throughput at any speed). I
would be extremely hesitant to use these devices in a production system.
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
the
gateway monitor and the static route, and submit it.
I opened an issue in the pfSense Redmine to track this:
http://redmine.pfsense.com/issues/2513
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
;
> Cheers
>
> ** **
>
> Gavin
>
>
> **
>
Hello,
pfSense uses absolute path URLs (i.e. starting with a slash but without the
domain name; view the source of the page to see this), you would need your
proxy to rewrite lin
previously using home-grade wireless routers (Linksys, Belkin, etc). All
of them had fiber (range 15mbit to 100mbit), so I know these boxes can
handle that load. Two of them were running Squid and Squidguard.
If you do go this route, stay away from Dell machines older than the
Optiplex GX280. The
>
> *open socket2*
>
> *Connect to server*
>
> *error: 10060*
>
> *error: 10060*
>
> *error: 10060*
>
> *error: 10060*
>
>
> Note that my firewall WAN address is 201.65.126.240, could be my firewall
> settings wrong.
>
> Thanks
>
> Joseph.
&
gt; WAN
>>>
>>> TCP
>>>
>>> any
>>>
>>> any
>>>
>>>200.6.14.60
>>>
>>> 3001
>>>
>>> 192.168.9.10
>>>
>>> 5001
>>>
>>>
>>>
>&g
those ports. It seemed to work just fine.
Are you trying to put the alias in the "End Port" box on the rule page?
AFAIK, you only need to put it in the "Start Port" box (though pfSense
will copy it to the other box after you save the rule).
What version of pfSense are you runni
tter which computer sent the request. Without the
Outbound NAT rules, any computer that has 1-to-1 NAT set up for it will
send traffic to this destination on its regular address and be blocked by
their firewall.
To answer your new question, here is a quote from the Outbound NAT
build logs on the snapshot server, you will also see the
VMWare builds there.
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:05 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> The docs (http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/VMwareAppliance) state that
> there is no longer a c
NS records but it
simplifies configuration and improves response times from the server.
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Nelson Serafica wrote:
> I've pfsense with port forwarding running fine if the rules is WAN to
> LAN bu
as any open ports, you run this
risk. In one school where I volunteer, they have students playing with the
cables create a loop and bring down the whole network at least one a month.
(I have almost convinced them to buy boxes with locks for the network
switches instead of leaving t
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> On 2012-03-20 07:25, Chris Bagnall wrote:
>
>> On 19/3/12 11:54 pm, Moshe Katz wrote:
>>
>>> I have ICMP blanket allowed on both pfSense installations that I have
>>> (home
>>> and work).
>&
.
I have heard that the reason Google keeps ICMP open is for marketing. If
you know that you can ping Google to help troubleshoot your internet
connectivity, you just remember Google for one more thing they can help you
with.
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
___
mething else in your configuration that is doing that.
Try rebooting the box if you can so it will reload all the configs from
disk.
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle <
slackmoeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
Is this the setup you have right now (or have you plugged in some other
router/firewall for now) because I can get to the web site at the address
in the screenshots.
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Jason
ve.
Moshe
------
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle <
slackmoeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Moshe,
>
> > I created an alias with the INTERNAL addresses of all web servers. The
>
/28 from our Verizon
FiOS. We created Virtual IPs for alll of the addresses and we are using
1:1 NAT for all of our servers which themselves have private IPs. It works
just fine.
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
_
IPv6 implementation, we'd (as
an industry) be a lot further on than we are.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Chris
> --
> This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
> ___
> List mailing list
> List@lists.pfsense.org
> htt
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:08 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> 2012/1/25 Jürgen Echter :
>
> You're using Reject rather than Block, which operates only on TCP/UDP.
> Any other packet type will not match that rule.
>
> db
> ___
> List mailing list
> List@lists.
r rules are actually
"block" rules (red icons) and that they are enabled.
I'm sorry if this sounds like a stupid question but did you make sure your
IP address is not the one that is allowed through in the first rules?
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.
Information widget, I see "Unable to check for updates". This is with Nano
> i386 2.0.1 and I saw the same thing with 2.0. Do I need to tell it where to
> look for updates or do I need to create a rule to allow it to look for
> updates or do I just ignore that message?
>
&
Here's what I have: http://updates.pfsense.org/_updaters
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
2011/12/24 Przemysław Pawełczyk
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:46:04 +0100
> Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> > You people with i386 2.0.1,
house, this will likely not make a difference.
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Air Zonk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before I go buy a Linksys from Best Buy,
>
> Can I use a Pentium III class PC, plus
Thank you very much to everyone who completed the survey.
- Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Moshe Katz wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am a long-time pfSense user and currently a student studying
few minutes to fill
out my survey. It's at
http://opencs.umd.edu/survey/index.php?sid=69279&lang=en.
Thank you all again,
Moshe
------
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- mmk...@umd.edu
-- +1(301)867-3732
___
List mailing
says:
266mhz will get you 10-20Mbps
866mhz will get you 50-200Mbps
I have not found any benchmarks of pfSense on Nokia IP___.
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Patrick Coppens wrote:
> On 2/11/2011 14:05, Mo
I just finished researching pfSense on the similar IP380. From what I have
seen, it works well.
You have to install the hard drive in a different computer first in order
to do the installation because the IPxxx cannot boot from CD. After
pfSense is installed, you put the drive back in the firewa
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> > Thanks for the thoughts on these questions. A few more related:
> >
> > Is there a listing of the addon-package differences between x86 and
> > x64? In particular, I'm curious if squid, squidguard, and notes
> > are available for x64 bec
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
