It might be best for you to find the many many times this has come up in
the archives and read away.
I think at this point the devs are working away and rarely get into the
topic anymore.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] linuxsampler source upgrade to GPLv3
I don't see the point of using the GPL if you don't want other peoples to
do what they want with your code.
Linuxsampler is (a very good) open source software, but in no way is it a
free software. All of the rights provided by the gpl are annihilated by the
commercial exception, so why choose the
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:22:14PM +0100, Simon Jenkins wrote:
> IANAL etc etc but surely you can't combine GPL'd code (whatever version)
> with Linuxsampler licenced code and then distribute it? If the combined
> work were allowed to be used commercially this would violate the
> Linuxsampler li
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Luke Smith wrote:
> After reading the GPL, I came to the conclusion that the non commercial
> 'addon' isn't compatible. Now I'm no lawyer but if thats correct,
> LinuxSampler is violating the GPL. Thus, any use of LinuxSampler would
> be illegal.
The authors of Lin
Hi,
We've been through this 'license incompatible' discussion before. The
original owners of the code are able to modify portions of the GPL
without 'breaking' it. Subsequent users/programmers are not.
GrahamG
On 8/24/09, Luke Smith wrote:
> After reading the GPL, I came to the conclusion that th
After reading the GPL, I came to the conclusion that the non commercial 'addon'
isn't compatible. Now I'm no lawyer but if thats correct, LinuxSampler is
violating the GPL. Thus, any use of LinuxSampler would be illegal.
- Original Message -
> I think it will never be something serious
On 24 Aug 2009, at 12:09, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:
>
> I'm doing something like a synthesizer that works in the frequency
> domain; it does FFT analysis of samples, then do all operations in
> frequency domain before rendering again to time domain. It is just an
> experiment at this moment, for fu
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] linuxsampler source upgrade to GPLv3
From: Roberto Gordo Saez
To: linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 08/24/09 05:09
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:44:12AM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:44:12AM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Hi!
Hey! thanks for response so fast.
> As you might know, LinuxSampler is released under GPL2 with commercial
> exception. So no matter if GPL2 or GPL3, the commercial exception still
> applies to LinuxSampler and derivat
Hi!
As you might know, LinuxSampler is released under GPL2 with commercial
exception. So no matter if GPL2 or GPL3, the commercial exception still
applies to LinuxSampler and derivative works. And btw, the GPL "header" is
not in all source files.
What kind of software do you want to write?
CU
Hello, I want to use the linuxsampler engine source code in a GPLv3
software. I've downloaded linuxsampler-1.0.0.tar.bz2. The usual upgrade
permission "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any
later version" seems to be in place for all .cpp files that I've seen,
though I have not l
11 matches
Mail list logo
