[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 8/8] meta/common-pc-64: Add USB 3.0 support] On
06/09/2013 (Fri 15:44) Darren Hart wrote:
Add missing xhci-hcd to common-pc-64.scc.
At the risk of being a nag, the commit log just repeats what is obvious
from patch inspection. I try and encourage people to list three
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 3/8] meta/common-pc: Add common Realtek and Atheros
Ethernet drivers] On 06/09/2013 (Fri 15:44) Darren Hart wrote:
Add the 8139*, R8169, and ATL1E drivers per popular demand.
Are the Atheros things not wireless? Perhaps separate out the generic
COTS PCI ethernet cards
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 7/8] meta/common-pc*: Refactor common-pc-64 to reuse
common-pc drivers] On 06/09/2013 (Fri 15:44) Darren Hart wrote:
Factor out the x86_64 CPU-specific options into common-pc-64-cpu.cfg and
move any missing driver CONFIGs into common-pc-drivers.cfg. Reuse the
eth, wifi,
On 13-12-11 12:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 12:19 +0800, rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com
valleyisland-io.scc was updated with new patch added.
Signed-off-by: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
On 13-12-18 11:50 PM, Ravi Rao wrote:
Hi All,
We have a custom Board which is based on mpc8349EMDS which is based on e300.
I got the Toolchain downloaded using poky-dora-10.0.0 project which
supports e300 core
Now when I cross compile Linux kernel ver 2.6.32 the system boots up and
works
[Re: [linux-yocto] ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x3dbd bytes below 0x80.] On
19/12/2013 (Thu 15:24) Ravi Rao wrote:
Hi Paul,
Appreciate the feed back. My responses are in line below..
On 12/19/13 09:30, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-12-18 11:50 PM, Ravi Rao wrote:
Hi
On 14-07-28 10:58 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
From: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
commit e2b32e6785138d92d2a40e0d0473575c8c7310a2 upstream
Unless I missed it, it would be nice if these 3 patches had a 0/3
that had some context about what they are fixing and why they
are selected for cherry pick.
On 14-07-30 09:56 AM, Andreas Schultz wrote:
Hi,
Unstable might be not the right term, but I couldn't think of another.
The issue is that two builds on exactly the same build host, produce
packages that have different runtime dependencies and also different
behaviors.
This list is meant
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH v3] Meta: add qemuppc64 bsp config] On 30/08/2014 (Sat
23:03) Armin Kuster wrote:
This is the initial meta data for qemu ppc64 bsp that supports
the IBM pseries power* arch which is supported in Qemu.
V2: Pruned config
: Added standard.scc
V3: More cleanup
:
On 14-10-08 02:39 AM, Ong Boon Leong wrote:
There is an build issue in following merge-point:
Merge tag 'v3.10.48' into standard/base
60a9d9fc565e4503dbb8705803e83d906afc4ad2
For 8250_dw.c: dw8250_handle_irq() requires the following line
to be restored in order to build successfully.
cause info to commit log.]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
index 36fe9d9262c0..5caf10ee14b1 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
@@ -217,6
On 14-12-19 03:43 AM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
From: Lai Jiangshan la...@cn.fujitsu.com
worker_idr is highly bound to managers and is always/only accessed in manager
lock context. So we don't need pool-lock for it.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan la...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
[Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] stmicro: Add support for the STMMAC Ethernet controller
family] On 05/07/2015 (Sun 22:30) Saul Wold wrote:
On 07/05/2015 08:52 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-07-01 7:15 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 7/1/15 4:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
This is needed for the meta-quark BSP
On 2015-07-29 09:07 AM, Laurent Joli wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am try to build an recipe for asterisk 13.1.1 but I have some errors.
This list is primarily for kernel development.
https://www.yoctoproject.org/tools-resources/community/mailing-lists
Paul.
--
I will show you my recipe :
On 2015-08-05 03:44 PM, Cristian Bercaru wrote:
Hello!
Does linux-yocto-4.1 implement all the preempt-rt support in
standard/preempt-rt branch?
or
Does it have a preempt-rt patch, like 3.4, 3.10 and 3.14?
