Ian Bowers wrote:
are both pfSense A and pfSense B on the same subnet? such that pfSense A
is the default gateway for clients, but pfSense B is how they have to get
to the printer?
Yes to all of that.
if this is the case, and both firewalls are on the same
subnet, you're going to have
Michael D. Wood wrote:
What do the firewall logs show? Any noticeable blocked traffic between
A B? Turn on logging in the Firewall rules to check it out.
Nothing in either of their firewall logs.
--
Pete Boyd
Open Plan IT - http://openplanit.co.uk
The Golden Ear - http://thegoldenear.org
On 23/10/2013 17:03, petes-li...@thegoldenear.org wrote:
general description of a subnet with end-user systems and multiple
routers on that subnet
In general, I believe the sound design of a network has the following
rules-of-thumb:
1. There should only be one router (or virtual router in
That's very helpful thank you.
--
Pete Boyd
Open Plan IT - http://openplanit.co.uk
The Golden Ear - http://thegoldenear.org
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
It might also be useful to point Wireshark at the problem. With two
pfSense and with only one. The packet capture tool on pfSense can be used.
If the packets are delayed, that can be measured. If the packets are
going back and forth, or crossing from one pfSense to the other
(confusion), then
On 24/10/13 5:30 pm, Thinker Rix wrote:
I want to have:
- full Gigabit wire speed between the DMZ and the LAN zone (i.e. 2x
Gigabit at max)
Would have thought you'd be fine here.
- full 450Mbps between the WLAN and pfsense
Even with 450Mbps *radios* I'd be amazed if you get more than
On Oct 24, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc wrote:
On 24/10/13 5:30 pm, Thinker Rix wrote:
I want to have:
- full Gigabit wire speed between the DMZ and the LAN zone (i.e. 2x
Gigabit at max)
Would have thought you'd be fine here.
- full 450Mbps between the
On 13-10-24 12:49 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
If those wireless links are for exterior paths, and not simply 802.11
LANs, then you’re in for a huge amount of trouble, as wireless isn’t
reliable. At all.
I have to disagree, at least partially. In the wireless world,
reliability costs!
Hello-
I want to export a client configuration for use on a client's OpenVPN setup.
When I attempt to open the Client Export tab on a pfsense 2.0.3 box, I receive
a 404 error warning. The exact URL is http://serverhttp://%3cserver IP
address/vpn_openvpn_export.php
Is there a workaround I
On 10/24/2013 2:32 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
I want to export a client configuration for use on a client’s OpenVPN
setup. When I attempt to open the Client Export tab on a pfsense 2.0.3
box, I receive a 404 error warning. The exact URL is http://server
http://%3cserver IP
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.ccwrote:
On 24/10/13 5:30 pm, Thinker Rix wrote:
1. Would the Core2Duo CPU be sufficient for my requirements or should I
chose the 2,4 GHz Quad-core, the 2,89 GHz-Quad-core or maybe an even a
more powerful CPU or totally
Seth Mos seth.mos@... writes:
Alternatively you can try this:
Go to the command prompt page
include(shaper.inc)
include(upgrade_config.inc)
include(rrd.inc)
upgrade_080_to_081();
Make sure to backup beforehand.
Kind regards,
Seth
This is what worked for me
Diagnostics | Command
From what you've given me I've managed to fix the printing issue by making
this alteration on Windows workstations:
Windows Firewall - Advanced - ICMP - Settings - [*] Allow redirect
I'm going to investigate the performance issues you spoke of (there are 15
workstations on the network), and
Is there a workaround I could attempt in order to export a client
package?
Reinstall the OpenVPN Client Export package.
Reinstalling the client package seems to have worked. Is there a reason why
this particular package disappeared? Was this due to the upgrade from 2.0 to
2.0.3 sometime
Hi Chris,
thank you for your time!
On 2013-10-24 20:02, Chris Bagnall wrote:
- full 450Mbps between the WLAN and pfsense
Even with 450Mbps *radios* I'd be amazed if you get more than ~80Mbps
out of your WLAN. Not a pfSense limitation, just a reality of WLAN
claimed radio speeds. I generally
On 25/10/13 12:02 am, Thinker Rix wrote:
Ok, I see. Does this change with a router that has a Gigabit-NIC to
connect with pfSense, or isn't that the bottle neck?
I've never encountered even a 100Mbps NIC being a wireless bottleneck at
2.4Ghz. The limitation is effective throughput through the
On 24/10/13 7:31 pm, Adam Thompson wrote:
If I upgraded to a better-quality unit, or switched to licensed
spectrum, I could probably eliminate the variability and increase speed
simultaneously.
Indeed, we have Ubiquiti kit running point to point links in the 5Ghz
unlicensed spectrum (band C)
On Oct 24, 2013, at 1:16 PM, Pete Boyd petes-li...@thegoldenear.org wrote:
From what you've given me I've managed to fix the printing issue by making
this alteration on Windows workstations:
Windows Firewall - Advanced - ICMP - Settings - [*] Allow redirect
I'm going to investigate the
The topic has wandered away from pfSense.
-- Jim
On Oct 24, 2013, at 18:48, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc wrote:
On 24/10/13 7:31 pm, Adam Thompson wrote:
If I upgraded to a better-quality unit, or switched to licensed
spectrum, I could probably eliminate the variability and
What else is new with thinker as op.
25. okt. 2013 02:18 skrev Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com følgende:
The topic has wandered away from pfSense.
-- Jim
On Oct 24, 2013, at 18:48, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc
wrote:
On 24/10/13 7:31 pm, Adam Thompson wrote:
If I upgraded to
20 matches
Mail list logo