Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 13:23 -0500 schrieb Scott Wood:
Sergej Stepanov wrote:
+ if( !of_address_to_resource(np, 1, res[1])) {
The spacing is still wrong.
- iounmap(bitbang-dir);
+ if ( bitbang-mdio.dir != bitbang-mdc.dir)
+ iounmap(bitbang-mdio.dir);
+
The patch makes possible to have mdio and mdc pins on different physical ports
also for CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING.
To setup it in the device tree:
reg = 10d40 14 10d60 14; // mdc: 0x10d40, mdio: 0x10d60
or
reg = 10d40 14; // mdc and mdio have the same offset 10d40
The approach was taken from
Sergei Shtylyov writes:
+ /*
+* The classic decrementer interrupts at 0 to -1 transition, while
+* 40x and book E decrementers interrupt at 1 to 0 transition.
Funky spacing . : )
If I take out the removed lines in the rest of your patch, I get:
+*/
The decrementer in Book E and 4xx processors interrupts on the
transition from 1 to 0, rather than on the 0 to -1 transition as on
64-bit server and 32-bit classic (6xx/7xx/7xxx) processors. At the
moment we subtract 1 from the count of how many decrementer ticks are
required before the next
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:45:11 +0300
Valentine Barshak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following patches add PowerPC 440GRx Rainier board support.
The board is almost identical to Sequoia, but doesn't have USB
and FPU is not supported.
So why do we need anything other than
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:57:39 +0300 Valentine Barshak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/rainier.c 2007-10-30
18:00:15.0 +0300
+#include linux/init.h
+#include asm/machdep.h
+#include asm/prom.h
+#include asm/udbg.h
Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:08:05AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:56:50PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote:
PowerPC 440GRx Rainier DTS.
[snip]
+ SDRAM0: sdram {
+ device_type = memory-controller;
How many times do we
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:21:13 +0300
Valentine Barshak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:45:11 +0300
Valentine Barshak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following patches add PowerPC 440GRx Rainier board support.
The board is almost identical to Sequoia, but
David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
Jon Loeliger wrote:
So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
Jon,
It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a submodule of
the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.) might make some sense
Hello.
Paul Mackerras wrote:
If I take out the removed lines in the rest of your patch, I get:
+*/
#if defined(CONFIG_40x)
mtspr(SPRN_PIT, val);
+#else
+#if !defined(CONFIG_BOOKE)
+ val = val ? val - 1 : 0;
+#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_8xx_CPU6)
Grant == Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Grant From: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grant Change the wait_tx routine to call cpu_relax() instead of udelay() to
Grant reduce console output latency and test for the TXFULL bit instead of
Grant TXEMPTY. That way the FIFO doesn't
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:28 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:19:11 -0800
Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi KAME,
As I mentioned while ago, ppc64 does not export information about
system RAM in /proc/iomem. Looking at the code and usage
scenerios I am
Hi Paul/Andrew,
Here are few minor fixes needed to get hotplug memory remove working
on ppc64. Could you please consider them for -mm ?
[PATCH 1/3] Add remove_memory() for ppc64
[PATCH 2/3] Enable hotplug memory remove for ppc64
[PATCH 3/3] Add arch-specific
Enable hotplug memory remove for ppc64.
Signed-off-by: Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.23/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
===
---
Supply arch specific remove_memory() for PPC64. There is nothing
ppc specific code here and its exactly same as ia64 version.
For now, lets keep it arch specific - so each arch can add
its own special things if needed.
Signed-off-by: Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Grant Likely
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:09 AM
To: linuxppc-dev; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Refactor booting-without-of.txt
Adding the Linux expected device tree bindings to
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:02:40 -0800
Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul's concern is, since we didn't need it so far - why we need this
for hotplug memory remove to work ? It might break API for *unknown*
applications. Its unfortunate that, hotplug memory add updates
/proc/iomem. We
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:31:02AM -0700, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
This works...but certainly is weaker with respect to
standardization. My previous argument had the assumption
that something like mac-address in a network node was
_required_, and thus needed a class id of some sort to tie
[powerpc] update xmon slb code
This adds a bit more detail to the xmon SLB output. When the valid bit is
set, This displays the ESID and VSID values, as well as decoding the
segment size, (1T or 256M) and displaying the LLP bits. This supresses the
output for any slb entries that contain only
Could you redo the patch with just this bit and send it again?
josh
Ok - this one is based off the Linus tree, and follows your style of one
interrupt per line, with a comment indicating which one it is.
Signed-off-by: Steve Falco sfalco at harris.com
diff --git
-Original Message-
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:06 PM
To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
Cc: David Gibson; Olof Johansson; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: RFC: replace device_type with new class property?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:31:02AM -0700,
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Supply arch specific remove_memory() for PPC64. There is nothing
ppc specific code here and its exactly same as ia64 version.
For now, lets keep it arch specific - so each arch can add
its own special things if needed.
Signed-off-by:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:40 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
Jon Loeliger wrote:
So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
Jon,
It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a
submodule of
the things that need it (dtc,
Hi all,
We've got some kernel code that monitors which pages have been dirtied
by an application.
The pages are locked in memory, and the system has no swap. Initially
we mark the pages clean using ptep_clear_flush_dirty(), then when
requested by the app we scanning through the pages and
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 01:26 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Supply arch specific remove_memory() for PPC64. There is nothing
ppc specific code here and its exactly same as ia64 version.
For now, lets keep it arch specific - so each arch can
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 08:49 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+int remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
+{
+ unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
+ unsigned long timeout = 120 * HZ;
+ int ret;
+ start_pfn = start PAGE_SHIFT;
+ end_pfn =
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 13:45 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 08:49 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+int remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
+{
+ unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
+ unsigned long timeout = 120 * HZ;
+ int ret;
+
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 13:45 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 08:49 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+int remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
+{
+ unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
+ unsigned long timeout = 120 * HZ;
+ int ret;
+
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 01:26 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Supply arch specific remove_memory() for PPC64. There is nothing
ppc specific code here and its exactly same as ia64 version.
For now, lets keep it arch
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:17:44PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
Oops. The original patch happened to hit the Junk mail box. :(
That one as well? http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/11/128
I think
the patch is good to merge after the cosmetic change. I can do it in
next pull request
Make sure that at least cmpxchg64_local is available on all architectures to use
for unsigned long long values.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
---
include/asm-powerpc/system.h | 18 --
1
This patch contains the scheduled removal of legacy I2C RTC drivers with
replacement drivers.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |7
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc832x_mds.c | 24 -
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_mds.c |
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 01:55:30AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:40 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
Jon Loeliger wrote:
So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
Jon,
It seems like have libfdt as a unique
Currently all the read/write functions in libfdt require that the
given tree be v17, and further, that the tree has the memory
reservation block, structure block and strings block stored in that
physical order.
This patch eases these constraints, by making fdt_open_int() reorder
the blocks,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:55:03 -0700
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:11 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Well, We don't need arch-specific remove_memory() for ia64 and ppc64.
x86_64, I don't know. We will know, only when some one does the
verification. I don't
-Original Message-
From: Anton Vorontsov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 5:59 AM
To: Li Yang-r58472
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: add support for netpoll
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 13:45 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi all,
We've got some kernel code that monitors which pages have been dirtied
by an application.
The pages are locked in memory, and the system has no swap. Initially
we mark the pages clean using ptep_clear_flush_dirty(), then
This patch moves the dtc code for checking the device tree its
processing into a new checks.c. The tree accessor functions from
livetree.c which the checks use are exported and added to dtc.h.
Another small step towards a flexible checking architecture.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson [EMAIL
38 matches
Mail list logo
