users,  load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: kde fails to shutdown/restart

2002-01-15 Thread Peter Ruskin

On Tuesday 15 Jan 2002 11:55, Collins Richey wrote:
 I'm reporting this here as well as for freebsd-questions, because it is
 probably kde related and not necessarily FreeBSD related.

 kde does not usually shutdown completely and, as a result, frequently
 fails to start (dcop server unable to establish communications).  I
 start kde from my normal user with 'startx'.  Most of the time I do not
 get a command prompt back after kde termination and have to 'ctrl-c'.

 When the 'startx' fails, I have to su -, cd to /tmp and delete
 everything kde related that I can find.  The really critical piece
 seems to be 'rm -r .ICE-unix'.

 I'm using the version of kde installed fro the 4.4 install CD.  I
 believe this kded 2.2.2, but there is no about box that I can find to
 verify.

 Any ideas?

I have added this to the beginning of startkde...

# Clean up behind any prior session ( advised by Andreas Pour )
MYNAME=`id -un`
MYDISPLAY=`echo $DISPLAY | sed -e 's@:@@;s@\..*@@'`
for file in /tmp/konqueror* /tmp/kfm_*_$MYDISPLAY /tmp/kio*_$MYDISPLAY \
 /tmp/klauncher* /tmp/kfm-cache-`id -u` /tmp/ksocket-$MYNAME \
 /tmp/mcop-$MYNAME /tmp/kde-$MYNAME /tmp/orbit-$MYNAME ; do
  if test -e $file -a -O $file ; then
rm -rf $file
  fi
done

-- 
Peter Ruskin, Wrexham, Wales.  AMD Athlon XP 1600+, 512MB RAM.
Registered Linux User 219434 ( see http://counter.li.org/ ).
Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) for i586
Kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk-win4lin,  XFree86 4.1.0, patch level 21mdk.
KDE: 2.2.2.  Qt: 2.3.2.  Up 1 day 3 hours 44 minutes.
---
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Partitioner

2002-01-15 Thread Peter Ruskin

On Tuesday 15 Jan 2002 22:16, Bruce Marshall wrote:
 On Tuesday 15 January 2002 16:11 pm, Nate Cole wrote:
  I need to get a partition out this W2k box from the remaining
  free space.  Can anyone recommend a _free_ partition
  resizer/creator that can handle NTFS?  I would prefer not to
  buy PartitionMagic, as it is really a one-time use kind of
  thing.

 Partition Magic was going to be my recommendation, particularly since
 you have Windows on the box.  Some *nix partitioners do weird things to
 the partition table.

 (and I doubt if it would be a one-time use.   :o)

Partition Magic _still_ does not understand ext3, reiserfs, jfs, etc.  If 
you're only interested in NTFS and ext3 ( and linux swap ) it's OK but 
far too expensive.

I'm now using Acronis OS Selector 5.0.  It only costs a few pennies and 
you can download it for free to try.
http://www.acronis.com
-- 
Peter Ruskin, Wrexham, Wales.  AMD Athlon XP 1600+, 512MB RAM.
Registered Linux User 219434 ( see http://counter.li.org/ ).
Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) for i586
Kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk-win4lin,  XFree86 4.1.0, patch level 21mdk.
KDE: 2.2.2.  Qt: 2.3.2.  Up 1 day 5 hours 27 minutes.
---
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: got back to CDRW

2002-01-15 Thread Keith Antoine

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:03,Robert Hemus scribed:
 I know Lonnie is going to be pissed at my ignorance but,

 I think I have scsi_mod, sg, SR_mod, and ide_scsi installed correctly
 'cause when I boot up they go by OK. Here is my /etc/fstab

 devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
 /proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
 #/dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660 ro,user,noauto,exec 0 0
 /dev/cdrom /mnt/sr0 iso9660 roo,user,noauto,exec 0 0
 /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto defaults,user,noauto 0 0
 /dev/hdb1 / ext2 defaults 1 1
 /dev/hdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0
 /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda1 vfat ro 0 0

