Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

2018-04-09 Thread Luigi Iannone 
Alberto, Fabio, Dino,

thanks for the clarifications.

Ciao

L.

> On 6 Apr 2018, at 20:20, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal  
> wrote:
> 
> That's a fair question Luigi. However, my personal opinion is that we should 
> not put this into the PubSub document since PubSub is deprecating this. 
> 
> I believe the redirection should be from MS-SMR to PubSub. Once you are 
> looking at PubSub there's no reason to look back at MS-SMR.
> 
> Alberto
> 
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Luigi Iannone  > wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering….. why not putting this as an appendix in the pubsub 
> document? Stating that was the previous solution for what pubs does and that 
> is kept in appendix as informational material.
> 
> any thoughts?
> 
> L.
> 
> 
>> On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:17, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal > > wrote:
>> 
>> Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to 
>> end and will update this document as appropriate.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alberto
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci > > wrote:
>> Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a 
>> working group document, maybe this document should point to 
>> draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>> > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal 
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft 
>> > [1]. The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send 
>> > SMRs and includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as 
>> > the preferred PubSub mechanism.
>> >
>> > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would like 
>> > to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG item).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Alberto
>> >
>> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06 
>> > 
>> >
>> > ___
>> > lisp mailing list
>> > lisp@ietf.org 
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp 
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp 
>> 
> 
> 

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

2018-04-06 Thread Alberto Rodriguez-Natal 
That's a fair question Luigi. However, my personal opinion is that we
should not put this into the PubSub document since PubSub is deprecating
this.

I believe the redirection should be from MS-SMR to PubSub. Once you are
looking at PubSub there's no reason to look back at MS-SMR.

Alberto

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was wondering….. why not putting this as an appendix in the pubsub
> document? Stating that was the previous solution for what pubs does and
> that is kept in appendix as informational material.
>
> any thoughts?
>
> L.
>
>
> On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:17, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal 
> wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to
> end and will update this document as appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> Alberto
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci 
> wrote:
>
>> Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a
>> working group document, maybe this document should point to
>> draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?
>>
>> Dino
>>
>> > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <
>> rodriguezna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft
>> [1]. The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send
>> SMRs and includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as
>> the preferred PubSub mechanism.
>> >
>> > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would
>> like to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG
>> item).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Alberto
>> >
>> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06
>> >
>> > ___
>> > lisp mailing list
>> > lisp@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>
>>
> ___
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>
>
>
___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

2018-04-06 Thread Fabio Maino 

I agree with Dino.

Fabio

On 4/6/18 8:07 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:

Well it wasn’t a previous WG solution. It was an individual submission that one 
vendor implemented. Since the WG supports pubsub going forward, I think a 
forward pointer from the individual submission to the WG document is sufficient.

Dino


On Apr 6, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:

Hi,

I was wondering….. why not putting this as an appendix in the pubsub document? 
Stating that was the previous solution for what pubs does and that is kept in 
appendix as informational material.

any thoughts?

L.



On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:17, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal  
wrote:

Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to end 
and will update this document as appropriate.

Thanks,
Alberto

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci  wrote:
Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a 
working group document, maybe this document should point to 
draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?

Dino


On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal  
wrote:

Hi all,

We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft [1]. The 
revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send SMRs and 
includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as the preferred 
PubSub mechanism.

Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would like to 
move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG item).

Thanks,
Alberto

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp


___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp



___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

2018-04-06 Thread Dino Farinacci 
Well it wasn’t a previous WG solution. It was an individual submission that one 
vendor implemented. Since the WG supports pubsub going forward, I think a 
forward pointer from the individual submission to the WG document is sufficient.

Dino

> On Apr 6, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering….. why not putting this as an appendix in the pubsub 
> document? Stating that was the previous solution for what pubs does and that 
> is kept in appendix as informational material.
> 
> any thoughts?
> 
> L.
> 
> 
>> On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:17, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to 
>> end and will update this document as appropriate.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alberto
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci  wrote:
>> Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a 
>> working group document, maybe this document should point to 
>> draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>> > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal 
>> >  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft 
>> > [1]. The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send 
>> > SMRs and includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as 
>> > the preferred PubSub mechanism.
>> >
>> > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would like 
>> > to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG item).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Alberto
>> >
>> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06
>> >
>> > ___
>> > lisp mailing list
>> > lisp@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

2018-04-06 Thread Luigi Iannone 
Hi,

I was wondering….. why not putting this as an appendix in the pubsub document? 
Stating that was the previous solution for what pubs does and that is kept in 
appendix as informational material.

any thoughts?

L.


> On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:17, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal  
> wrote:
> 
> Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to end 
> and will update this document as appropriate.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alberto
> 
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci  > wrote:
> Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a 
> working group document, maybe this document should point to 
> draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?
> 
> Dino
> 
> > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal 
> > > wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft [1]. 
> > The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send SMRs and 
> > includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as the 
> > preferred PubSub mechanism.
> >
> > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would like 
> > to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG item).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alberto
> >
> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06 
> > 
> >
> > ___
> > lisp mailing list
> > lisp@ietf.org 
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp 
> > 
> 
> 
> ___
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

2018-04-05 Thread Alberto Rodriguez-Natal 
Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to
end and will update this document as appropriate.

Thanks,
Alberto

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci  wrote:

> Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a
> working group document, maybe this document should point to
> draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?
>
> Dino
>
> > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <
> rodriguezna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft
> [1]. The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send
> SMRs and includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as
> the preferred PubSub mechanism.
> >
> > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would
> like to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG
> item).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alberto
> >
> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06
> >
> > ___
> > lisp mailing list
> > lisp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>
>
___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

2018-04-05 Thread Dino Farinacci 
Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a 
working group document, maybe this document should point to 
draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?

Dino

> On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft [1]. 
> The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send SMRs and 
> includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as the preferred 
> PubSub mechanism.
> 
> Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would like to 
> move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG item).
> 
> Thanks,
> Alberto
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06
> 
> ___
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp