> Tried it again and the firmware hung instead of rebooting. Is something
> else supposed to happen on the iPod?
In other words: the exploit worked. It should connect via USB then, but
that apparently doesn't work yet. You'll need to figure out why. ;-)
__
On 7/10/2010 1:03 PM, The Seven wrote:
>> O.K. I've tried it on 1.0.1 and 1.0.3 and neither build works. I might
>> try to find a copy of 1.0.2 later.
>>
> It will ONLY work on 1.0.3. If it doesn't work there, there's something
> wrong with the html file.
>
> _
> O.K. I've tried it on 1.0.1 and 1.0.3 and neither build works. I might
> try to find a copy of 1.0.2 later.
It will ONLY work on 1.0.3. If it doesn't work there, there's something
wrong with the html file.
___
Linux4nano-dev mailing list
Linux4nano-d
On 7/10/2010 3:54 AM, The Seven wrote:
>> It's failing. I'm using firmware version 1.1.2 and can't get iTunes to
>> downgrade it. I may have to find an old copy of iTunes.
>>
> http://l4n.clustur.com/index.php/Firmware_downgrading
>
> ___
> Linux4na
> It's failing. I'm using firmware version 1.1.2 and can't get iTunes to
> downgrade it. I may have to find an old copy of iTunes.
http://l4n.clustur.com/index.php/Firmware_downgrading
___
Linux4nano-dev mailing list
Linux4nano-dev@gna.org
https://mail
On 7/9/2010 6:34 PM, The Seven wrote:
>> Yeah, that is how I got the malfunctioning loader off. I have an 80 GB
>> classic.
>>
> The provided loader.htm is failing?
> Are you using firmware version 1.0.3?
>
> ___
> Linux4nano-dev mailing list
> Linu
> Yeah, that is how I got the malfunctioning loader off. I have an 80 GB
> classic.
The provided loader.htm is failing?
Are you using firmware version 1.0.3?
___
Linux4nano-dev mailing list
Linux4nano-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nan
On 7/9/2010 4:29 PM, The Seven wrote:
>> Didn't notice there was already a built copy. They look completely
>> different when opened by a web browser so it is probably my build that
>> has the error. I will test yours when I get the chance. What would the
>> core do if it worked? Will I be able to
> Didn't notice there was already a built copy. They look completely
> different when opened by a web browser so it is probably my build that
> has the error. I will test yours when I get the chance. What would the
> core do if it worked? Will I be able to get the working loader off my iPod?
It
On 7/9/2010 3:57 PM, The Seven wrote:
>> Putting just the loader on it was causing a continual reboot. I don't
>> know what to do with the core, and am I supposed to delete everything
>> else on the iPod or just in the notes folder?
>>
> No, just in the notes folder.
>
> The core for the clas
> Putting just the loader on it was causing a continual reboot. I don't
> know what to do with the core, and am I supposed to delete everything
> else on the iPod or just in the notes folder?
No, just in the notes folder.
The core for the classic won't work yet, it's copied from some other
ipod
On 7/9/2010 8:42 AM, alex wrote:
> On 7/9/2010 3:40 AM, The Seven wrote:
>
>>> Now that I have the compiled files, how do I use them?
>>>
>>>
>> Copy the loader.htm file to the notes directory on your ipod and remove
>> everything else from it, then safely remove and unplug your ipod.
>
On 7/9/2010 3:40 AM, The Seven wrote:
>> Now that I have the compiled files, how do I use them?
>>
> Copy the loader.htm file to the notes directory on your ipod and remove
> everything else from it, then safely remove and unplug your ipod.
> The firmware will lock up and iBugger will try to
> Now that I have the compiled files, how do I use them?
Copy the loader.htm file to the notes directory on your ipod and remove
everything else from it, then safely remove and unplug your ipod.
The firmware will lock up and iBugger will try to connect via USB.
Plug it again, and try to figure out
On 7/8/2010 2:04 PM, alex wrote:
> On 7/8/2010 1:52 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
>
>> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=windows+add+to+system+path
>>
>> 2010/7/8 alex:
>>
>>
>>> On 7/8/2010 1:36 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
>>>
>>>
You probably don't have your paths set up correctly. You need to add
On 7/8/2010 1:52 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=windows+add+to+system+path
>
> 2010/7/8 alex:
>
>> On 7/8/2010 1:36 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
>>
>>> You probably don't have your paths set up correctly. You need to add
>>> the MinGW binary directory to your system's path.
