On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 03:34:16PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
+} elsif ($arch eq sh) {
+$section_regex = Disassembly of section\\s+(\\S+):;
+$function_regex = ^([0-9a-fA-F]+)\\s+(.*?):;
+$mcount_regex = ^\\s*([0-9a-fA-F]+):.*\\smcount\$;
+$type = .long;
+
+# force
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 10:52 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys call handling in an crude
way and then it works. Apperently the kernel thinks is an error if the
syscall returns a value between -_LAST_ERRNO and -1.
Try this patch
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:52:14AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys call handling in an crude
way and then it works. Apperently the kernel thinks is an error if the
syscall returns a value between -_LAST_ERRNO and -1.
Try
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 09:41 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:52:14AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys call handling in an crude
way and then it works. Apperently the kernel thinks is an error if the
Gabriel Paubert writes:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:52:14AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys call handling in an crude
way and then it works. Apperently the kernel thinks is an error if the
syscall returns a value between
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:59 +0100, Ricardo wrote:
Hello All:
I am using the paulus tree popwerpc linux kernel for a ppc440 cpu
located in a Virtex5 FPGA.
While developing some drivers (a simple gpio device) I have notice
that if I try to access an unmapped area (an address without any
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 20:03 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Gabriel Paubert writes:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:52:14AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys call handling in an crude
way and then it works. Apperently the
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 10:52 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys call handling in an crude
way and then it works. Apperently the kernel thinks is an error if the
syscall returns a value between -_LAST_ERRNO and -1.
Try this patch
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 08:03:06PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Gabriel Paubert writes:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:52:14AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys call handling in an crude
way and then it works. Apperently
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
+ force_successful_syscall_return();
return (long) jiffies_64_to_clock_t(get_jiffies_64());
Why is 64 bits ops used here when you only use 32 bits?
If HZ is 1000, jiffies_64_to_clock_t is going to divide jiffies by 10,
so we need to start with 64 bits in
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 10:31 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 10:52 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys call handling in an crude
way and then it works. Apperently the kernel thinks is an error if the
Gabriel Paubert writes:
Who does this? I have spotted some errors in other places on
my man pages too, especially in the networking area (they were
correct once upon a time, but have not been updated).
Michael Kerrisk [EMAIL PROTECTED], I believe.
Paul.
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 20:51 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
+ force_successful_syscall_return();
return (long) jiffies_64_to_clock_t(get_jiffies_64());
Why is 64 bits ops used here when you only use 32 bits?
If HZ is 1000, jiffies_64_to_clock_t is going to
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 10:50 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 08:03:06PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Gabriel Paubert writes:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:52:14AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
This little hack changes the kernel sys
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:44:29PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 03:34:16PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
+} elsif ($arch eq sh) {
+$section_regex = Disassembly of section\\s+(\\S+):;
+$function_regex = ^([0-9a-fA-F]+)\\s+(.*?):;
+$mcount_regex =
Hi all,
we have trouble with the eth based config pins (ETH0...ETH6) of the MPC5200B
CPU. These pins act as the interface to an external phy and also act as
configurations pins to configure the size of the flash and other things.
While the reset is active these pins should be in their high
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:11:49PM -0800, Jim Radford wrote:
Ingo and Steven,
Here's an updated version of the arch/arm changes for dynamic ftrace
based on top of your latest tip/master.
Excuse me if I'm rather confused, but...
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:11:49PM -0800, Jim Radford wrote:
Ingo and Steven,
Here's an updated version of the arch/arm changes for dynamic ftrace
based on top of your latest tip/master.
Excuse me if I'm rather confused, but...
When ftrace for ARM was originally merged, neither
Hi Stuart,nbsp;nbsp; Thanks for the information.nbsp;nbsp; gpp access was
resolved. nbsp;nbsp; I was successful in building the linux 2.6.11 using the
ltib and able to bring up the MPC8360 EMDS.But, I stillnbsp;face the problem
for linux kernel 2.6.19 and 2.6.20.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;When I tried
Hi Nanda,
You'll need to get help from the kernel experts with this issue.