It has always been on a branch IIRC, and I don't think we've
ever used a monolithic
.2-rt5 (2016-06-26 18:01:55 -0400)
----
Paul Gortmaker (5):
powerpc:drop perf build fix now in mainline
treewide: re-export patches autonominated for refresh
kver: 4.6 ---> 4.6.1
treewide: re-export patches autonominated for refresh [4.6 --> 4.6.1]
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 23/29] acpi: updated DSDT table for SPI devices.] On
05/02/2016 (Fri 06:53) Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Ismo Puustinen
>
> ACPI version 5 assumes SPI devices to be under the SPI bus in the ACPI
> definitions.
In addition to my comments about the
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 25/29] staging:iio: add support for ADC1x8s102.] On
05/02/2016 (Fri 06:53) Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Todor Minchev
>
> Upstream-status: Pending
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
The patch pending for upstream doesn't have any commit
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 20/29] acpi: added a custom DSDT file.] On 05/02/2016
(Fri 06:53) Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Ismo Puustinen
>
> The file has fixed GPIO IRQ assignment.
>
> Upstream-status: Inappropriate, custom firmware
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 13/29] mfd: core: redo ACPI matching of the children
devices] On 05/02/2016 (Fri 06:53) Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko
>
> There is at least one board on the market, i.e. Intel Galileo Gen2, that uses
> _ADR to distinguish the
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 05/29] i2c: core: fix typo in comment] On 05/02/2016 (Fri
06:53) Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Shailendra Verma
>
> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
>
>
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 01/13] features/debug: add debug-kernel feature] On
04/02/2016 (Thu 16:25) California Sullivan wrote:
> Since EMBEDDED, EXPERT, and DEBUG_KERNEL are being removed from the base
> ktype, we can no longer assume DEBUG_KERNEL is enabled.
>
> Also add this fragment to features
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 06/13] intel-common-drivers.scc: move profiling and
latencytop to a new file] On 04/02/2016 (Thu 16:25) California Sullivan wrote:
> Profiling and latencytop enable DEBUG_KERNEL, which is no longer a
> standard config option. Move these features to a new file called
>
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 27/29] gpio-pca953x: add "drive" property.] On 05/02/2016
(Fri 06:53) Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Ismo Puustinen
>
> Galileo gen 2 has support for setting GPIO modes. Expose these
> properties through the GPIO sysfs interface. This approach is bit
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 29/29] ARM: dts: am335x-boneblack: configure i2c1 and 2]
On 05/02/2016 (Fri 06:53) Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Nishanth Menon
>
> Configure i2c1 and 2 at 400KHz.
Incomplete commit log. It should say why this is required and for what
hardware. As it is fairly
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 28/29] iio: light: add support for ROHM
BH1710/BH1715/BH1721/BH1750/BH1751 ambient light sensors] On 05/02/2016 (Fri
06:53) Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Tomasz Duszynski
>
> Add support for ROHM BH1710/BH1715/BH1721/BH1750/BH1751 ambient light
> sensors.
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 03/13] ktypes/base: Disable EMBEDDED and DEBUG_KERNEL] On
04/02/2016 (Thu 16:25) California Sullivan wrote:
> DEBUG_KERNEL should not be in the base ktype, as a production kernel
> may not necessarily want any debug turned on. EMBEDDED is also removed,
> as EMBEDDED selects
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 04/13] base.cfg: disable some HIDs] On 04/02/2016 (Thu
16:25) California Sullivan wrote:
> These options default to !EXPERT. Since we removed EXPERT from base,
> these became enabled, adding functionality and size that we do not need.
I wonder about the "do not need" part.
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 09/13] preempt-rt.scc: inlcude extended ktype instead of
standard] On 04/02/2016 (Thu 16:25) California Sullivan wrote:
> The extended ktype now has the functionality of the previous standard
> ktype. To keep preempt-rt's functionality consistent we must include
> extended.
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 11/13] CONFIG_I2C_I801: set option to yes in intel-core*
bsps] On 04/02/2016 (Thu 16:25) California Sullivan wrote:
> Without EXPERT, we hit a select on I2C_I801, forcing it to yes and
> causing a warning. Set I2C_I801 to yes, and if a bsp wants to build it
> as a module,
[[linux-yocto] [PATCH 12/13] bsp: add extended common-pc bsps] On 04/02/2016
(Thu 16:25) California Sullivan wrote:
> By using the extended ktype instead of standard, these bsps have the
> same functionality of the old -standard bsps.
