On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:38 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:22 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Now that they are almost identical, we can merge some of the definitions
> > related to the PTE format into common files.
>
>
>
> > +/* Protection used for kernel tex
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:22 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Now that they are almost identical, we can merge some of the definitions
> related to the PTE format into common files.
> +/* Protection used for kernel text. We want the debuggers to be able to
> + * set breakpoints anywhere, so
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Ok, so I tried here on a dual G5 and couldn't reproduce with -rc6
g64e7130.
Now, it would be nice if you guys stopped sending stripped down dmesg...
the whole thing is potentially relevant. Also, which compiler version
did you use to generate this kernel ?
Hi Be
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:22 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Now that they are almost identical, we can merge some of the definitions
> related to the PTE format into common files.
Hrm... some of the last 2 patches got mangled with each other ...
applying both works fine but don't try to bui
Now that they are almost identical, we can merge some of the definitions
related to the PTE format into common files.
This creates a new pte-common.h which is included by both 32 and 64-bit
right after the CPU specific pte-*.h file, and which defines some
bits to "default" values if they haven't b
This patch tweaks the way some PTE bit combinations are defined, in such a
way that the 32 and 64-bit variant become almost identical and that will
make it easier to bring in a new common pte-* file for the new variant
of the Book3-E support.
The combination of bits defining access to kernel pages
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Would it be easier to get Pengutronix to release a new u-boot for the
> pcm030? I'm using U-Boot 1.2.0-mpc5200b-tiny-2 (Apr 17 2007 -
> 11:49:20).
Only if it is a chip IO setup problem (like port_config or clock
setup). Otherwise the kernel shou
Would it be easier to get Pengutronix to release a new u-boot for the
pcm030? I'm using U-Boot 1.2.0-mpc5200b-tiny-2 (Apr 17 2007 -
11:49:20).
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailm
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> Just tried it on pcm030. If I uncomment the reg line the kernel won't
>>> boot at all. I don't get any output.
>>
>> I hooked up a serial
> And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially a
> 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ seccomp. It
> does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but it might not be
> used anywhere.
I have no idea who uses it. I just assume that anyone wh
[moving this conversation back to the mailing list. Don't forget to
use 'reply-all' on mailing list conversations.]
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Michael Guntsche wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2009, at 22:53, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Michael Guntsche
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> O
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> Just tried it on pcm030. If I uncomment the reg line the kernel won't
>> boot at all. I don't get any output.
>
> I hooked up a serial console instead of netcat.
>
> PCI: Probing PCI hardware
>
Hello,
I got brave enough this weekend to try flashing uBoot using uBoot. I used the
uBoot image that is in my ltib rootfs/boot directory. The build is 1.3.0 (Dec
22 2008 - 11:19:29) MPC83XX. It worked. On reboot the checksum on the uBoot
environment was bad so it used the default environme
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Just tried it on pcm030. If I uncomment the reg line the kernel won't
> boot at all. I don't get any output.
I hooked up a serial console instead of netcat.
## Booting image at 0050 ...
Image Name: Linux-2.6.29-rc6-efika
Created:
Just tried it on pcm030. If I uncomment the reg line the kernel won't
boot at all. I don't get any output.
p...@fd00 {
#interrupt-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <2>;
#address-cells = <3>;
device_type = "pci";
c
I'm writing a spi driver for MPC8377E.
I use a GPIO as the chip select signal.
I'm tring to use the NE or NF bits to decide when to read or when the transmit
is over.
But I found that I have just write the command,the NE is set.Also I found that
the transmit is not over the GPIO has been pull
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> Hi Grant,
>>>
>>> thanks for the review!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:31:24PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
Thanks for the
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> thanks for the review!
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:31:24PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Thanks for the patch Wolfram. Comments below.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 a
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> thanks for the review!
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:31:24PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch Wolfram. Comments below.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram San
Hi Grant,
thanks for the review!
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:31:24PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> Thanks for the patch Wolfram. Comments below.
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm032.dts |
20 matches
Mail list logo