Regards, Stuart
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:16 +, nanda wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Thanks for the information. gpp access was resolved.
I was successful in building the linux 2.6.11 using the ltib and
able to bring
On Friday 21 November 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Oh just that for powermac for example, I know I'm resetting the thing,
so can't rely on init values, and on some BML embedded boxes too, while
on things like cell I don't off hand know what the right CPU number is
to hit the right C3PO
From: Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
shca_list_lock is taken from softirq context in ehca_poll_eqs, so we need to
lock IRQ safe elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Joachim Fenkes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c | 17
On Nov 20, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Milton Miller wrote:
Stated differently, if your routine (1) fundamently works one
character
at a time and (2) is not interrupt driven, and (3) only supports one
channel, what avantage is there to an explicit hvc driver?
I think it's because
Hi Scott,
On Thursday 20 November 2008, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:32:23PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Instead of rounding the divider down, improve the baud-rate generators
accuracy by rounding to the nearest integer.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart [EMAIL
Milton Miller wrote:
We want the last console= parameter on the command line to win. So if
that implys the last call to add_preferred_console wins, then you have
code overriding the command line.
Hmm, good point. However, how likely is it that we'll have more than one
console driver?
shca_list_lock is taken from softirq context in ehca_poll_eqs, so we need to
lock IRQ safe elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Friday 21 November 2008 17:02, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 16:37 +0100,
Jürgen,
Have a look at the manual chapter 4 (=Reset + Config).
SRESET (issued by gpt0 - watchdog) isn't supposed to do a full hardware
reset.
Looks like you should make use of the SRESET and trigger HRESET accordingly.
I could solve this with _not_ using the internal watchdog but an
external
Hi Andre,
On Freitag, 21. November 2008, Andre Schwarz wrote:
Have a look at the manual chapter 4 (=Reset + Config).
SRESET (issued by gpt0 - watchdog) isn't supposed to do a full hardware
reset.
Looks like you should make use of the SRESET and trigger HRESET
accordingly.
I could solve
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thursday 20 November 2008, Scott Wood wrote:
This makes things worse on mpc8272ads -- the result of the division is
13.56, but I only get error-free serial output when rounding down. I
don't think the remote end has timing problems, as I don't see this with
any other
Dave,
On Friday 21 November 2008, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2008, Stefan Roese wrote:
+ dev_dbg(spi-dev, %s: mode %d, %u bpw, %d hz\n,
+ __FUNCTION__, spi-mode, spi-bits_per_word,
+ spi-max_speed_hz);
Oh, and checkpatch.pl would warn
Looks good... I'll add this for 2.6.29, since as far as I can tell this
bug has been there approximately forever already.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Nov 21, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Milton Miller wrote:
We want the last console= parameter on the command line to win. So if
that implys the last call to add_preferred_console wins, then you have
code overriding the command line.
Hmm, good point. However, how likely is it that
On Nov 20, 2008, at 6:35 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:07:11PM -0600, Milton Miller wrote:
David Gibson wrote at 2008-11-18 00:28:28:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:41:24PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:54 PM, David Gibson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 15:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Oh just that for powermac for example, I know I'm resetting the thing,
so can't rely on init values, and on some BML embedded boxes too, while
on things like cell I don't off
I was handed off a bug report about a blade not booting with a, um
newer kernel. After turning on some debugging messages, I got this
ominous message:
node 1
NODE_DATA() = c000
Which obviously comes from here:
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
Dave Hansen wrote:
I was handed off a bug report about a blade not booting with a, um
newer kernel.
If you're unable to provide basic information such as the kernel
version then perhaps this isn't the best forum for discussing this. :)
I'm thinking that we need to at least fix
36 matches
Mail list logo
