Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Linux-Zigbee and Contiki

2010-10-27 Thread Mariano Alvira
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:00:18AM +0200, Wolf-Bastian Pöttner wrote: > Am 26.10.10 11:19, schrieb Pierre-emmanuel Goudet: > > Contiki uses custom MAC mechanisms for communication which mostly rely > on the fact, that all nodes have unique 16 bit addresses. This is true. sicslowmac, however, is

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Linux-Zigbee and Contiki

2010-10-27 Thread Pierre-emmanuel Goudet
Hi Bastian, Some opinions ... not real definitive answers below. Le 27/10/2010 10:00, Wolf-Bastian Pöttner a écrit : >From the conceptual point of view, the situation is as follows: > > Linux-zigbee uses the IEEE 802.15.4 MAC mechanisms. This includes the > necessity to attach to a PAN to r

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Linux-Zigbee and Contiki

2010-10-27 Thread Wolf-Bastian Pöttner
Am 26.10.10 11:19, schrieb Pierre-emmanuel Goudet: >Hi Bastian, > > I may not understand well the question. > > But on our side we use the embedded MAC implementation inside our > transceiver. And "nullmac (which does nothing)" inside Contiki. > Then as an example i can use the serial driver im

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Linux-Zigbee and Contiki

2010-10-26 Thread Pierre-emmanuel Goudet
Hi Bastian, I may not understand well the question. But on our side we use the embedded MAC implementation inside our transceiver. And "nullmac (which does nothing)" inside Contiki. Then as an example i can use the serial driver implementation of linux zigbee, and sniff raw 802.15.4 frames wi

[Linux-zigbee-devel] Linux-Zigbee and Contiki

2010-10-25 Thread Wolf-Bastian Pöttner
Hey guys, the iMote 2 sensor nodes make a pretty good gateway between a sensor network and a conventional network when you equip it with a Wifi card. However, in order to get data off the sensor network, I need the iMote to speak to Contiki over 802.15.4. For efficiency reasons, I do not want