 I'm confused about Change the link to point to the appropriate scsi
 cdrom device.  Did I do it right?  Not like this /dev/cdrom /mnt/sr0
 iso9660 roo,user,noauto,exec 0 0 ?  It doesn't work!
 My CDRW Automounts and mounts when I click the icon. When I try to mount
 it in a console I get
 mount: can't find /mnt/cdrom in /etc/fstab or /etc/mtab
 Or
 mount: block device /dev/cdrom is write-protected, mounting read-only
 mount: mount point /mnt/sr0 does not exist

I a possibly late with this but your /etc/fstab is wrong:
#1 /dev/cdrom /mnt/sr0 iso9660 roo,user,noauto,exec 0 0 (this line is wrong 
and should read) /dev/sr0 /mnt/x where  is the mountpoint such as 
'cdrw' or 'cdrecorder' etc. Also its ro, not roo,
#2 /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda1 vfat ro 0 0 (would like to see ro,noauto,user 0 0 in 
here)

Thius might help if not too late
-- 
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Partitioner

2002-01-15 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 18:26 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
 Partition Magic _still_ does not understand ext3, reiserfs, jfs, etc.  If
 you're only interested in NTFS and ext3 ( and linux swap ) it's OK but
 far too expensive.

It doesn't have to.  There are other ways to format once a partition is made.

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 01/15/02 18:33  +
++
A day without sunshine is like, night.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: FreeBSD - Part II

2002-01-15 Thread Philip J. Koenig

On 15 Jan 2002, at 8:23, BOF boldly uttered: 

 The biggest problem I have had with installs is with network cards. 
 While FreeBSD supports many, many brands, most of them are not available 
 during installation, including Tulip-chipped ones (I use Netgear 310's 
 almost exclusively). This is easily corrected with a kernel recompile, 
 which I think is even simpler than with Linux, but a nuisance to have to 
 do right off the bat! (There may be a way around this using modules, but 
 I just do the kernel recompile since I end up doing one eventually anyway).


I do not recall ever having to do this with FreeBSD.  I have a 
FreeBSD box here that was installed with v4.2 and updated via sources 
to 4.3-Stable and the Netgear NIC was recognized off the bat using 
the dc driver.  The line device  dc appears in the GENERIC kernel 
configuration file. (/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC) 

One thing that you may have to do when installing is disable a bunch 
of the other drivers (ie for NICS) that are part of the GENERIC 
kernel, some of which may conflict resource-wise with your installed 
card.  This is done via a graphical utility (ie curses-based) 
during the install process.  No re-compiling is necessary.  It just 
disables these devices at boot time using the kernel configuration 
file /boot/kernel.conf.


 The most difficult thing with installation is the disk partitioning. 
 Luckily, FreeBSD will do a good job by default, and I suggest this for a 
 newbie, as long as there is not going to be a lot of customization to 
 the system.


Actually these days I think sysinstall makes partitioning the disk 
quite easy, assuming you know how much space you want to allocate to 
things, where you want the mount points to be, and assuming you 
understand the differences between FreeBSD disk nomenclature and ie 
Linux. (FreeBSD calls what some of us think of a partition a slice, 
and then the filesystems are assigned within that slice by something 
called the label editor.  This is run for you by the install 
process.)


 In fact, if one gets brave enough, the entire system can be 
 uprgarding from version to version by using the porting concept. (I 
 tried it once: it took about six hours, four of which was recompile time).


It's not the porting concept, the FreeBSD base system is based on a 
collection of source code maintained via CVS mirrors around the 
world.  Source code for the release comes on the install CD, if you 
want to stay current, you install the cvsup utility, decide on a 
version to track (bleeding-edge, stable, or just security fixes), use 
cvsup to update all your sources, and do the following:

(as user)

cd /usr/src
make buildworld
make buildkernel

(as root after rebooting single-user mode)

make installworld
make installkernel
mergemaster


Mergemaster is a cool script that checks cvs versions of all the 
configuration files (most located in /etc) and allows you to either 
allow the newest default conf file to overwrite your current one (say 
for things like hardware drivers), merge your existing conf file with 
the new one, or keep your existing conf file.  It goes through all 
the standard system configuration files this way, and at the end 
prompts to do other necessary tasks like rebuilding the email aliases 
and device files.