Same here, if we don't use a ktype, vs. say a "devel"
[Cc trimmed of non-yocto folks to spare them the noise]
[Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 01/29] i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does
not have interrupt assigned] On 08/02/2016 (Mon 09:13) Saul Wold wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 17:09 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > [[linux-yocto]
[Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 02/13] ktypes: add extended ktype] On 10/02/2016 (Wed
20:37) Sullivan, California L wrote:
> On 02/08/2016 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 2016-02-07 6:14 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >> [[linux-yocto] [PATCH 02/13] ktypes: add extended kt
[[PATCH v2 00/12] bsp: add developer common-pc BSPs] On 12/02/2016 (Fri 17:42)
California Sullivan wrote:
> By using the developer ktype instead of standard, these BSPs have the
> same functionality of the old -standard BSPs.
>
> Signed-off-by: California Sullivan
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
The current v4.8.17 baseline was released at the same time as v4.9.2
stable. This means that we need to start looking at the v4.9.3 stable
content in terms of what makes sense for v4.8.x -- also since v4.9 was
completed well before v4.8.17 was done, we know we don't
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Continuing on the previously released v4.8.18 kernel, we now have
the appropriate content from 4.9.4 and 4.9.5 applied on top of that.
I've combined the two since 4.9.4 alone only contributed about 50
changesets; adding in the appropriate 4.9.5 content gets us to about
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Another week, another stable update. Continuing on the previously
released v4.8.19 kernel, we now have the appropriate content from 4.9.6
and 4.9.7 applied on top of our latest 4.8 baseline. Once again, I've
combined two 4.9.x which results in about 150 backported
[[linux-yocto] hid-multitouch driver missing from 4.8.3] On 28/03/2017 (Tue
16:13) Paul Knopf wrote:
> I am using meta-intel BSP's on a board that has a multitouch device, but it
> isn't working. I need hd-multitouch.c, specifically.
>
> I checked the local kernel that was built, but didn't see
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is yet another 4.8.x stable update. Continuing on the previously
released v4.8.20 kernel, we now have the appropriate content from 4.9.8
to 4.9.11 applied on top of our latest 4.8 baseline. Once again, I've
combined several 4.9.x which results in about 150
On 2017-04-17 08:31 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> busybox ping was hanging after 1 loop with 4.10.x/4.11.x kernel.
> ping was hanging waiting for alarm to expire.
> 4.10.x kernel intrdoduced new kernel config CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
> which needs to be enabled to enable calls timer_create, settimer,
> alarm
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is yet another 4.8.x stable update. Continuing on the previously
released v4.8.21 kernel, we now have the appropriate content from 4.9.12
to 4.9.14 applied on top of our latest 4.8 baseline. Once again, I've
combined several 4.9.x which results in about 170
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.8.x stable update. Continuing on top of the
previously released v4.8.24 kernel, we now have the appropriate content
from 4.9.22 to 4.9.24 (inclusive) applied on top of our latest 4.8
baseline. Once again, I've combined several 4.9.x which results in
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.8.x stable update. Continuing on top of the previously
released v4.8.22 kernel, we now have the appropriate content from 4.9.15
to 4.9.17 applied on top of our latest 4.8 baseline. Once again, I've
combined several 4.9.x which results in about 165
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.8.x stable update. Continuing on top of the
previously released v4.8.23 kernel, we now have the appropriate content
from 4.9.18 to 4.9.21 (inclusive) applied on top of our latest 4.8
baseline. Once again, I've combined several 4.9.x which results in
[[linux-yocto-4.8][PATCH] mm/workingset.c: fix implicit declaration of
__list_lru_init_key] On 22/09/2017 (Fri 15:48) California Sullivan wrote:
> __list_lru_init_key does not exist. We're looking for __list_lru_init as
> shown in the patch "26690f5 mm: workingset: fix premature shadow node
I
[Re: [linux-yocto-4.8][PATCH] mm/workingset.c: fix implicit declaration of
__list_lru_init_key] On 28/09/2017 (Thu 10:37) Cal Sullivan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/28/2017 07:53 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >[[linux-yocto-4.8][PATCH] mm/workingset.c: fix implicit declaration of
> &g
[v4.12.x - stable updates comprising v4.12.15] On 26/11/2017 (Sun 02:49) Paul
Gortmaker wrote:
> Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
>
> Here is the 1st 4.12.x stable update. Continuing on top of the final
> Greg KH released v4.12.14 kernel, we now have the appropriate content
> from 4.
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is the 1st 4.12.x stable update. Continuing on top of the final
Greg KH released v4.12.14 kernel, we now have the appropriate content
from 4.13.4 --> 4.13.5 (inclusive) applied on top of the GregKH
baseline.
