This is certainly possible, but the RRD GUI has a choice to display stats for
WAN (Default) and LAN... selectin LAN essentially swaps the In/Out columns +/-
a few gigs...
We are running ntopng but it only has data for the last 12 days... the one
webserver that is likely causing a lot of usage
I found Suricata won't start, and I'm guessing the error Suricata is
logging when it terminates (leaving its .pid file behind), "23/5/2018 --
22:42:18 - -- [ERRCODE: SC_ERR_INVALID_ARGUMENT(13)] - alert-pf: Could
not validate pf table: snort2c, module init failed." ...is related to
After upgrading our HA routers from 2.4.2_1 to 2.4.3_1, every few minutes they
are logging:
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:242: syntax error - The
line in question reads [242]: pass out route-to ( lagg0 64.79.96.145 ) from
to !/ tracker 105913 keep state
FWIW I upgraded our SG-4860 pair and saw the same behavior, fails after
the metadata update. I waited 5 minutes and it did not restart and saw no
indication in system log it was going to, or upgrading.
--
Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Yates
Sent:
Is it possible these numbers are for both interfaces on the pfSense box? If
so, do they include both inbound and outbound traffic for both? That would
effectively double the true data transfer if traffic isn't being routed
between other subnets / interfaces on the firewall. I don't have RRD
I don't have a straight answer for you, but are you sure the DC is counting all
traffic and not just HTTP/SMTP/etc? I would think they are, but...
Something that may help...the firewall/rules page tracks data usage in the
States column. I'm assuming from when it was last booted. Perhaps make
Sorry for the long subject but has anyone experienced in the ZFS install for a
mirrored setup of two disks that you need to set kern.geom.debugflags=16 to
allow shooting yourself in the foot just to get the kernel to stop denying you
access to the disks ?
The UFS install works as intended.
We've run into a data overage situation at a datacenter... We get charged a
premium per GB over 500GB (yes I know, stupid). Their reporting system seems to
indicate significantly less data usages vs pfSense's RRD reporting... their
billing system seems to be indicating overage similar to their
El mar, 22-05-2018 a las 20:54 -0400, John Johnstone escribió:
> On 5/18/2018 10:42 AM, Alberto José García Fumero wrote:
>
> > Im trying to block spam (for instance, from 185.234.217.232).
> > As far as I know, it's trying to pass as a message from my very
> > net:
> >
> > Transcript of session