THE biggest feature IMHO that FreeBSD has over typical Linux distros 
is that there is a single, unified FreeBSD.  You don't have to 
spend your life trying to keep up with all the minutiae and 
idiosyncracies of every distro and which kernel variation it has, 
what utilities are present, what security patches are installed, bla 
bla bla.  You simply update your sources, make world, and you're up 
to date.  Everything in /bin, /usr/bin, /sbin, /usr/sbin are updated 
to current.  Sendmail is updated, BIND is updated, NTP is updated, 
etc. (I have found that oftentimes updating Linux distros to a newer 
version ends up being futile, most people just tell you to re-install 
the whole stupid thing.  I do NOT consider this a reasonable option, 
considering all the work that goes into getting a machine customized 
the way you like it.)

If you want something not included in the base system, there are 
thousands of ports that automatically install simply by changing to 
their directory and typing make make install.  All dependencies 
are retrieved and installed in the process, and the port is added to 
the package database. (in order to keep track of what is installed 
and to cleanly uninstall)

BTW, the reason BASH does not come with the default system is that it 
is GPL.  FreeBSD uses the BSD license, which is less restrictive than 
the GPL about returning modified work back to the public.  Therefore 
BASH can never actually be included with the base system because 
AFAIK its license conflicts with the BSD license.


Phil



--
Philip J. Koenig   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electric Kahuna Systems -- Computers  Communications for the New 

Re: Microsoft Support OT

2002-01-15 Thread Ted Ozolins

On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:12:56 -0500
Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 So, even if MS makes a decent OS, the MS support people, trained
 in nothing in particular, are so useless that simple problems
 can't get fixed without reinstalling.
 Of course, nothing in this post detracts from the fact that MS
 will take over the world, sooner or later, because idiots
 outnumber intelligent people at least 10:1. Guess which market MS
 aims at?
 (Of course, this assumes that XP pro CAN be configured to talk to
 his school network. It worked fine on my home network.)
 Joel

Why am I not surprised. M$ can't even keep their security update server for XP up and 
running. 

-- 
Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO)
Westbank, B.C.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Microsoft Support OT

2002-01-15 Thread Ted Ozolins

On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:40:37 -0500
burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On January 14, 2002 11:12 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
  Just a tibit to give us all a laugh while MS takes over the
  computer world.
 snip
 
 One of our accountants recently bought a special bundled deal from IBM.
  
 Included with the PC was a digital camera. 
 
 The PC came with XP pre-loaded. 
 
 There are no drivers available to allow the camea to work under XP.
 
 Go figgur. 
 
 PS: Is this a reflection on accountants, MS or IBM?
 
 -- 
 burns

The worst part of it is that if the manufacturer of that cam were to offer a driver 
for it on their web site and didn't get M$'s blessing for it, XP will complain big 
time. It will warn you that the driver has not been certified by M$ and if you 
continue to install it some if not all programs  will cease to function properly 
wow, what a great operating system.

-- 
Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO)
Westbank, B.C.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



configuring ISDN terminal adaptor

2002-01-15 Thread lesley
I am trying to get my ISDN terminal adaptor to connect to the internet.  I'm
running red Hat 7.2.  The connection process intitially begins ok but stops
with the message "setting modem volume" showing in the dialog box. It looks
like a configuration problem.

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Partitioner

2002-01-15 Thread Keith Antoine

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:33,Bruce Marshall scribed:
 On Tuesday 15 January 2002 18:26 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
  Partition Magic _still_ does not understand ext3, reiserfs, jfs, etc.  If
  you're only interested in NTFS and ext3 ( and linux swap ) it's OK but
  far too expensive.

 It doesn't have to.  There are other ways to format once a partition is
 made.

