jtd wrote:
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 01:33, Rajeev R. K. wrote:
There are many angles that you can approach your querstion, but i
will focus on 2 of them. Please be patient, as my post will be
long. Rest assured, you will see how it all relates to your
question by the end, and will
Rajeev R. K. wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 13:04:51 scrapo wrote:
Interesting
the Original Poster must be wondering what is happening.
He asked a newbie question - If i am writing code and someone else can
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:39 AM, jtd j...@mtnl.net.in wrote:
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 01:33, Rajeev R. K. wrote:
There are many angles that you can approach your querstion, but i
will focus on 2 of them. Please be patient, as my post will be
long. Rest assured, you will see how it all
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:19 PM, jtd j...@mtnl.net.in wrote:
So I guess I cannot simply dictate the code and distribute the ogg
;)
Or could I... I'll be using a DVD to distribute anyway right...
I do hope you dont sound like snoop dogg or horrors Britney spears.
Yeah thanks a lot. Now
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 01:01, Aasif Shaikh wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to GNU/Linux and Open Source world. I had seen lots of
open source stable projects on internet, which anybody can
download, modify and sell to anybody.
Now the question arises; if a *PERSON A* develops a stable and good
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 08:05:10 Mitul Limbani wrote:
Moreover GPL hasn't yet been challenged in Indian court of laws, you
are a lawyer if I m not wrong,
was
are you aware of any such incidents?
no
Interesting
the Original Poster must
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 10:28:03 Dinesh Joshi wrote:
As for preferring BSD... that's your choice to make.
A bad choice though! Lest you want to work for free for companies such
as Apple :)
do you mean the developers of postgresql and all the hundreds of projects of
the apache foundation
Aasif Shaikh wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to GNU/Linux and Open Source world. I had seen lots of open
source stable projects on internet, which anybody can download, modify
and sell to anybody.
Now the question arises; if a *PERSON A* develops a stable and good
project as an Open Source and
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 08:18:26 Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
GPL doesn't restrict someone to sell a gpl software to others, just
that the buyer is not aware of the 4 freedoms he is entitled with.
As I understand, with GPL, all you need to do when you sell
On 10/03/09 9:15 PM, Kartik Mistry kartik.mis...@gmail.com wrote:
Atleast, apache comes default installed with Mac OS X and you don't
notice it unless you dig a bit :)
I have found it increasingly difficult to use the default install of apache
on OS X for PHP dev. If you have to use the gd
On Tuesday 10 Mar 2009, Aasif Shaikh wrote:
I am new to GNU/Linux and Open Source world. I had seen lots of open
source stable projects on internet, which anybody can download,
modify and sell to anybody.
Now the question arises; if a *PERSON A* develops a stable and good
project as an Open
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 13:04:51 scrapo wrote:
Interesting
the Original Poster must be wondering what is happening.
He asked a newbie question - If i am writing code and someone else can
use it without paying me for
Hi All,
I am new to GNU/Linux and Open Source world. I had seen lots of open
source stable projects on internet, which anybody can download, modify
and sell to anybody.
Now the question arises; if a *PERSON A* develops a stable and good
project as an Open Source and upload it over the
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Aasif Shaikh aasif.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to GNU/Linux and Open Source world. I had seen lots of open
source stable projects on internet, which anybody can download, modify
and sell to anybody.
Now the question arises; if a *PERSON A*
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 01:01:31 Aasif Shaikh wrote:
Now the question arises; if a *PERSON A* develops a stable and good
project as an Open Source and upload it over the internet and the
*PERSON B* from some other country downloads and modify it with his name
as an author (basically he is
Kenneth,
On 10-Mar-09, at 6:12, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 01:01:31 Aasif Shaikh wrote:
Now the question arises; if a *PERSON A* develops a stable and good
project as an Open Source and upload it over the internet and the
*PERSON B* from some other
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Mitul Limbani mi...@enterux.com wrote:
GPL doesn't restrict someone to sell a gpl software to others, just
that the buyer is not aware of the 4 freedoms he is entitled with.
As I understand, with GPL, all you need to do when you sell software
is to make the
At 08:18 AM 3/10/2009, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Mitul Limbani mi...@enterux.com wrote:
GPL doesn't restrict someone to sell a gpl software to others, just
that the buyer is not aware of the 4 freedoms he is entitled with.
As I understand, with GPL, all you
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 08:18:26 Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
GPL doesn't restrict someone to sell a gpl software to others, just
that the buyer is not aware of the 4 freedoms he is entitled with.
As I understand, with GPL, all you need to do when you sell software
is to make the code of the
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 08:05:10 Mitul Limbani wrote:
Moreover GPL hasn't yet been challenged in Indian court of laws, you
are a lawyer if I m not wrong,
was
are you aware of any such incidents?
no
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate
NRC-FOSS
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
--
On Tuesday 10 Mar 2009, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 08:18:26 Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
GPL doesn't restrict someone to sell a gpl software to others,
just that the buyer is not aware of the 4 freedoms he is entitled
with.
As I understand, with GPL, all you need
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 09:01:56 Raj Mathur wrote:
As I understand, with GPL, all you need to do when you sell
software is to make the code of the software available to the
buyer.
and to anyone else who asks for it
No, only to people you distribute the software to. If I give a GPL
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh.poyare...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand, with GPL, all you need to do when you sell software
is to make the code of the software available to the buyer. In case of
some embedded products, the code is available as downloads from
On Tuesday 10 Mar 2009, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 09:01:56 Raj Mathur wrote:
As I understand, with GPL, all you need to do when you sell
software is to make the code of the software available to the
buyer.
and to anyone else who asks for it
No, only
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Raj Mathur r...@linux-delhi.org wrote:
As for preferring BSD... that's your choice to make.
A bad choice though! Lest you want to work for free for companies such
as Apple :)
--
Regards,
Dinesh A. Joshi
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
quote
2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it,
thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such
modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above,
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 08:29, Prashant Verma wrote:
At 08:18 AM 3/10/2009, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Mitul Limbani mi...@enterux.com
wrote:
GPL doesn't restrict someone to sell a gpl software to others,
just that the buyer is not aware of the 4 freedoms
Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
I would have thought that third parties would mean people you
distribute the modified software to and not the entire world.
Third Party as described by the WordNet is someone other than the
principals who are involved in a transaction. So it can mean the entire
On Tuesday 10 Mar 2009, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
[snip]
I would have thought that third parties would mean people you
distribute the modified software to and not the entire world.
Precisely. Your only obligation for source is to people who directly
got the software from you. You are not
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:18:26AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
snip
the code available to the person he sold the software to. He could
even do it on paper if he wants to :)
Actually, you are expected to deliver it in computer readable form.
With open source, the business model changes
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Nachiketa Sadhu sa...@iitb.ac.in wrote:
Third Party as described by the WordNet is someone other than the
principals who are involved in a transaction. So it can mean the entire
world.
True, but it would be more on the lines of someone other than the
involved
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Devdas Bhagat
dev...@dvb.homelinux.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:18:26AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
snip
the code available to the person he sold the software to. He could
even do it on paper if he wants to :)
Actually, you are expected to
32 matches
Mail list logo
