How are you launching fantasia? If you are doing it from the terminal
with command like "java -jar Fantasia.jar", try "java -version" to see
what version you are using. You may need to use full path, for example
"/opt/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -jar Fantasia.jar".
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Andrew C
I'm launching Fantasia from a terminal using:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.21/bin/java -jar Fantasia-0.9.jar
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-run-1.6.0.21/bin/java -version reports
java version "1.6.0_21"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_21-b06)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 17.0-b16, mixed
Is there some error logged in ~/.jsampler/jsampler.log?
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Andrew C wrote:
> I'm launching Fantasia from a terminal using:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.21/bin/java -jar Fantasia-0.9.jar
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-run-1.6.0.21/bin/java -version reports
>
> java versi
Note that jsampler.log contains messages only from the last session,
so your last session should be using the fantasia front-end.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Grigor Iliev wrote:
> Is there some error logged in ~/.jsampler/jsampler.log?
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Andrew C wrote:
>>
Hm, all that jsampler.log shows is
06-Oct-2010 16:24:16 org.jsampler.CC initJSampler
FINE: JSampler started
So this is probably a problem with java, rather than the Fantasia code itself?
Andrew.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Grigor Iliev wrote:
> Note that jsampler.log contains messages only
Is the fantasia version from the LS website running ok?
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Andrew C wrote:
> Hm, all that jsampler.log shows is
> 06-Oct-2010 16:24:16 org.jsampler.CC initJSampler
> FINE: JSampler started
>
> So this is probably a problem with java, rather than the Fantasia code itse
Hm, the same thing happens. This is a bit annoying.
I have no idea at all what has changed in my installation here though.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Grigor Iliev wrote:
> Is the fantasia version from the LS website running ok?
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Andrew C wrote:
>> Hm, all
