Re: [pfSense] apu.4c silently dies

2014-05-19 Thread Mathieu Simon (Lists)
Hi mayak > Many roads lead to ... gut says SSD - I'd try running off CD first. Seems apu1.4c (guess that's what you meant) has a SATA port, now you only need to get find way for powering a desktop CD/DVD drive (i.e. spare ATX power supply) > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:15 PM, mayak wrote: > >> h

Re: [pfSense] apu.4c silently dies

2014-05-19 Thread Mehma Sarja
Many roads lead to ... gut says SSD - I'd try running off CD first. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:15 PM, mayak wrote: > hi all, > > i have a new apu.4c with a Kingston SSD > > unit will run sometimes for days, or sometimes for several hours, before > becoming unresponsive: > > - no mac response fr

[pfSense] apu.4c silently dies

2014-05-19 Thread mayak
hi all, i have a new apu.4c with a Kingston SSD unit will run sometimes for days, or sometimes for several hours, before becoming unresponsive: - no mac response from ethernet cards - serial console dies -- no errors displayed - no errors in system log - no crash report on reboot what is the be

Re: [pfSense] Block Android apps and https facebook or youtube

2014-05-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
You can’t really block apps from a platform without blocking the entire platform… As for Facebook and Youtube look into Squid filtering. On May 19, 2014, at 21:09, A Mohan Rao wrote: > How to block android apps or https facebook and https youtube for specific > pfsense users... > >

[pfSense] Block Android apps and https facebook or youtube

2014-05-19 Thread A Mohan Rao
How to block android apps or https facebook and https youtube for specific pfsense users... ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread Chris Bagnall
On 20 May 2014, at 01:41, Brian Caouette wrote: > So this machine should scream for a home based network from the looks of it. > My current test machine you'll all laugh www.dlois.com/status.html is here. > (I kepted my old domain from when I was a dialup provider) VERY old machine > with limit

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread Brian Caouette
So this machine should scream for a home based network from the looks of it. My current test machine you'll all laugh www.dlois.com/status.html is here. (I kepted my old domain from when I was a dialup provider) VERY old machine with limited hardware. It works well but doesn't always keep up wi

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread Walter Parker
Yea, I forgot about Itanium. For Itanium the initials are IA-64. There is a Tier-2 supported version of FreeBSD for that processor, but pfSense does not ship an IA-64 version. Walter On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > Itanium is the only one that’s different from AMD64. I

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
Itanium is the only one that’s different from AMD64. I’ve never touched an Itanium-driven machine. On May 19, 2014, at 18:06, Walter Parker wrote: > The amd64 is for all 64 bit machines (amd64 and Intel EMT64) > The x86 is for all 32 bit machines (Intel and AMD) > > According the spec sheet,

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread Walter Parker
The amd64 is for all 64 bit machines (amd64 and Intel EMT64) The x86 is for all 32 bit machines (Intel and AMD) According the spec sheet, http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/en/2850_specs.pdf, that is a 64 bit machine. Note, because AMD developed 64 for the x86 first, the BSDs cal

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread Brian Caouette
I think he told me it was a 64bit but wasn't sure of the Intel vs Amd. On 5/19/2014 6:38 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Check the model of the Xeon processor but I believe its 64bit. Once you check the model if it's a 64 use the AMD version otherwise if you can't find out go with the intel. -- Ryan

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread Ryan Coleman
Check the model of the Xeon processor but I believe its 64bit. Once you check the model if it's a 64 use the AMD version otherwise if you can't find out go with the intel. -- Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com m. 651.373.5015 o. 612.568.2749 > On May 19, 2014, at 17:37, Brian Caouette wrote: > >

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread James Caldwell
Amd64 is the 64 bit version that you would want to use on that proc. I386 is 32 bit. James -Original Message- From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Brian Caouette Sent: May-19-14 4:37 PM To: pfSense support and discussion Subject: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850 Just

[pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-19 Thread Brian Caouette
Just ordered a Poweredge 2850. It has the xeno processor. Do I install the Intell version or amd64? ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

[pfSense] Filtering on source == gateway addresses

2014-05-19 Thread Olivier Mascia
pfSense 2.1.3 Would it be possible to write rules filtering on one (or all) of the gateway addresses? For instance, using the gateway names as an ALIAS. Or creating an ALIAS whose value is resolved to this or that gateway or all gateway addresses. __ Olivier Mascia tipgroup.com/om ___

Re: [pfSense] IPSec VPN connected by no traffic passing through

2014-05-19 Thread Peter Collins
On 19 May 2014 18:10, Michael Schuh wrote: > setup a mtr, target to palo alto (may be in udp mode is a good idea) and > watch for routing issues and/or packet loss. > sounds in first instance like a flaky connection or routing changes. > > try to disable any DOS detection/prevention mechanisms in

Re: [pfSense] IPSec VPN connected by no traffic passing through

2014-05-19 Thread Michael Schuh
setup a mtr, target to palo alto (may be in udp mode is a good idea) and watch for routing issues and/or packet loss. sounds in first instance like a flaky connection or routing changes. try to disable any DOS detection/prevention mechanisms in the firmware of the speedport. if there is any, moslt

[pfSense] IPSec VPN connected by no traffic passing through

2014-05-19 Thread Peter Collins
Hi, I have a pfsense behind a Telekom Speedport W921v which connects a IPSec VPN to a Palo Alto device which has been working fine for months. However last night traffic stopped for no apparent reason. The pfsense WAN address is a 192.168.2.0/24 provided by DHCP om the Speedport and there is no f