ile system clients. They were testing
boxes, not too powerful for the high end of compute/networking (40Gb
Infiniband), but able to drive load. Lower spec boxes can't generally
hack high data rates for any number of reasons.
--
Joe Landman
t: @hpcjoe
g: https://github.com/joelandman
On 08/09/2016 09:53 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a site that has grown significantly over time and the role pfsense plays
went from only providing internet and vpn connectivity to routing between 2
dozen vlans at gig speeds. We are considering replacing the hardware and aren't
sure if the
On 04/08/2015 03:09 PM, Jeppe Øland wrote:
Same here ... hard to believe Gmail is bouncing...
They've been black holing some of my email (to and from) on this and my
personal account. Not going to SPAM either. I also got the re-enable bit.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Mike Montgome
On 2/27/15 2:55 PM, Sean wrote:
You also need a real NULL modem cable. Actually there's probably
nothing wrong with your USB to Serial.
The blue Cisco cables are rollover cables. They are not NULL modem
cables. Welcome to serial cable pinout hell. ;-)
Some of us have been here a long time.
Hi folks:
We are working on running pfSense in a VM on a machine for a trade
show. The installation went fine, then I rebooted. The attached image
shows where it died. Any thoughts on this? Is this known not to work?
I am using two bridges on a linux host, one each for
internal/exter
On 02/15/2014 01:33 PM, Brian Caouette wrote:
CACHING
dnsmasq caches quite nicely.
On 2/15/2014 1:29 PM, Chris Bagnall wrote:
On 15/2/14 6:22 pm, Brian Caouette wrote:
I've been trying to use unbound with poor results. Currently it resolves
very very slowly. About 4 times longer then the d
On 01/07/2014 03:02 PM, Matthias May wrote:
Am 07.01.2014 20:52, schrieb Joe Landman:
Hi folks:
I am trying to match a spec we've been given as precisely as
possible. I can't rename the gateways from the web interface. Is it
possible to rename them from hand editing the confi
On 01/07/2014 03:09 PM, Walter Parker wrote:
Once you create a gateway, you can not rename it from the GUI. I had
to delete and re-create my gateway in order to rename it.
Got it. Thanks!
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics, Inc.
email: land...@scalableinformatics.co
Hi folks:
I am trying to match a spec we've been given as precisely as
possible. I can't rename the gateways from the web interface. Is it
possible to rename them from hand editing the config.xml file? or some
other method?
Thanks!
Joe
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable
On 12/12/2013 04:41 PM, Benjamin Swatek wrote:
On 11, Dec2013, at 15:14 , Joe Landman
<mailto:land...@scalableinformatics.com>> wrote:
[...]
So ... my question is, what diagnostics should I try to be able to
identify the issue (some sites not working when the system is set
On 12/11/2013 02:38 PM, Justin Edmands wrote:
Monitor blocked attempts under Status --> System Logs --> Firewall ...
filter for the IP you want. If you see the block, click the small grey
arrow with a plus sign next to the destination IP. This will create a
rule and allow you to go to Firewa
Hi folks:
Trying to figure this one out. Very simple concept, I want to take
one virtual IP (VIP), and tie it to an internal (isolated) machine for
customer/partner use. I've done this before using other firewall
appliances, and it works pretty well for its use case. I just tried to
do
Hi folks
I've run into an issue that has me somewhat confused. Our multiwan
router is up and "working". This is 2.1 release. I've got 2 ports to
two different network providers (different technologies at that).
Following the directions (
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-WAN_2.0),
Hi folks
We are replacing a black box multi-wan FW appliance with 2.1 running
on one of our boxen. Our config is multi-wan (ipv4 only), and we want
to do load balancing (asymmetric, by the bandwidth ratio). We'll have
standard desktop and server machines running behind it, as well as SIP
I just worked out setting up new filters for the recent S/N destroying,
high tin-foil-hat content, on gmail. Since people pleading for this to
go away hasn't worked, technological measures to restore S/N for my
inbox on this list have been engaged.
Please folks, take the tin foil hat discussi
Hi folks ... any guidance on the 2.1 timeline? Is it considered stable
for end user use yet? I'd prefer to deploy things actually marked as
stable (we have 2.0.1 in use at customer sites, and are playing with it
internally). I'd like to get 2.1 up for better driver support (and ease
of buil
On 06/04/2012 09:38 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
Chris
That is good to know.
I have some wireless backhauls pushing well over 100mbps
So better to know now vs later
any suggestions on hardware for the sky in that case?
We've built some boxen for customers for pfSense with up to 8x 1GbE
ports, and
Here's what we are trying to do . I've got pfSense up and I've got 5
WAN IP addresses in the WAN subnet.
a.b.c.d
a.b.c.d+1
a.b.c.d+2
a.b.c.d+3
a.c.d.d+4
I would like to NAT by specific address, and add VPN functionality to
only specific IPs. So d is
Hi folks
I need to compile a driver for pfSense (specifically the Solarflare
10GbE driver, but possibly others). I tried with a VM of FreeBSD 8.1 on
a different machine, but I couldn't see the driver after pkg_add ...
and a kldload sfxge . Is there a way to pull a full build environment,
On 04/15/2012 03:57 PM, Ernst den Broeder wrote:
The host sees the packet as coming from !192.168.0.0/16 and will
route to its default gateway. If your just playing around, you could
add a route for 10.100.0.0/16 on your host to 192.168.3.1.
I did try this, but I don't think it worked.
The
Hi folks:
Have pfSense 2.0.1 stable installed on a machine we are using for
testing. 2x em network ports. Have em0 configured as WAN with IP
10.100.241.121/16, and em1 configured as LAN with IP 192.168.3.1/16.
I can reach the LAN port with ssh/others easily. No issues. I turned
on ICMP r
21 matches
Mail list logo