Re: Re: replacing win98

2001-11-19 Thread Susan Macchia

I would go with the express and it's based on 2.0; so I was wondering what was
needed and how to apply it.  TIA

Bruce Marshall wrote:

On Sunday 18 November 2001 22:22 pm, Susan Macchia wrote:
  I am still evaluating VMware 3.0, but want to probably go with express.
  Since I am running 2.4.10 kernel (SuSE 7.3), what kind of work around
  might I have to do?  I'd like to know before I fork up the dough.

 No workaround should be needed for any version of VMWare at the 3.x level.

 The work around mentioned was for people running 2.0.x versions of VMware
 when they wanted to run  2.4.7 or greater kernels.  A small piece of new
 source was needed and it was readily available.  I still have it but you
 shouldn't need it.   I'm running vanilla  2.4.14  with 3.0 workstation and it
 installs just fine.



=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-19 Thread Collins Richey



[ snips ]On Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:13:07 -0800 (PST) Susan Macchia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Keith Antione wrote:
  On Monday 19 November 2001 02:54, Susan Macchia enunciated:
   I was running the full version (evaulation copy) and used the
 wizard to
   create the vm. 

   I still haven't decided whether to fork up the $ for the full
 version or to
   go with the express, since I may not need win2k.  But I do think
 that I am
   going to give up on Win4Lin...

 I'd really like to keep win2k because I need to use
 Word for the
 occasions when my boss ships me an Office2k .doc file that I need to
 read or
 update (like our software project plan).  

Just my $.02.  YMMV.  If all you need Windoze for is the occasional
document or unsupported feature, just keep a dual boot environment (as
I do) and also get up to speed with OpenOffice 638C (as I do)  (or the
equivalent Beta StarOffice release).  Many Office documents can be
read and exported by OO now, although there's not always an exact
equivalence for fonts.  OO/Star is  bit slow to startup, but it's
getting much better with each release.

It's a lot simpler than monkying around with Windows emulators.


-- 
Collins Richey
Denver Area
gentoo_rc6 xfce+sylpheed
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Re: replacing win98

2001-11-19 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Monday 19 November 2001 7:10 am, Susan Macchia wrote:
 I would go with the express and it's based on 2.0; so I was wondering what
 was needed and how to apply it.  TIA

All you have to do is replace a file with a  newer one.   After that, the  
vmware-config.pl operates just the same.


If you need the file, let me know.


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 11/19/01 09:00  +
++
Ninety-eight percent of the adults in this country are decent,
hard-working, honest Americans.  It's the other lousy two percent that
get all the publicity.  But then, we elected them.  --Lily Tomlin
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-19 Thread Susan Macchia


I had a dual boot when I first started using Linux (COL2.4) way back.  *HATED*
having to reboot.  To me, one of the most important features is a stable OS
that doesn't have to be rebooted several times a day.  And as a unix developer
from way back, I truly dislike windows and LOVE having the familiar OS and
tools at my fingertips; I can transfer knowledge from 15+ years easily.  I can
always figure out what is going on and can build any kind of product I want. 
Plus the loads of open source goodies out there... well preaching to the quire
:-)

As far as word processing/office stuff is concerned, Star/Open Office is
completely adequate for 99% of my needs.  I only use windows for Quicken,
Daytimer Addressbook, and occasional printing of photos (the tool is nice - can
place photo wherever I want on page *easily*).

So - since I use linux for everything else, I DO NOT want to reboot and have
been using Win4Lin until my switch to SuSE (netraverse doesn't have a 7.3
enabled kernel).  This prompted me to try VMware - hence this discussion.  At
some point over the next year or so, I want to be completely windoze free... 

OT
Just tried the latest Quicken 2002 and dislike it - so I may shift everything
to either GNUcash or Moneydance (+ spreadsheet for budget) since I only do home
finances w/ it.  My only issue is finding the time to make the shift.
/OT

[snip]
  I'd really like to keep win2k because I need to use
  Word for the
  occasions when my boss ships me an Office2k .doc file that I need to
  read or
  update (like our software project plan).

 Just my $.02.  YMMV.  If all you need Windoze for is the occasional
 document or unsupported feature, just keep a dual boot environment
 (as I do) and also get up to speed with OpenOffice 638C (as I do)
 (or the equivalent Beta StarOffice release).  Many Office documents
 can be read and exported by OO now, although there's not always an
 exact equivalence for fonts.  OO/Star is  bit slow to startup, but
 it's getting much better with each release. It's a lot simpler than
 monkying around with Windows emulators.


