On 04/05/2021 10:16, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:43:51PM +0900, 박웅섭 wrote:
>> 1.In the text->length=c->desc.userDescription.length part of clock.c line
>> 368, the length declared in the static_ptp_text structure is of type signed
>> int and the length declared in the
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:43:51PM +0900, 박웅섭 wrote:
> 1.In the text->length=c->desc.userDescription.length part of clock.c line
> 368, the length declared in the static_ptp_text structure is of type signed
> int and the length declared in the text structure is unsigned int. Why did
> you write
Hi,
I did a static analysis of linuxPTP. Among them, the violation alarm that
occurred for the clock.c source code was analyzed and corrected from the
viewpoint of security.
I have questions among them, so I send an email.
1.In the text->length=c->desc.userDescription.length part of clock.c