Since the last 4.12 release was done at the same time
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is the 4th 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project. Continuing on top of the previous v4.12.17 kernel,
we now have the appropriate content from 4.13.14 --> 4.13.16 (inclusive)
applied on top of where we left off previously. It
Bruce,
It turns out that unfortunately a fix found in 4.13.6 was overlooked
for addition to 4.12 because the "Fixes:" tag was newer than the
4.12 kernel. However that doesn't allow for the fact that this fix
is a fix for a fix we backported to 4.12 already. This is a corner
case I can script an
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.8.x stable update. Continuing on top of the
previously released v4.8.25 kernel, we now have the appropriate content
from 4.9.25 --> 4.9.29 (inclusive) applied on top of the latest 4.8
baseline. Once again, I've combined several 4.9.x which results in
On 2017-11-21 12:41 AM, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Wind River has maintained meta-installer for several years,
> and now we want to contribute it to yocto community.
>
> This layer provides an installation program based on
> OE platform. The installation program is anaconda from
> fedora,
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is the 3rd 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project. Continuing on top of the previous v4.12.16 kernel,
we now have the appropriate content from 4.13.10 --> 4.13.13 (inclusive)
applied on top of where we left off previously. It
tion files external to the kernel-cache.
Note that we also hook the remaining patch chunk into the standard
ktype so that "rebase" branches (when created) will faithfully
mirror the content merged into the fast forward branches.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@win
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.23 kernel.
There are about 90 commits here, and for the 2nd release in a row, we
are with no real multi-commit topics, meaning things are
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.24 kernel.
This is also a good time to note that people using 4.12.x should be
getting their plans in place to moving to a newer kernel in
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.22 kernel.
There about 150 commits here, with no real multi-commit topics, meaning
things are returning to what is normal for a stable
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is the 5th 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.18 kernel.
As indicated in the previous release, the 4.13 source that was being
used as a reference for commits we'd want here has been
needs to be investigated…
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 1f1cb510
Two small fixlets for real world issues on standard/preempt-rt/base in
the linux-yocto-4.12 repository:
The 1st fixes an issue where the LTP testcase timerfd01 failed.
The second resolves a known issue where AUFS causes false positives
of a lockdep fail by claiming there are not enough classes.
iewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index fd26eade86a3..db396eafc774 100644
--- a/kernel/tim
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.19 kernel.
As hinted at in the previous release, there was a desire to clear the
queue of the stand-alone fixes to make room for more
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.26 kernel.
Hopefully people using 4.12.x are already getting their plans in place
to moving to a newer kernel in the near future, as the
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.27 kernel.
Hopefully people using 4.12.x have their plans well underway to move to
a newer kernel, as I have been indicating for several
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is the final 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.28 kernel.
After months of warning, hopefully it comes as no surprise to anyone
that this is the last 4.12.x release.
There are about
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.25 kernel.
And a reminder: people using 4.12.x should be getting their plans in
place to moving to a newer kernel in the near future, as
[Re: [linux-yocto] [PULL REQUEST] Intel Axxia updates to linux-yocto-4.12] On
23/01/2018 (Tue 15:57) Dragomir Daniel wrote:
>
> On 20.01.2018 04:18, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >[[linux-yocto] [PULL REQUEST] Intel Axxia updates to linux-yocto-4.12] On
> >18/01/2018 (Thu 20:0
[[linux-yocto] [PULL REQUEST] Intel Axxia updates to linux-yocto-4.12] On
18/01/2018 (Thu 20:03) Daniel Dragomir wrote:
> Hello Bruce!
>
> This is the first pull request for Axxia changes on kernel 4.12 which were
> ported from our 4.9 Yocto branches.
> I checked all the patches with
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.8.x stable update. Continuing on top of the
previously released v4.8.26 kernel, we now have content selected from
the 4.9.x series to address some of the high profile CVEs that have
garnered a lot of attention this year.
One departure of note, is
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is a quick 4.8.x stable update. There are only about 10 patches
here as this release is primarily to set the stage for better
compatibility with the existing preempt-rt content in Yocto.
To that end, I've tested it with the Yocto kernel-cache preempt-rt
patches
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.20 kernel.
There about 90 commits here, with the main thing being addition of the
mainline retpoline commits based on what was used for
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is another 4.12.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, continuing on top of the previous v4.12.21 kernel.