=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-19 Thread Jim Conner

Take a look at Kapital by theKompany.  There should be a demo rpm on their 
ftp site to look at.  It's very similar to Quicken.  I currently use 
Moneydance, but will probably be transfering to Kapital soon.  It's cheaper 
than Moneydance, and looks nicer.

Jim

On Monday, November 19, 2001 9:33, Susan Macchia wrote:
snip
 OT
 Just tried the latest Quicken 2002 and dislike it - so I may shift
 everything to either GNUcash or Moneydance (+ spreadsheet for budget) since
 I only do home finances w/ it.  My only issue is finding the time to make
 the shift. /OT

 [snip]
 _
 Susan Macchia
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
 
 11:42am  up 20:46,  2 users,  load average: 0.26, 0.14, 0.06

Running Caldera W3.1 - Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-19 Thread Susan Macchia

Thanks - I'll check it out.

 Take a look at Kapital by theKompany.  There should be a demo rpm on their
 ftp site to look at.  It's very similar to Quicken.  I currently use
 Moneydance, but will probably be transfering to Kapital soon.  It's cheaper
 than Moneydance, and looks nicer.

 Jim

 On Monday, November 19, 2001 9:33, Susan Macchia wrote:
 snip
  OT
  Just tried the latest Quicken 2002 and dislike it - so I may shift
  everything to either GNUcash or Moneydance (+ spreadsheet for budget) since
  I only do home finances w/ it.  My only issue is finding the time to make
  the shift. /OT
 
  [snip]


=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-19 Thread Jim Conner

If you need any help finding/installing it, let me know.  I just did this and 
it's a little tricky.  Ok, here's a quick SxS.
- Download korelib tarball and kapital rpm for distro.
- Untar korelib, ./configure, make, make install
- Edit /etc/ld.so.conf.  Add line: /usr/local/lib.  Run ldconfig as root.
- rpm -ivh --prefix=/opt/kde2 kapital-demo???.rpm
Notes:  You can change the --prefix to where ever kde is installed.  The 
initial screens are covered up by the annoying Kapital splash screen.  This 
can be remedied by moving/resizing the screen out of the splash screen's way. 
 This is a very dumbed down demo.  Some features will just send you to the 
Kapital web site when clicked on, but you can get the feel of how it will 
work.

Jim

On Monday, November 19, 2001 2:58, Susan Macchia wrote:
 Thanks - I'll check it out.

  Take a look at Kapital by theKompany.  There should be a demo rpm on
  their ftp site to look at.  It's very similar to Quicken.  I currently
  use Moneydance, but will probably be transfering to Kapital soon.  It's
  cheaper than Moneydance, and looks nicer.
 
  Jim
 
  On Monday, November 19, 2001 9:33, Susan Macchia wrote:
  snip
 
   OT
   Just tried the latest Quicken 2002 and dislike it - so I may shift
   everything to either GNUcash or Moneydance (+ spreadsheet for budget)
   since I only do home finances w/ it.  My only issue is finding the time
   to make the shift. /OT
  
   [snip]

 =
 _
 Susan Macchia
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _

 - Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
 http://personals.yahoo.com
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
 
  3:42pm  up 1 day, 46 min,  3 users,  load average: 0.30, 0.45, 0.46

Running Caldera W3.1 - Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-18 Thread Susan Macchia


 Regarding your writer (and mine).  I went to the vmware website and 
 found that they don't support burners, but treat them as readers only.  
 I can see both my reader (/dev/hdc) and my writer (/dev/ttyS0).  The 
 writer is scsi emulated, but both are really ide.  


OOPS neant that the write is /dev/sr0 not ttyS0.  Sorry for the typo!

=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-18 Thread Keith Antoine

On Monday 19 November 2001 02:54, Susan Macchia enunciated:
 I was running the full version (evaulation copy) and used the wizard to
 create the vm.  4G disk (which I could change, but left it).

The nice part about it is that although you created a 4gig file its only 
takes on the size of the loaded files, elastic partitioning g. Yes I left 
it at 4gig too as I am almost at the stage whereby I seldom use it.
Know of any good linux rippers (mpeg) and anything to take the place of
FlaskMpeg ?

 Regarding the com ports, I find that have to uninstall/re-install them
 after powering them down.  Wierd.  I can live w/ it for a while since I
 don't use it to sync my palm or download from my camera very often.  At
 some point I will have to figure out what the issue is and determine if its
 a bug or what.

Now thats is wierd, as I am on cable it sees out on the net and also ses the 
local files on linux on boot. I used to use it with early version 2.0 with a 
modem, it was fine.

 Regarding your writer (and mine).  I went to the vmware website and found
 that they don't support burners, but treat them as readers only.  I can see
 both my reader (/dev/hdc) and my writer (/dev/ttyS0).  The writer is scsi
 emulated, but both are really ide.

Well thyey are really Atapi-Scsi to start off with not really ide, however I
thought that , that would be the case. I can burn on Suse but I do like Nero 
and burning VCD's is in its infancy with linux but doable (all command line)

 I still haven't decided whether to fork up the $ for the full version or to
 go with the express, since I may not need win2k.  But I do think that I am
 going to give up on Win4Lin...

Did you miss out on the $89.00 special offer some months ago; yes I agree on 
win4lin, its to messy and no where as professional to vmware. BTW did you 
donload the full manual in pdf format ? quite extensive..

-- 
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-18 Thread Keith Antoine

On Monday 19 November 2001 03:07, Susan Macchia enunciated:
  Regarding your writer (and mine).  I went to the vmware website and
  found that they don't support burners, but treat them as readers only.
  I can see both my reader (/dev/hdc) and my writer (/dev/ttyS0).  The
  writer is scsi emulated, but both are really ide.

 OOPS neant that the write is /dev/sr0 not ttyS0.  Sorry for the typo!

Noticed it but as a matter of Gallantry, ignored it. Typical Oz bloke, took a 
leaf out of Kurt's bookgrin

-- 
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-18 Thread Susan Macchia

Keith Antione wrote:
 On Monday 19 November 2001 02:54, Susan Macchia enunciated:
  I was running the full version (evaulation copy) and used the wizard to
  create the vm.  4G disk (which I could change, but left it).

 The nice part about it is that although you created a 4gig file its only
 takes on the size of the loaded files, elastic partitioning g. Yes I left
 it at 4gig too as I am almost at the stage whereby I seldom use it.
 Know of any good linux rippers (mpeg) and anything to take the place of
 FlaskMpeg ?

Nope - haven't fooled around with mpeg files yet.


  Regarding the com ports, I find that have to uninstall/re-install them
  after powering them down.  Wierd.  I can live w/ it for a while since I
  don't use it to sync my palm or download from my camera very often.  At
  some point I will have to figure out what the issue is and determine if its
  a bug or what.

 Now thats is wierd, as I am on cable it sees out on the net and also ses the
 local files on linux on boot. I used to use it with early version 2.0 with a
 modem, it was fine.

Well, I have a cable modem, but use the serial port to sync my palm and for my
camera.  On windows, only use it for the palm when I need to update the
Daytimer addressbook.  I checked permissions on /dev/ttyS0 and they were ok. 
So at some point I'll have to figure out whats happenin' here.


  Regarding your writer (and mine).  I went to the vmware website and found
  that they don't support burners, but treat them as readers only.  I can see
  both my reader (/dev/hdc) and my writer (/dev/ttyS0).  The writer is scsi
  emulated, but both are really ide.

 Well thyey are really Atapi-Scsi to start off with not really ide, however I
 thought that , that would be the case. I can burn on Suse but I do like Nero
 and burning VCD's is in its infancy with linux but doable (all command line)

  I still haven't decided whether to fork up the $ for the full version or to
  go with the express, since I may not need win2k.  But I do think that I am
  going to give up on Win4Lin...

 Did you miss out on the $89.00 special offer some months ago; yes I agree on
 win4lin, its to messy and no where as professional to vmware. BTW did you
 donload the full manual in pdf format ? quite extensive..

Bummer, I missed it.  I was running RH 7.0 with win4lin so didn't need to try
anything else until my switch to SuSE.  Don't think I'll go back though.  It
would be nice if they had a single user single instance license of 3.0 like the
2.0 express.  I'd really like to keep win2k because I need to use Word for the
occasions when my boss ships me an Office2k .doc file that I need to read or
update (like our software project plan).  


=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



RE: Re: replacing win98

2001-11-18 Thread Susan Macchia

I am still evaluating VMware 3.0, but want to probably go with express.  Since
I am running 2.4.10 kernel (SuSE 7.3), what kind of work around might I have
to do?  I'd like to know before I fork up the dough.

TIA

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have given up on wn4lin as a longtime loyal user and have gone with
 VMware Express. Netraverse seemed to have gone after RH and MDK and as
 for SuSE, they always seem to lag behind. They even seem to stay more
 current for TurboLinux. I went with SuSE after COL 2.4, even though I
 looked @ RH7.1, MDK8 and MDK8.1 beta, SuSE seemed easier to transition
 to as a somewhat newbie. I have VMware express running with 96MB on a
 126 MB laptop and 160 MB on a 256 MB desktop. N problems, although
 you will need to do a work around for any kernel  2.4.7-4GB, BUT, you
 do not have to recompile your kernel to use it.

 Best Regards,

 Keith B.


=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-18 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Sunday 18 November 2001 22:13 pm, Susan Macchia wrote:
  Did you miss out on the $89.00 special offer some months ago; yes I agree
  on win4lin, its to messy and no where as professional to vmware. BTW did
  you donload the full manual in pdf format ? quite extensive..

 Bummer, I missed it.  I was running RH 7.0 with win4lin so didn't need to
 try anything else until my switch to SuSE.  Don't think I'll go back
 though.  It would be nice if they had a single user single instance license
 of 3.0 like the 2.0 express.  I'd really like to keep win2k because I need
 to use Word for the occasions when my boss ships me an Office2k .doc file
 that I need to read or update (like our software project plan).

Not sure what the reference to the $89 deal is   the only $89 I am aware 
of is the $89 I spent to upgrade from VMWare 2.0.4 workstation to  3.0 
Workstation.   I think that offer is still on but since you don't own a copy 
of  workstation..



-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 11/18/01 22:28  +
++
Never allow a repair to interfere with preventive maintenance.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Re: replacing win98

2001-11-18 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Sunday 18 November 2001 22:22 pm, Susan Macchia wrote:
 I am still evaluating VMware 3.0, but want to probably go with express.
  Since I am running 2.4.10 kernel (SuSE 7.3), what kind of work around
 might I have to do?  I'd like to know before I fork up the dough.

No workaround should be needed for any version of VMWare at the 3.x level.

The work around mentioned was for people running 2.0.x versions of VMware 
when they wanted to run  2.4.7 or greater kernels.  A small piece of new 
source was needed and it was readily available.  I still have it but you 
shouldn't need it.   I'm running vanilla  2.4.14  with 3.0 workstation and it 
installs just fine.


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 11/18/01 22:29  +
++
Welcome to the Microsoft tour.  Please don't feed the lawyers.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-17 Thread Susan Macchia

Hi Keith,

I do have a 2nd cd writer which VMware fails to see on initial installation.  I
set it up as a scsi cdrom device and I can read from it, but have yet not tried
to write to it.  Since I use gcombust, etc, it is a lower priority for me and I
haven't searched the website or asked them about support for it.  Also, I get
no sound.  But I really don't need it for those things yet.  I want to set up a
win98 version for my son to use his educational software with, and that will
need sound.  I'll let you know when I get to that point.

I also have problems with /dev/lp0, so for now I am using Samba to print, but I
eventually want to understand why it can't connect to that port.

Again, even with these limitations, the fact that it runs without booting into
a specialized kernel is a plus to me.  Not that I have time to roll my own, but
I want to be able to play without having to worry that I can't run my critical
window's apps.

Hope this helps

Keith Antoine wrote:

 On Saturday 17 November 2001 03:20, Susan Macchia enunciated:
 I would highly recommend VMware.  I just installed SuSE 7.3 (really slick
 by the way - I am real happy w/ it) and am evaluating VMware 3.0.  I have
 found that it is a really slick product; easy to configure and set up.  Its
 performance is pretty good (its running on a pentium II 400 mhz with 384MB
 of RAM).  Installation of the OS and any optional software is kind of slow,
 but other than that it is like a real small machine on the desktop.

 I've been recently using it to test my Samba configuration (so I don't have
 to kick my kids off they're win2k box).  I installed it with win2k.  It
 runs like a champ and I don't have to boot into a specialized kernel (like
 with Win4Lin).

 Hi Suuzz g

 Just want to talk a bit re Vmware and your config. Do you have the second,
 usually writer being seen by vmware ? Have you heard if a burner can operate
 in vmware as I have to burn my vcd's in nero on windows.

 I have managed to get quicktime, shockwave and many other plugins working on
 linux using codeweavers crossover. Nice to play the trailers form the apple
 site natively online at last.

 So I do not have the use for windows much now since the release of SO6, but I
 do need to use Flaskmpeg and TMPGEnc. As I only got my version 3.0 rego
 numbers today I have not had a chance to try these in vmware but am sure they
 will be very slow converting mpegs.


=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-17 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Saturday 17 November 2001 9:21 am, Susan Macchia wrote:
 Again, even with these limitations, the fact that it runs without booting
 into a specialized kernel is a plus to me.  Not that I have time to roll my
 own, but I want to be able to play without having to worry that I can't run
 my critical window's apps.

I'm curious as to what type of VMW disk you built and whether you had to 
format it.

I was using 2.0.4 and had one of their special 'plain' disks and I don't ever 
recall having to partition or format it.  It was 4GB in size.

Now, moving to 3.0, I built a new 'virtual' disk of 4.4GB and had to 
partition and format it before it was visible to VMW.  Didn't think that 
would be necessary.  But I was blown away by being able to run Partition 
Magic (virtually) to partition it.  Worked flawlessly by booting the PM 
diskettes.


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 11/17/01 10:31  +
++
Insomnia isn't anything to lose sleep over.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-17 Thread Keith Antoine

On Sunday 18 November 2001 00:21, Susan Macchia enunciated:
 Hi Keith,

 I do have a 2nd cd writer which VMware fails to see on initial
 installation.  I set it up as a scsi cdrom device and I can read from it,
 but have yet not tried to write to it.  Since I use gcombust, etc, it is a
 lower priority for me and I haven't searched the website or asked them
 about support for it.  Also, I get no sound.  But I really don't need it
 for those things yet.  I want to set up a win98 version for my son to use
 his educational software with, and that will need sound.  I'll let you know
 when I get to that point.

With the writer I can add it in but it sees the two dives but acts as if they 
ate one , real wierd. As for sound, I get broken or non in Mandrake 8.1, get 
sound in Suse but on reboot it looses it and I haver to reinstall in linux 
then is sees it on boot it might say its busy. not real worried here about 
either. 

 I also have problems with /dev/lp0, so for now I am using Samba to print,
 but I eventually want to understand why it can't connect to that port.

again i am not worried but it says its busy because lp0 is occupied by the 
linux printcap.

 Again, even with these limitations, the fact that it runs without booting
 into a specialized kernel is a plus to me.  Not that I have time to roll my
 own, but I want to be able to play without having to worry that I can't run
 my critical window's apps.

Yes, its fine as can and do run what I need from windows which is getting 
less and less. I have DVD and VCD's playing from linux now plus I can use 
quicktime, shockwave, see winword and excel from netscape with crossover.
Must say that its getting to the stage where I will not need to reboot to do 
what I want.


-- 
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-16 Thread Matthew Carpenter

I have spoken to several Linux-geeks who need occasional access to a windows box, and 
most are happy with the VNC setup you described (little headless NT/2000 box under the 
desk)

On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:30:35 -0500
Wade Barocsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 My office manager's win98 system is problematic, with frequent crashes, etc.  
 I am looking to replace this system with linux.  This system (k6-400,256mb) 
 runs a foxpro database-office management system, and basic office software. 
 The office software can easily be handled by linux, but what is the best 
 approach in operating the database?  VNC off a win2k box? A new virtual 
 machine in vmware run local or remote? Any thoughts?
 
 Thanks
 Wade
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-16 Thread Susan Macchia

I would highly recommend VMware.  I just installed SuSE 7.3 (really slick by
the way - I am real happy w/ it) and am evaluating VMware 3.0.  I have found
that it is a really slick product; easy to configure and set up.  Its
performance is pretty good (its running on a pentium II 400 mhz with 384MB of
RAM).  Installation of the OS and any optional software is kind of slow, but
other than that it is like a real small machine on the desktop. 

