On 11 July 2016 at 11:25, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2016 19:19:47 RDP wrote:
>> On 9 July 2016 at 12:49, Christian Schoenebeck
> Even though I am not convinced about phpbb's overall settings design, in this
> particular case there is no issue. It beha
On 9 July 2016 at 12:49, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> On Thursday, July 07, 2016 18:56:40 RDP wrote:
>> You mentioned previously, bumping licensing to a separate forum
>> section, and making it 'sticky'. Possily still worth doing, so as the
>> matter doesn'
On 6 July 2016 at 17:28, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> On Sunday, July 03, 2016 20:12:12 RDP wrote:
>> On 2 July 2016 at 12:47, Christian Schoenebeck
>>
>> wrote:
> I was not even aware that posts of newly registered users were forced for
> moderation. Quite a bunc
On 2 July 2016 at 12:47, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> Well, you can simply start a topic on bb.linuxsampler.org and update your
> (i.e. upper most) post with the latest version of the text. Of course I can
> also make a separate forum section and make the specific thread with the
> license text
)
Regards,
Chris.
On 28 June 2016 at 17:36, José Fernando Moyano wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Yes, i have to create the Wikipedia entry. I will try to do it today ...
> yep! ;-)
>
> Best Regards!
>
>
> El 28/06/16 a las 17:51, RDP escribió:
>> On 28 June 2016 at 1
On 29 June 2016 at 20:09, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> Might it not be a good idea for this discussion to be taken here,
>>
>>http://bb.linuxsampler.org/
>>
>> .. with some drafts published ( wiki style ), so that such a beast
>> can be formalised?
>>
>
> wiki-style sounds good to me. As to where I
On 28 June 2016 at 17:29, Christian Schoenebeck >
> They just keep going why they think they should not be obliged to ask for any
> commercial permission at all. Even if that commercial agreement would just be
> a matter of couple cents or even some kind of non-monetary one.
Such as showcasing a
On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down, elaborate
>> and suggest
>> clear license terms by yourself which could become a candidate to resolve
>> those overall
>> issue
On 28 June 2016 at 16:31, José Fernando Moyano wrote:
> Zynthian is not a product. It's an open specification for building a
> small-sound-computer with a UI well suited for live performing and sound
> operation. Everybody can download ALL the schemes and specifications. We
> don't hide nothing.
>
On 28 June 2016 at 15:38, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
If "you" gain money by selling commercial products based on open source
components, would it be *THAT* problematic to only forward a small subset of
the profit you made to the people who created those open source components,
Good point. I
On 28 June 2016 at 13:02, José Fernando Moyano wrote:
> The discussion is about LinuxSampler License, that is not GPL.
This page..
http://linuxsampler.org/downloads.html
.. states linuxsampler as being licensed under GPL with 'commercial exception'
That commercial exception, being ( snippe
Hi,
Looks like a very interesting *hardware* project. ;o)
Instead of all these words, pleas, and apparent implied restrictions..
would someone kindly care to point out, *EXACT:LY* where the GPL
is being battered/bent/broken? ;o)
Thanks.
Cheers!
Chris.
On 28 June 2016 at 12:12, José Ferna
The idea ( amongst other things ) was a for an Open Source sample library
collection.
At present it is a blank canvas, open to suggestion, if anyone cares to
respond.
Cheers,
Chris P.
--
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Worksho
13 matches
Mail list logo
