Jay and all,
I am sure that the ICANN is more than happy to see this kind of
reporting, even though we that have been actively participating
in these issues for some time know that this information is
inaccurate.
I am also very familiar with Mr. Pressmen's writing or reporting
style, which
William and all,
For you William and DSO.NET it likely means that you may need to
change your business plans slightly, like establishing a corp. credit
rating and corp. credit account. This will also be true of any other
small business owners such as regional ISP's.
So william, get that
Jay,
You really don't get it, do you? The Reuters story is about ICANN dropping
the $1 fee and opening up its board meetings. I don't think the journalist
set out to examine the history or future of the namespace.
When people start shouting about media bias you wonder how long it is before
they
Ivan,
You wrote:
Jay,
You really don't get it, do you? The Reuters story is about
ICANN dropping
the $1 fee and opening up its board meetings. I don't think
the journalist
set out to examine the history or future of the namespace.
When people start shouting about media bias you
I thought I must have missed something :-)
Ivan,
You wrote:
Jay,
You really don't get it, do you? The Reuters story is about
ICANN dropping
the $1 fee and opening up its board meetings. I don't think
the journalist
set out to examine the history or future of the namespace.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/daily/july99/internet22.htm
The roots of the current conflict extend back
to 1992, when the Internet was the territory of
academics and computer enthusiasts. Needing
an organization to manage
Just a quick reminder:
The Berkman Center will be webcasting this morning's hearings of the
House Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
on Domain Name System Privatization.
To tune in, go to http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/events shortly
before the 11:00 AM Eastern
Don Heath again is talking out of both
sides of his mouth, as the Link reference and this post will show
when put up against the minuets of the Berlin meeting regarding
Don's comments of the very formation of the NCDNHC.
Resolution 99.39 -- "with the recognition that the interests
absolutely Jay. how do you think the slime from alex ogilvie
earn their hoped for future fees from ICANN except by saying to
esther appear to drop your fee and open a board meeting and you will
get news stories where you look truly reformed because well will
write release telling lazy
I think Jay's concern - and mine also, is this. There
are currently 248 companies selling domains under
top level domanis they manage that are currently in
the legacy root servers.
Then, on the other hand, we have maybe a few dozen
companies that also want to manage a top level domain
domain
Why is the congressinal committee so hung up on NSI saynig
"consensus" and implying it means NSI consensus, yet
whenever Mike Roberts or Esther say "it was consensus of the
Inetrnet community" this is not questioned?
--
Richard Sexton | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dns.vrx.net/tech/rootzone
Mine too.
At 12:39 PM 7/22/99 -0400, you wrote:
I think Jay's concern - and mine also, is this. There
are currently 248 companies selling domains under
top level domanis they manage that are currently in
the legacy root servers.
Then, on the other hand, we have maybe a few dozen
companies
My nomination for the best soundbyte of today's Congressional Hearing on
"Domain Name System Privatization: Is ICANN Out of Control?"
"Consensus is a lot like pornography. You know it when you see it."
(Sorry, I don't have attribution).
Is there consensus on
How about this one by Jim Rutt... "What's good for the Internet is good
for NSI."
I don't think you'll get consensus on that one.
He also said (as I heard it) in response to a question about whether he
thinks NSI owns .com,
"That's a metaphysical question."
Craig Simon
On 22 July 1999, Ellen Rony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My nomination for the best soundbyte of today's Congressional Hearing on
"Domain Name System Privatization: Is ICANN Out of Control?"
"Consensus is a lot like pornography. You know it when you see it."
absolutely Jay. how do you think the slime from alex ogilvie
earn their hoped for future fees from ICANN except by saying to
esther appear to drop your fee and open a board meeting and you will
get news stories where you look truly reformed
Tangentially related: David Ogilvy, founder of
At 02:56 PM 7/22/99 -0400, you wrote:
From a practical perspective, NSI
was correct in doing this. What
better way to reduce the unnecessary
work flow (delinquencies, mailings,
etc.) than by stopping the problems
before they started.
Congratulations to NSI.
Yeah, right. "Congratulations,
At 11:33 AM 7/22/99 -0800, you wrote:
My nomination for the best soundbyte of today's Congressional Hearing on
"Domain Name System Privatization: Is ICANN Out of Control?"
"Consensus is a lot like pornography. You know it when you see it."
(Sorry, I don't have
As of several hours ago, the audio archive of this morning's hearing of the
House Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations is
available online at the Berkman Center's ICANN-Related Events page,
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/events.
I've also just uploaded some notes I
The Reuters story is about ICANN = dropping the $1 fee and opening
up its board meetings.
Ironically, this statement in itself illustrates how easy it is to trim
off details in order to get something into print, even if one is not
overtly grinding an axe (or working for a penny a word).
Michael and all,
Very nice essay Michael. I liked it allot. However it really doesn't
tell us anything that most of us don't already know. Nor does it
provide
any real insight that might solve some of the problems with making the
transition to private competitive based internet.
Your
Rod and all,
Well DOC/NTIA did make this mistake, but haven't got the
guts to
admit it. But it is well documented. I also agree that
this will be
a very big deal and battle. However given the choice between
having the registry database in the hands of NSI vs ICANN I would
at this juncture opt
Given today's events, Jim Rutt better announce the formation of a
Global Open Registry Association and solicit the 224 country code
TLDs to join the Registry Association before the GAC makes them
obsolete. The Registry Association better also form its own
independent Root and invite the 224
Gordon, Brock, and all,
Thank you Gordon for sharing this with us. It seems to me though
that this should have been released some time ago if possible.
Don't you think? Others?
Brock, How long have you had a copy of this E-Mail form Mr. Sims?
There is much in this letter that explains
24 matches
Mail list logo