There about 125 commits here, with the main thing being addition of the
ARM/64 mainline retpoline commits based on what was used
the work performed under the lock
is well-bounded and minimal.
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: Guenter Roeck
Reported-and-tested-by: Steffen Trumtrar
Reported-by: Tim Sander
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
include/linux
RT
5c8919eed1cf kthread: convert worker lock to raw spinlock
5b0efb356a7b (tag: v4.18.12-rt6) v4.18.12-rt6
986610231899 Merge tag 'v4.18.12' into linux-4.18.y-rt
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localvers
of
quarantine_lock is confined to quarantine.c and the work performed while
the lock is held is limited.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
mm/kasan/quarantine.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions
HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
index ffbdc4642ea5
and resolves the warning.
Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
initialize the flags variable
Paul Gortmaker (1):
rt: update localversion to match latest content
drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 2 +-
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 8
include/linux/kthread.h | 2 +-
kernel/kthread.c| 42
u
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
fs/f2fs/inode.c | 25 +++--
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index cf0f944fcaea..75a85b3341a3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f
rn div_u64((u64)valid_user_blocks(sbi) * 100,
sbi->user_block_count);
Missing checks on sbi->user_block_count.
Reported-by: Wen Xu
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 13 -
1 file c
Bruce, yocto kernel folks,
Here is a group of mainline backports to our v4.18 standard/base that
address the following CVE items from this year:
CVE-2018-5391
CVE-2018-13096
CVE-2018-13097
CVE-2018-14610
CVE-2018-14611
CVE-2018-14612
CVE-2018-14613
I've applied them onto our standard/base at
(not yet available uptream).
Suggested-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Florian Westphal
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
include/uapi/linux/snmp.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 100
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 +
3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index d014af352ce0
From: Peter Oskolkov
commit 385114dec8a49b5e5945e77ba7de6356106713f4 upstream.
Tested: see the next patch is the series.
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Florian Westphal
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
combinations.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199839
Reported-by: Xu Wen
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff
-by: Jann Horn
Reported-by: Juha-Matti Tilli
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Florian Westphal
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 9 +-
include/net/inet_frag.h
199837
Reported-by: Xu Wen
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo
Reviewed-by: Su Yue
Reviewed-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 28 +++-
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ex
revent a lot of unexpected behavior (BUG_ON).
Reported-by: Xu Wen
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200403
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200407
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo
Reviewed-by: Su Yue
Reviewed-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by
ff-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 58 +-
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 9c0f9d7d4c73..e942f7be 100644
--- a/fs/
TIF_32BIT and fixup the assembly in one assembly file to
get it to compile again.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3
the kfree() and kcalloc() while the lock is dropped.
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Frank Rowand
Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
drivers/of/base.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Marc Zyngier
commit 4a0819bb25d12d39c0390636122eefba232596c1 from linux-rt-devel.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
[bigeasy: backport commit effe377d415 ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Move pending
table allocation to init time")]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-of
r.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
drivers/staging/android/vsoc.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/vsoc.c b/drivers/staging/android/vsoc.c
index 806beda1040b..6c7f666c0e33 100644
---
-by: Bernhard Landauer
Reported-by: Ralf Ramsauer
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h b/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h
index 72eaba3d50fc..797f07918197 100644
() (and we can have multiple jobs running on
NUMA systems).
Fixes: fcc6354365015 ("rcu: Make expedited GPs handle CPU 0 being
offline")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed
tch.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index 6f206be67cd2..0efe7ba1930e 100644
--- a/localversion-rt
+++ b/localversion-rt
@@ -1 +1 @@
--rt1
+-rt5
--
2.1
places).
Nevertheless I'm dropping that shift by zero to keep smatch quiet.
Cc: Daniel Wagner
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
kernel/sched/swork.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/swork.c b/kernel/sched
to init time
Mike Galbraith (1):
sched: Allow pinned user tasks to be awakened to the CPU they pinned
Paul Gortmaker (1):
rt: bump localversion
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (6):
staging: android: vsoc: use hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack()
powerpc: correct the preempt-lazy assembly
Drivers
kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 530118fbfe21..7d789c1b316b 100644
--- a/ke
Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is the next 4.18.x stable update "extension" primarily created
for the Yocto project, continuing from the previous v4.18.22 release.
There are about 235 commits here, based on commits chosen from what
was used in existing 4.19.9 to 4.19.11 (inclusive) stable
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo