Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Thinker Rix
On 2013-10-09 19:38, Jim Thompson wrote: So asking the question is stupid On 2013-10-09 19:50, Jim Thompson wrote: IMO, this bullshit thread only serves to assist those asking the question in stroking their own ego. On 2013-10-12 01:40, Jim Thompson wrote: Otherwise: get off my lawn. I'm

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-12 Thread Jens Kuehnel
Am 12.10.13 00:35, schrieb Walter Parker: Hi, So, if I have an ALIX that I would like to upgrade, how much would I have to increase /tmp and /var by to have the upgrade run to completion without filling the partitions? How many Interfaces do you have. With 5 it is no problem with 11 it is.

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Oliver Hansen
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Thinker Rix thinke...@rocketmail.comwrote: On 2013-10-09 19:38, Jim Thompson wrote: So asking the question is stupid On 2013-10-09 19:50, Jim Thompson wrote: IMO, this bullshit thread only serves to assist those asking the question in stroking their own

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Jim Thompson
On Oct 12, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Thinker Rix thinke...@rocketmail.com wrote: On 2013-10-11 22:33, Walter Parker wrote: Yes, you have been informed correctly. There are more than 2. According the World Atlas (http://www.worldatlas.com/nations.htm#.UlhOHVFDsnY) the number is someone between 189

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Adrian Wenzel
- Original Message - From: Oliver Hansen oliver.han...@gmail.com To: pfSense support and discussion list@lists.pfsense.org Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 11:23:56 AM Subject: Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Thinker Rix

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 01:41:40PM -0400, Adrian Wenzel wrote: I can't say I agree with Thinker Rix on everything but on this I do agree. I have been on this list for many years (mostly just reading) and have always been impressed with the professionalism of most members who write and

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Oliver Hansen
- Original Message - From: Adrian Wenzel adr...@lostland.net To: pfSense support and discussion list@lists.pfsense.org Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 10:41:40 AM Subject: Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws snip I can't say I agree with Thinker Rix on everything but on

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Chris L
On 2013-10-12 01:40, Jim Thompson wrote: I'm not willing to endure this uninformed Alex Jonesian crapfest. Nice position to take, except Alex Jones was right. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Bob Gustafson
+1 On 10/12/2013 12:41 PM, Adrian Wenzel wrote: I'm behind Jim on this. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

[pfSense] Upgrade Guide: Needs update for Auto Update

2013-10-12 Thread Thinker Rix
Hello all, I just performed an upgrade to 2.1 via the Auto update feature in the web UI, which worked flawlessly. When studying the Upgrade Guide (https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Upgrade_Guide) prior the upgrade I could not find any information about it. Is there a way I can update the

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade Guide: Needs update for Auto Update

2013-10-12 Thread Jim Thompson
On Oct 12, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Thinker Rix thinke...@rocketmail.com wrote: Hello all, I just performed an upgrade to 2.1 via the Auto update feature in the web UI, which worked flawlessly. When studying the Upgrade Guide (https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Upgrade_Guide) prior the

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Jim Thompson
On Oct 12, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote: On 2013-10-12 01:40, Jim Thompson wrote: I'm not willing to endure this uninformed Alex Jonesian crapfest. Nice position to take, except Alex Jones was right. Sigh. As much as this doesn’t belong on the pfsense list… I

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-12 Thread Jens Kühnel
Hi again, So, if I have an ALIX that I would like to upgrade, how much would I have to increase /tmp and /var by to have the upgrade run to completion without filling the partitions? How many Interfaces do you have. With 5 it is no problem with 11 it is. Can't tell you where the exact

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-12 Thread Paul Mather
On Oct 12, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Oliver Hansen oliver.han...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Thinker Rix thinke...@rocketmail.com wrote: On 2013-10-09 19:38, Jim Thompson wrote: So asking the question is stupid On 2013-10-09 19:50, Jim Thompson wrote: IMO, this bullshit