I've been recently using it to test my Samba configuration (so I don't have to
kick my kids off they're win2k box).  I installed it with win2k.  It runs like
a champ and I don't have to boot into a specialized kernel (like with Win4Lin).

It is a bit pricy though ($299 US).  They have an express version (win95/98
only) which is VMware 2.0 for only $49 US which I may decide to go for since I
really don't have to have win2k...

SO, if you don't want to buy and set up another box, but have enough memory and
horsepower in the linux-to-be box, that would be the route I would take.  IMHO 

 My office manager's win98 system is problematic, with frequent crashes, etc. 
 I am looking to replace this system with linux.  This system (k6-400,256mb)
 runs a foxpro database-office management system, and basic office software.
 The office software can easily be handled by linux, but what is the best
 approach in operating the database?  VNC off a win2k box? A new virtual
 machine in vmware run local or remote? Any thoughts? 

 Thanks
 Wade


=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-16 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Friday 16 November 2001 12:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The last time I tried VMware (it was version 2) they didn't support SB Live
 sound cards.  Their website wasn't very clear as to whether or not they
 have changed that.  Does anyone have a success  using VMware and a SB Live
 card?  I was also running it on a K2-300 with 128 MB ram and it was slow.
 Is my processor too slow or would more ram improve the performance (if so
 how much more)?  TIA

Not sure about the Live! issue  I'm using it with an Ensonique card from 
Creative.

As for being slow  make sure you give the WIN machine enough RAM.  I 
think the default was 49MB and it runs like a slug at that level.  I'm 
currently running it in 64MB virtual and it runs quite well.  When I first 
tried VMware, I was sorely disappointed but someone who was more familiar 
with it talked me into trying it with some tuning.   Changed my whole outlook 
on it.


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 11/16/01 15:19  +
++
Davis's Law:
   If a headline ends in a question mark, the answer is no.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-16 Thread Keith Antoine

On Saturday 17 November 2001 03:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] enunciated:
 The last time I tried VMware (it was version 2) they didn't support SB Live
 sound cards.  Their website wasn't very clear as to whether or not they
 have changed that.  Does anyone have a success  using VMware and a SB Live
 card?  I was also running it on a K2-300 with 128 MB ram and it was slow.
 Is my processor too slow or would more ram improve the performance (if so
 how much more)?  TIA

 Mark

U, I purchased version 3.0 when it was on special for $89.00 USD and its 
great. However there are caveats insofar as it does need the newer CPU's and 
lotsa memory to nbe useful. I have a 1.4 gig Athlon and DDR m/b plus 500mb 
ram. It runs almost natively with 98se onboard but the install IS slow. I can 
see the files on linux, can use the net, install programs as per usual and 
run them normally, it sees usb h/w etc. You do NEED to run in fullscreen for 
it to run natively though.

As far as I can see it does not see burners, but as far as the live is 
concerned it works in mine.

-- 
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-16 Thread Keith Antoine

On Saturday 17 November 2001 03:20, Susan Macchia enunciated:
 I would highly recommend VMware.  I just installed SuSE 7.3 (really slick
 by the way - I am real happy w/ it) and am evaluating VMware 3.0.  I have
 found that it is a really slick product; easy to configure and set up.  Its
 performance is pretty good (its running on a pentium II 400 mhz with 384MB
 of RAM).  Installation of the OS and any optional software is kind of slow,
 but other than that it is like a real small machine on the desktop.

 I've been recently using it to test my Samba configuration (so I don't have
 to kick my kids off they're win2k box).  I installed it with win2k.  It
 runs like a champ and I don't have to boot into a specialized kernel (like
 with Win4Lin).

Hi Suuzz g

Just want to talk a bit re Vmware and your config. Do you have the second, 
usually writer being seen by vmware ? Have you heard if a burner can operate 
in vmware as I have to burn my vcd's in nero on windows. 

I have managed to get quicktime, shockwave and many other plugins working on 
linux using codeweavers crossover. Nice to play the trailers form the apple 
site natively online at last.

So I do not have the use for windows much now since the release of SO6, but I 
do need to use Flaskmpeg and TMPGEnc. As I only got my version 3.0 rego 
numbers today I have not had a chance to try these in vmware but am sure they 
will be very slow converting mpegs.

-- 
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users