Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Unable to have UNCALIBRAT to SLAVE transition

2021-03-14 Thread Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
Il giorno dom 14 mar 2021 alle ore 16:58 Richard Cochran < richardcoch...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:30:31AM +0100, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: > > The failures are part of the test and after the HW restoring I'm pretty > > sure that the protocol waltzer is running fin

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Unable to have UNCALIBRAT to SLAVE transition

2021-03-14 Thread Richard Cochran
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:30:31AM +0100, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: > The failures are part of the test and after the HW restoring I'm pretty > sure that the protocol waltzer is running fine. I noticed that the ptp4l > shows master offset and delay summaries. In order to have offset and delay

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Unable to have UNCALIBRAT to SLAVE transition

2021-03-14 Thread Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
HI Richard, thanks for your answer. The failures are part of the test and after the HW restoring I'm pretty sure that the protocol waltzer is running fine. I noticed that the ptp4l shows master offset and delay summaries. In order to have offset and delay values, the Sync/DelayReq/DelayResp should