>>>
>
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=windows+add+to+system+path
2010/7/8 alex :
> On 7/8/2010 1:36 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
>> You probably don't have your paths set up correctly. You need to add
>> the MinGW binary directory to your system's path.
>>
>> 2010/7/8 alex:
>>
>>> On 7/8/2010 10:46 AM, The Seven wrote:
On 7/8/2010 1:36 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
> You probably don't have your paths set up correctly. You need to add
> the MinGW binary directory to your system's path.
>
> 2010/7/8 alex:
>
>> On 7/8/2010 10:46 AM, The Seven wrote:
>>
Okay, I fixed that problem. the makefile was having it
You probably don't have your paths set up correctly. You need to add
the MinGW binary directory to your system's path.
2010/7/8 alex :
> On 7/8/2010 10:46 AM, The Seven wrote:
>>> Okay, I fixed that problem. the makefile was having it look in the wrong
>>> place. I got the core to compile, but I c
On 7/8/2010 10:46 AM, The Seven wrote:
>> Okay, I fixed that problem. the makefile was having it look in the wrong
>> place. I got the core to compile, but I can't compile the loader and
>> sramloader. I get:
>>
>> gcc -o bin2htm bin2htm.c
>> make: gcc: Command not found
>> make: *** [bin2htm] Erro
> Okay, I fixed that problem. the makefile was having it look in the wrong
> place. I got the core to compile, but I can't compile the loader and
> sramloader. I get:
>
> gcc -o bin2htm bin2htm.c
> make: gcc: Command not found
> make: *** [bin2htm] Error 127
>
> Is this another makefile problem
>>> Did I do something wrong? This is what I get when I try to compile.
>>>
>>> /Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
>>> (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> D:\...\ibugger\classic\core>make clean
>>> rm -f *.lst core.map init.o main.o strlen.o sprintf.o core.bin core.
On 7/8/2010 3:20 AM, nuku wrote:
> Hi alex,
>
> well, it tells you what's wrong:
> c:/devkitPro/msys/cygdrive/c/programme/gnuarm/lib/gcc/arm-elf/4.1.1/libgcc.a:
> No such file: No such file or directory
> You somehow don't have a libgcc. Does the folder even exist and if so,
> is it empty?
> Probab
Hi alex,
well, it tells you what's wrong:
c:/devkitPro/msys/cygdrive/c/programme/gnuarm/lib/gcc/arm-elf/4.1.1/libgcc.a:
No such file: No such file or directory
You somehow don't have a libgcc. Does the folder even exist and if so,
is it empty?
Probably you don't have a gcc for arm?
On Thu, Jul 8,
On 7/7/2010 4:41 PM, alex wrote:
> On 7/7/2010 3:37 PM, The Seven wrote:
>
>>> Is there an easy way to get and install this? I've looked in cygwin's
>>> setup and can't find it as an option. I've also looked in Mint 9's
>>> software manager and can't find it there either. Is it part of another
On 7/7/2010 3:37 PM, The Seven wrote:
>> Is there an easy way to get and install this? I've looked in cygwin's
>> setup and can't find it as an option. I've also looked in Mint 9's
>> software manager and can't find it there either. Is it part of another
>> package?
>>
> No need for cygwin: h
> Is there an easy way to get and install this? I've looked in cygwin's
> setup and can't find it as an option. I've also looked in Mint 9's
> software manager and can't find it there either. Is it part of another
> package?
No need for cygwin: http://www.yagarto.de/
I've been using that all th
I think its in the Debian repositories as arm-elf-binutils.
2010/7/7 alex :
> On 7/7/2010 2:29 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
>> you need a compiler for the ARM architecture such as arm-elf-gcc, not
>> the normal gcc.
>>
>> 2010/7/7 alex:
>>
>>> On 7/7/2010 2:18 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
>>>
Alex, what
On 7/7/2010 2:29 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
> you need a compiler for the ARM architecture such as arm-elf-gcc, not
> the normal gcc.
