Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-27 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On 27 November 2011 19:53, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Derek Smithies derek.smith...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The usual media one has to backup is photos - which can easily be 100G (after some years of collection). So a backup solution has to be

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-27 Thread Hadley Rich
On 28/11/11 01:47, Christopher Sawtell wrote: The huge problem with 'the cloud' is that it is situated in the land of the TLA none of which have any respect whatsoever for the privacy of either you or your clients. Indeed this is a big issue, there are a couple of options as I see it; -

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-27 Thread Derek Smithies
On 27/11/11 16:25, Steve Holdoway wrote: Sorry Derek, I disagree. 100G over (for example) 2 years is 4GB/month. Easily manageable even at ADSL uplink speeds. Sure, it's going to take time to get your current collection up there, but once there, rsync will provide all you need for a minimal

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-27 Thread Jim Tittsler
On 2011-11-28 08:44, Hadley Rich wrote: Indeed this is a big issue, there are a couple of options as I see it; - Encrypt data before you send it up to S3 which is achievable but adds a bit more complexity than the sync-and-forget alternative. I use Duplicity, which nicely hides that

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-27 Thread Derek Smithies
On 28/11/11 01:47, Christopher Sawtell wrote: On 27 November 2011 19:53, Nick Rout nick.r...@gmail.com mailto:nick.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Derek Smithies Which leaves: External usb drive Run time machine (apple software) and

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-27 Thread don
I often feel like interrupting when I hear shop assistants talking to complete strangers. However the few times I have, it leads to a whole afternoon of discussion, I just keep quiet now. I am sure I have seen that on one of those 'you really know you are a geek when ...' lists. Re: Shop

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-26 Thread Derek Smithies
Hi, The usual media one has to backup is photos - which can easily be 100G (after some years of collection). So a backup solution has to be designed for 100 G. Dvds are too small, and slow to search. network based backups are too slow - DSL uplink is too slow - and the volume of data to

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-26 Thread Steve Holdoway
Sorry Derek, I disagree. 100G over (for example) 2 years is 4GB/month. Easily manageable even at ADSL uplink speeds. Sure, it's going to take time to get your current collection up there, but once there, rsync will provide all you need for a minimal overhead, given that Xtra are touting 100GB/mo

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-26 Thread dave lilley
(((This brings me to pet peeve #2. Users are told to do backups, but the sentence should be: 1)do backup 2)verify that you can take the backup media and restore to a new machine There are a legion of stories out there of people/firms who have regularly and reliably backed up to

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-26 Thread Nick Rout
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Derek Smithies derek.smith...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The usual media one has to backup is photos - which can easily be 100G (after some years of collection). So a backup solution has to be designed for 100 G. Dvds are too small, and slow to search. network

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-25 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Fri 25 Nov 2011 16:32:15 NZDT +1300, C. Falconer wrote: more ram is actually an environmentally friendly activity And its astonishingly cheap these days. That depends. If you have a new enough box with DDR3, yes. Otherwise, not so much. DDR2 mobos are still very common, and the memory

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-25 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Fri 25 Nov 2011 15:51:45 NZDT +1300, Derek Smithies wrote: The list has been quiet, time to start some correspondence on Pet peeves, The summer hole...? On asking the store attendant that you want more memory, they will look at you and try to tell you that there is enough memory in

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-25 Thread Derek Smithies
On 25/11/11 22:51, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: On asking the store attendant that you want more memory, they will look at you and try to tell you that there is enough memory in the box for your task at hand.. I don't quite understand your problem (maybe that's why it's a pet peeve?). If you know

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-25 Thread Ross Drummond
My form of entertainment is when you buy a computer or some peripheral and they try to up-sell you an anti-virus program. I pretend to be interested and ask them if they have a Linux version. My pet peeve is web pages that have many hundreds of images in them. Haven't they heard of CSS?

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-25 Thread Robert Fisher
On 26/11/11 09:04, Derek Smithies wrote: = As far as shop assistants go, I lost all faith in them a while ago. A shop assistant is not necessarily a salesperson. Rob ___ Linux-users mailing list

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-25 Thread Roger Searle
On 25/11/11 4:32 PM, C. Falconer wrote: Derek Smithies wrote, On 11/25/2011 03:51 PM: more ram is actually an environmentally friendly activity And its astonishingly cheap these days. I put 8GB of RAM in my current work desktop machine, htop tells me nearly all of it is allocated. Partly

Re: [Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-25 Thread Eliot Blennerhassett
Now that others have mentioned 'upselling' I haven't heard one salesperson mention the sad fact: you're going to put a few years worth of photos etc on this drive, and then it *is* going to fail, so you need some form of backup External hard drive? DVD writer? Amazon S3 subscription? ...

[Linux-users] Pet Peeve

2011-11-24 Thread Derek Smithies
Hi, The list has been quiet, time to start some correspondence on Pet peeves, which is (according to Wikipedia) a minor annoyance that an individual identifies as particularly annoying to him or her, to a greater degree than others may find it... You may have a different peeve, which should