On Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:21:55 PM Adam Thompson
wrote:
> I'm thinking that if you need advanced features, go buy a
> Cisco/Juniper. But if you need basic (or even just
> homogenous) functionality, pfSense ought to be a
> good-enough platform. It's really close right now but
> not having r
Fantastic job all, keep up the great work! My team and I are extremely
appreciative as always.
James
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Buechler
Sent: September-15-13 2:50 AM
To: pfSense support and discuss
I'm thinking that if you need advanced features, go buy a Cisco/Juniper.
But if you need basic (or even just homogenous) functionality, pfSense ought to
be a good-enough platform.
It's really close right now but not having redistribution is a roadblock, at
least for me.
-Adam
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:12:48 PM Adam Thompson
wrote:
> What happened to all the work Google was doing on IS-IS
> in Quagga? -Adam
Still ongoing, but shipping code is not usable still.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
What happened to all the work Google was doing on IS-IS in Quagga?
-Adam
Mark Tinka wrote:
>On Sunday, September 15, 2013 07:35:27 PM Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> I agree. From what I have done with Quagga on OSPF, it's
>> been pretty straightforward and simple and tends to just
>> work and work well
On Sunday, September 15, 2013 07:35:27 PM Jim Pingle wrote:
> I agree. From what I have done with Quagga on OSPF, it's
> been pretty straightforward and simple and tends to just
> work and work well.
>
> It isn't without its quirks, but I've never been sure if
> those are actually quirks in Quagg
Here in California, auto update worked like a charm on my home Alix
embedded system. Went from 203 to 210 on 15 sept 2013 around noon.
Yudhvir
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Christian Borchert wrote:
> Thanks everyone for all the work!
> --Original Message--
> From: Chris Buechler
>
Thanks everyone for all the work!
--Original Message--
From: Chris Buechler
Sender: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
To: pfSense support and discussion
To: d...@lists.pfsense.org
ReplyTo: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] pfSense 2.1-RELEASE and Gold Subscription Now Available
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
>
> I assume this is why snapshots.pfsense.org is offline (or at least not
> answering) right now?
There aren't any snapshots to be had, so it's just pointing to a
"Check back later" page at the moment. For those who were tracking
snapshots
Am 15.09.2013 02:22, schrieb Chris Buechler:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Klaus Lichtenwalder
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in the last few weeks I experience the effect that my pfsense box
>> suddenly blocks most of the outgoing traffic via the bogon rule. At
>> least I interprete it that way:
>> S
On 9/15/2013 1:31 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> On 9/15/2013 1:17 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
>>> If we mix Quagga and BIRD, don't we wind up with fragmentation problems
>>> very similar to what we have now?
>>
>> No because as far as I can see BI
On Sep 15, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> On 9/15/2013 1:17 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
>> If we mix Quagga and BIRD, don't we wind up with fragmentation problems very
>> similar to what we have now?
>
> No because as far as I can see BIRD's binaries are bird, birdc, and
> birdcl. It does
On 9/15/2013 1:17 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> If we mix Quagga and BIRD, don't we wind up with fragmentation problems very
> similar to what we have now?
No because as far as I can see BIRD's binaries are bird, birdc, and
birdcl. It doesn't have a dedicated daemon process for each type of routing.
If we mix Quagga and BIRD, don't we wind up with fragmentation problems very
similar to what we have now?
Quagga's BGP must be at least functional since Vyatta uses it...
-Adam
Jim Pingle wrote:
>On 9/15/2013 12:50 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
>> Is BGPd in Quagga likely to be a huge PITA? If not,
On 9/15/2013 12:50 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> Is BGPd in Quagga likely to be a huge PITA? If not, I'll probably take a
> stab at integrating it into the GUI. If I can figure out how to build
> packages, anyway. (I'd prefer OpenOSPFd instead of Quagga, but that seems
> like a dead duck in pfSe
I like that idea. I basically need Vyatta without the corporate... issues that
goes along with it.
I'm currently using OpenBSD, which works well. However, I'm lazy and would
very much like to avoid having to maintain a network of OpenBSD boxen if
something with a nice, easy GUI exists.
-Adam
On Sep 15, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> Is BGPd in Quagga likely to be a huge PITA? If not, I'll probably take a
> stab at integrating it into the GUI. If I can figure out how to build
> packages, anyway. (I'd prefer OpenOSPFd instead of Quagga, but that seems
> like a dead
Is BGPd in Quagga likely to be a huge PITA? If not, I'll probably take a stab
at integrating it into the GUI. If I can figure out how to build packages,
anyway. (I'd prefer OpenOSPFd instead of Quagga, but that seems like a dead
duck in pfSense now.)
I do now need a more-capable router than w
On 9/15/2013 12:05 PM, compdoc wrote:
> Is it possible
> to restore a backup from 2.0.3 to a fresh install of 2.1? I have it running
> in a virtual machine, so there are 2 or 3 paths I can take.
Yes, you can restore a config from any older version on 2.1.
Jim
On 9/15/2013 11:58 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> Reading the release notes for 2.1 reminded me of something... shouldn't the
> use of PBI packaging now automagically resolve the conflicts between
> OpenBGPd/OpenOSPFd and Quagga?
Somewhat.
The actual calls to the binaries in their respective packag
> I assume this is why snapshots.pfsense.org is offline (or at least not
> answering) right now?
In the release announcement are links to upgrade binaries, not all the mirrors
are populated
yet, find one. In the same rel announcement is an upgrade guide link that
explains how to
perform the upg
> >I'm happy to announce both 2.1-RELEASE, and our new Gold Subscription,
> >including immediate PDF download to the updated 2.1 book for
>> subscribers!
>I assume this is why snapshots.pfsense.org is offline
At least the .iso for the LiveCD is downloading very quickly. Is it possible
to restor
Reading the release notes for 2.1 reminded me of something... shouldn't the use
of PBI packaging now automagically resolve the conflicts between
OpenBGPd/OpenOSPFd and Quagga?
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfs
> I'm happy to announce both 2.1-RELEASE, and our new Gold
> Subscription, including immediate PDF download to the updated 2.1
> book for subscribers!
I assume this is why snapshots.pfsense.org is offline (or at least not
answering) right now? Something must be broken either at my end or yours,
Hello all,
Just a small PSA to be patient during the initial reboot of your pfSense
2.1-RELEASE upgrade. In my case, I thought it had hung as the NTOP package
reinstall seemed stuck at 80%. I was just about to call out here for help,
when it woke up and finished gracefully.
Anyway - just be
I'm happy to announce both 2.1-RELEASE, and our new Gold Subscription,
including immediate PDF download to the updated 2.1 book for
subscribers!
Check out the announcements on our blog.
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=712 - 2.1-RELEASE
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=718 - Gold Subscription
Thanks for you
26 matches
Mail list logo