>
> 2010/7/7 alex:
>
>> On 7/7/2010 2:18 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
>>
>>> Alex, what code are you trying to compile? My experience with cygwin
>>> was just a hass
you need a compiler for the ARM architecture such as arm-elf-gcc, not
the normal gcc.
2010/7/7 alex :
> On 7/7/2010 2:18 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
>> Alex, what code are you trying to compile? My experience with cygwin
>> was just a hassle. What's the point of using cygwin when linux is
>> freely ava
On 7/7/2010 2:18 PM, Cory Walker wrote:
> Alex, what code are you trying to compile? My experience with cygwin
> was just a hassle. What's the point of using cygwin when linux is
> freely available?
>
> 2010/7/7 alex:
>
>> On 7/4/2010 10:57 AM, The Seven wrote:
>>
>>> They have already fi
Alex, what code are you trying to compile? My experience with cygwin
was just a hassle. What's the point of using cygwin when linux is
freely available?
2010/7/7 alex :
> On 7/4/2010 10:57 AM, The Seven wrote:
>> They have already fixed that anyways, it was discovered and used by some
>> iPhone ha
On 7/4/2010 10:57 AM, The Seven wrote:
> They have already fixed that anyways, it was discovered and used by some
> iPhone hackers long ago (called pwnage 2.0 IIRC). However, as the bug is
> sitting in the mask ROM, they can't patch it.
>
> Planetbeing was kind enough to adapt that exploit for us a
Okay thanks. I'll look at that today when I get back. I'll also take a
look at those Python utilities you wrote.
2010/7/4 The Seven :
> They have already fixed that anyways, it was discovered and used by some
> iPhone hackers long ago (called pwnage 2.0 IIRC). However, as the bug is
> sitting in t
They have already fixed that anyways, it was discovered and used by some
iPhone hackers long ago (called pwnage 2.0 IIRC). However, as the bug is
sitting in the mask ROM, they can't patch it.
Planetbeing was kind enough to adapt that exploit for us and write a
tool to automate patching of the sign
Would it be possible to write a wiki page about the new method of
execution you discovered? It would help people who wanted to
experiment (including me, whose summer is just starting). I understand
if keeping it secret from Apple is a priority, but considering it is
not applicable on the 5G I doubt
Huh? We have execution up to the 3G classic and 4G nano. Only the 5G
nano is yet to be exploited.
Am 04.07.2010 12:00, schrieb tof:
> Hello guys
>
>
> Concerning the latest classics and nanos, we currently don't have code
> execution.
> However, we have some small idea what to do to get it, but
Hello guys
Concerning the latest classics and nanos, we currently don't have code
execution.
However, we have some small idea what to do to get it, but we still need the
help from SW reverse engineer people.
Christoph
Finn Wilke a écrit :
> It is not that easy. This is some AES public/privat
On 6/30/2010 2:48 PM, Finn Wilke wrote:
> Me too :-P
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:47 PM, alex wrote:
>
>> On 6/30/2010 2:44 PM, Finn Wilke wrote:
>>
>>> It is not that easy. This is some AES public/private key encryption scheme
>>> IIRC.
>>> As we don't know any of those keys we can't
Me too :-P
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:47 PM, alex wrote:
> On 6/30/2010 2:44 PM, Finn Wilke wrote:
>> It is not that easy. This is some AES public/private key encryption scheme
>> IIRC.
>> As we don't know any of those keys we can't encrypt anything at all
>> for all iPods since 2007 I think.
>>
On 6/30/2010 2:44 PM, Finn Wilke wrote:
> It is not that easy. This is some AES public/private key encryption scheme
> IIRC.
> As we don't know any of those keys we can't encrypt anything at all
> for all iPods since 2007 I think.
> Also nobody knows yet how to talk to the encryption engine on the
It is not that easy. This is some AES public/private key encryption scheme IIRC.
As we don't know any of those keys we can't encrypt anything at all
for all iPods since 2007 I think.
Also nobody knows yet how to talk to the encryption engine on the nano
6g (correct me if I'm wrong), so we can't acc
Hi,
I was wanting to poke around in the 6G's firmware. I was wondering what
encryption/decryption software to use, and what the encryption is.
___
Linux4nano-dev mailing list
Linux4nano-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
http://www
43 matches
Mail list logo
