Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3.x 32bit?
derp. I'm running 2.3.3 dev on one box which is where I got confused. On 2016-11-02 12:45, Ryan Coleman wrote: https://blog.pfsense.org/?cat=53 <https://blog.pfsense.org/?cat=53> 2.3.2 is current. On Nov 2, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> wrote: On 2016-11-02 12:40, Eero Volotinen wrote: Well, it just don't find any updates. (from console or from webgui) Eero 2016-11-02 19:29 GMT+02:00 Renato Botelho <ga...@freebsd.org>: > On 2 Nov 2016, at 14:59, Eero Volotinen <eero.voloti...@iki.fi> wrote: > > thanks. > > Any idea why I cannot upgrade 2.2.x (32bit) to 2.3.x from console/gui You should, What is the error you are experiencing? -- Renato Botelho is 2.3 actually released? I'm running dev snaps, but. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3.x 32bit?
On 2016-11-02 12:40, Eero Volotinen wrote: Well, it just don't find any updates. (from console or from webgui) Eero 2016-11-02 19:29 GMT+02:00 Renato Botelho <ga...@freebsd.org>: > On 2 Nov 2016, at 14:59, Eero Volotinen <eero.voloti...@iki.fi> wrote: > > thanks. > > Any idea why I cannot upgrade 2.2.x (32bit) to 2.3.x from console/gui You should, What is the error you are experiencing? -- Renato Botelho is 2.3 actually released? I'm running dev snaps, but. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] bind DNS question
On 2016-10-04 11:24, Satish Patel wrote: Yes.. when i checked jnl file contents it has many entries but not a single reflected to DB file. One more question. if i have some static entries then i can update them using WEB GUI right? or should i use freeze and thaw option with rndc ? not sure. This is a pfSense question :( On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> wrote: On 2016-10-04 11:19, Satish Patel wrote: Sorry for late reply but very weird happened.. I used following command rndc sync -clean it deleted jnl file but didn't update any single entry on .DB file. is that what it does? it should have updated the live db file.. (I don't use bind on my pfSense boxen, but do use it on my freeBSD host. ) are you sure you don't see the changes? On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> wrote: On 2016-09-23 12:24, Satish Patel wrote: Thanks! Even after restarting named data didn't move from .jnl file to zone.DB file. any other stuff i should check ? rndc sync: sync [-clean] Dump changes to all dynamic zones to disk, and optionally remove their journal files. sync [-clean] zone [class [view]] Dump a single zone's changes to disk, and optionally remove its journal file. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] bind DNS question
On 2016-10-04 11:19, Satish Patel wrote: Sorry for late reply but very weird happened.. I used following command rndc sync -clean it deleted jnl file but didn't update any single entry on .DB file. is that what it does? it should have updated the live db file.. (I don't use bind on my pfSense boxen, but do use it on my freeBSD host. ) are you sure you don't see the changes? On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> wrote: On 2016-09-23 12:24, Satish Patel wrote: Thanks! Even after restarting named data didn't move from .jnl file to zone.DB file. any other stuff i should check ? rndc sync: sync [-clean] Dump changes to all dynamic zones to disk, and optionally remove their journal files. sync [-clean] zone [class [view]] Dump a single zone's changes to disk, and optionally remove its journal file. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] bind DNS question
On 2016-09-23 12:24, Satish Patel wrote: Thanks! Even after restarting named data didn't move from .jnl file to zone.DB file. any other stuff i should check ? rndc sync: sync [-clean] Dump changes to all dynamic zones to disk, and optionally remove their journal files. sync [-clean] zone [class [view]] Dump a single zone's changes to disk, and optionally remove its journal file. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] Old pfSense versions
On 2016-07-31 20:18, Chris Bagnall wrote: Greetings list, Until fairly recently, there used to be a comprehensive set of old versions/builds available at: http://files.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/old/ However, that url is now returning 404. Has the archive been moved? I ask because 2.0.3 is the last version that runs reliably (i.e. doesn’t run out of RAM) on the older ALIX boards with 128MB, and I need to do a CF card replacement on one tomorrow... Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Chris earlier this week: On 07/13/2016 05:06 AM, Herwig Unterrichter wrote: I am having troubles finding a certain older pfsense release, in particular 2.2.4, the memstick am64 image. Is there some kind of archive server where i can get access to all previous releases? https://atxfiles.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/old/ Jim -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] 2.3_1 ?