However what happens when you wish to resize a partition/partitions that are 
ext3; it cannot do that, just found out this week. Cannot work with ext3 
partitions.

-- 
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: FreeBSD - Part II

2002-01-15 Thread Collins Richey

[ snips ]

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:23:35 -0700
BOF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dave Anselmi wrote:
 
 Thanks for the post, I'm much more likely to try *BSD now.  Perhaps either Open of 
Free the next server I need.  Since there is less hardware support (video, audio) and 
the main desktop/window managers seem to be developed for Linux I think I'd stay away 
from a desktop machine (just me, my brother-in-law uses FreeBSD on a laptop).  
 
 I use FreeBSD on a desktop system as well as a laptop. While the 
 hardware support is getting better, it is, IMnosoHO, about where Linux 
 was 2 -3 years ago. Since most of my computers are 2 - 3 years old, this 
 is no problem g.

I value it as a desktop system, but thus far I haven't figured any way to get 
OpenOffice on FreeBSD.

 
 The biggest problem I have had with installs is with network cards. 
 While FreeBSD supports many, many brands, most of them are not
 available during installation, including Tulip-chipped ones (I use
 Netgear 310's  almost exclusively). 

I beg to differ on the Netgear 310's topic.  I'm using an FA310TX which talks tulip on 
linux, but I chose the most likely looking choice (I can't remember the 3 or 4 numbers 
on the choice line, but tulip wasn't listed.  I believe it was the very first choice 
listed by the installer.), disabled the other conflicting choices), and my networking 
is working fine with the GENERIC kernel.

 The most difficult thing with installation is the disk partitioning. 
 Luckily, FreeBSD will do a good job by default, and I suggest this for a 
 newbie, as long as there is not going to be a lot of customization to 
 the system. 

Agreed, it's strange to linux eyes.  The drawback to the auto (default) choice is that 
a very small / slice is created which will limit your /home directory.  I'll probably 
windup redoing my install once I figure it all out.  Right now I have a downloads in 
the /usr slice where most of the space is available.


-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
WWTLRD? - FreeBSD 4.4 + xfce + sylpheed
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Partitioner

2002-01-15 Thread Tim Wunder

Previously, Keith Antoine chose to write:
 On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:33,Bruce Marshall scribed:
  On Tuesday 15 January 2002 18:26 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
   Partition Magic _still_ does not understand ext3, reiserfs, jfs, etc.
    If you're only interested in NTFS and ext3 ( and linux swap ) it's OK
   but far too expensive.
 
  It doesn't have to.  There are other ways to format once a partition is
  made.

 However what happens when you wish to resize a partition/partitions that
 are ext3; it cannot do that, just found out this week. Cannot work with
 ext3 partitions.

But isn't ext3 just ext2 with journaling? Can't you make the partition ext2 
without destroying the data? Then, resize the partition as ext2 and the 
rebuild the journal and make it an ext3 partition?

Just asking...

Tim

-- 
Caldera eWorkstation 3.1, kernel 2.4.9, KDE 2.2.1, Xfree86 4.1.0
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Microsoft Support OT

2002-01-15 Thread Kurt Wall

Scribbling feverishly on January 15, burns managed to emit:
 On January 15, 2002 08:54 am, Kurt Wall wrote:
 
 
   I have told them that MCSE stands for Must Consult with Someone Else,
 
 Mouse Certified System Engineer

Must Confer with Someone Experienced

Kurt
-- 
You will be married within a year.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: anyone know of

2002-01-15 Thread Ronnie Gauthier

Discus
I got it at 
http://www.discusware.com/discus/

Ronnie

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:48, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
 a decent forum system that allows people to subscribe to it in such a way
 that all posts to a particular forum are emailed to them. and when they
 reply to the email, they reply shows up on the forum?
 anyone?

-- 
Ronnie
==
Each days terror almost a form of boredom
madmen at the wheel and stepping on the gas and the brakes no good
and each day one, sometimes two, morning glories
faultless, blue, blue sometimes flecked with magenta
each lit from within with the first sunlight
   -- Denise Levertov --
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users