It will restart on its own Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S7. Original message From: Bob Gustafson <bob...@rcn.com> Date: 5/5/16 4:36 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> Cc: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> Subject: Re: [pfSense] 2.3_1 ? On 05/05/2016 03:13 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2016-05-05 15:11, Bob Gustafson wrote: >> On 05/05/2016 02:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >>> On 2016-05-05 14:23, Bob Gustafson wrote: >>>> On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>>> On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather <p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 5, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Vick Khera <vi...@khera.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeppe Øland <jol...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does this update actually work? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After hitting install and crunching for a while, it showed >>>>>>>> "firmware >>>>>>>> installation failed!" at the top. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just did the upgrade and it succeeded. However, ntpd was not >>>>>>> restarted on >>>>>>> either of the two systems upgraded. I had to manually restart ntpd. >>>>>> >>>>>> Same here. In fact, in my case, ntpd ended up in the stopped >>>>>> state, and I had to start it manually. >>>>> it’s documented that you need to (re)start NTP manually. >>>>> >>>> I haven't yet upgraded to 2.3+ >>>> >>>> My question is whether ntpd is dead on every reboot of pfSense, or >>>> just the one after upgrading? >>> 2.3 to 2.3_1 is NO reboot. >>> >> What does "2.3 to 2.3_1 is NO reboot" mean? >> >> Does it mean that even through power failures, the little pfSense >> soldiers on - pinging ntp even without power? > No, the upgrade from 2.3 to 2.3_1 does *NOT* force a reboot. > > You just need to restart the ntpd service. I'm sorry to be so dense on this subject... My question assumes that the box *has been upgraded* to 2.3_1 - perhaps yesterday. And nptd has been started just after the upgrade. Along comes a power failure. Then the power is restored to the box. When the pfSense within the box is running, is the ntpd running, or does it (again) need to be restarted manually? ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] 2.3_1 ?
On 2016-05-05 15:11, Bob Gustafson wrote: On 05/05/2016 02:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-05-05 14:23, Bob Gustafson wrote: On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather <p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Vick Khera <vi...@khera.org> wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeppe Øland <jol...@gmail.com> wrote: Does this update actually work? After hitting install and crunching for a while, it showed "firmware installation failed!" at the top. I just did the upgrade and it succeeded. However, ntpd was not restarted on either of the two systems upgraded. I had to manually restart ntpd. Same here. In fact, in my case, ntpd ended up in the stopped state, and I had to start it manually. it’s documented that you need to (re)start NTP manually. I haven't yet upgraded to 2.3+ My question is whether ntpd is dead on every reboot of pfSense, or just the one after upgrading? 2.3 to 2.3_1 is NO reboot. What does "2.3 to 2.3_1 is NO reboot" mean? Does it mean that even through power failures, the little pfSense soldiers on - pinging ntp even without power? No, the upgrade from 2.3 to 2.3_1 does *NOT* force a reboot. You just need to restart the ntpd service. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] 2.3_1 ?
On 2016-05-05 14:23, Bob Gustafson wrote: On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather <p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Vick Khera <vi...@khera.org> wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeppe Øland <jol...@gmail.com> wrote: Does this update actually work? After hitting install and crunching for a while, it showed "firmware installation failed!" at the top. I just did the upgrade and it succeeded. However, ntpd was not restarted on either of the two systems upgraded. I had to manually restart ntpd. Same here. In fact, in my case, ntpd ended up in the stopped state, and I had to start it manually. it’s documented that you need to (re)start NTP manually. I haven't yet upgraded to 2.3+ My question is whether ntpd is dead on every reboot of pfSense, or just the one after upgrading? 2.3 to 2.3_1 is NO reboot. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] WLAN reboot loop
On 2016-02-25 08:29, Sean Pohl wrote: I started over with a fresh install and was able to get the wireless working by putting it on a different subnet from the LAN. Then I made firewall rules that allowed the two to communicate. Thank you! One follow-up question though. As I was setting the rules for the two subnets to communicate, I was wondering if things like mDNS/Apple Bonjour/zeroconf or link-local traffic would pass between the two subnets with Layer 3 firewall rules separating them? I think that mDNS uses UDP port 5353 but I thought it also would send to an Ethernet MAC as well. My generic concern is that have small IoT devices or older devices that only send to Ethernet MAC addresses and the Layer 3 firewall rules between the two segments may break some things and not others. Have you or anyone else encountered this problem? Just curious why a bridge interface has problems or should be avoided? Many thanks. Install the avahi/mDNS package and enable the wide-area stuff. I have a similar setup for my house with WiFi on one subnet and Wired on a different one. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
[pfSense] pf/ipv6/RFC1323: Problem?
Can someone on the pfSense team look at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207215 Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
[pfSense] rtadvd crashing?
I have a new(to me) pfSense 2.2.6-RELEASE amd64 router/firewall with full IPv6 connectivity through Time Warner Cable. I noticed that after a reboot, rtadvd was not running. Restarting it and doing rtadvctl enable for my local interfaces (LAN, and 2 WiFi), it stays running. Ideas on why it's crashing? Also, I note when I add a new interface, I have to boot the Firewall to get IPv6 addresses SLAAC assigned to the new interface, is this expected? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
