Hello Walter,
to what project from which Jim are you refering to, do you have a link?
best
- Original Message -
From: Walter Parker walt...@gmail.com
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List list@lists.pfsense.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:49:52 PM
Subject: Re:
- Martin Fuchs mar...@fuchs-kiel.de wrote:
Same under pfSense 2.1.2
Any hints ?
Could it be helpful to play with the base ans skew values ?
Hi Martin,
could it be related to problems with the arpinger? What are your gateway status
look like?
best
Ray
Just a shot in the wild.
Did you have state killing disabled in the setup?
Otherwise more information is needed on this.
Normally apinger should be way better on 2.1 that it was on 2.0
because a lot of work went into that.
Hello Ermal,
I guess you refer to this option:
State
- Raimund Sacherer r...@logitravel.com wrote:
Hello,
I installed on the weekend our new firewall system. It consists of two
Dell R210 with intel (igb) 2-port interface cards.
The old system was 2.0-RELEASE.
We have 11 Gateways configured, it's a mix of WAN's and LAN-Type
interconnects
- Raimund Sacherer r...@logitravel.com wrote:
Hello,
I installed on the weekend our new firewall system. It consists of two Dell
R210 with intel (igb) 2-port interface cards.
The old system was 2.0-RELEASE.
We have 11 Gateways configured, it's a mix of WAN's and LAN-Type
Hello,
I installed on the weekend our new firewall system. It consists of two Dell
R210 with intel (igb) 2-port interface cards.
The old system was 2.0-RELEASE.
We have 11 Gateways configured, it's a mix of WAN's and LAN-Type interconnects
with 2 other companys. We have a couple of ADSL's,
Hello,
we are currently testing pfSense 2.0.3 (i386) and I have the following problems
with the flow export (i386, because Chris said at the Amsterdam pfSense
training course that it is still preferable to use i386 if you do not need more
then the 4Gig of ram, because it's better tested,
Hello,
we are currently configuring a new firewall with 2.0.2 which will replace our
first 2.0 install. On the new 2.0.2 I have a problem with the Dashboard Widget
Traffic Graphs. I close and open different interfaces and when clicking on
Save Settings I loose all configurations and only the
Ok,
Thank you,
best
Ray
- Original Message -
From: Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org
To: Raimund Sacherer r...@logitravel.com, pfSense support and discussion
list@lists.pfsense.org
Sent: Jueves, 7 de Febrero 2013 16:27:42
Subject: Re: [pfSense] 2.0.2 Install and Dashboard problems
On 2/7
Hi,
first I would do a packet capture on the console, and only capture the sip
packets, not the rtp packets, this will only amount to a rather small packet
size and as the SDP and the SIP Invites and ACK are important that's all you
need to debug.
We use FreeSWITCH behind pfSense for some
Hello,
do you deploy by any means ADSL from different providers? We had this scenario
and the problem is that lot's of companies (gMail, hotmail, msn, ms-technet,
etc.) do use CDN's with different access points for different providers. Now
when you get to http traffic, in our case it happend
Hello,
do you deploy by any means ADSL from different providers? We had this scenario
and the problem is that lot's of companies (gMail, hotmail, msn, ms-technet,
etc.) do use CDN's with different access points for different providers. Now
when you get to http traffic, in our case it happend
Well,
I am not sure, but I think it's not *impossible* to do, as a matter of fact,
there are quite some docs in the wiki and the forums.
Basically what you can do is:
configure a different network between the ADSL/Cable router and your own, e.g.
10.10.1.0/28 with IP 10.10.1.14 for the ADSL
On 3/14/2012 4:08 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Is there DNS resolution in aliases (pfSense 2.x)? Is it possible
to
create an alias, for example, named bunch of servers, and in the
hosts, instead of entering the IP address, enter a DNS name?
Yes.
A
To push it even further, if it is
I would wish that pfSense integrates a simple REST API for functionality like
that:
* Add/Remove IP to/from alias
* Add/Remove Rule X (e.g., we do at times integration work, would be nice to
have GUI in our back-office application that requests a port open to an
internal dev pc, and on submit,
Does this filterdns daemon *change* the addresses or adds them?
What I mean is, if you get multiple IP's from DNS RoundRobin
style, you always have the same batch of IP's, but if they are
loadbalanced in a different way and you retrieve different batchs
of IP's or a different IP at the
On 3/15/2012 10:19 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
As you can see, repos.zend.com.cdngc.net has many, many addresses
(and
the TTL is 20 s!. I doubt it will work if I just put
repos.zend.com in
my alias.
Correct, it won't help you there, it's not likely anything really
will.
Not in
try to create a symlink from libpcap.so.1 to libpcap.so.7 in the directory
where libpcap resides,
if there are no big differences, it will just work
best
ray (another one)
- Original Message -
From: Ray r...@renegade.zapto.org
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011
Hello,
I have a multi-wan setup which is working fine so far.
However, I encounter now this strange szenario.
http session to 195.50.176.111/32:
states:
tcp 195.50.176.111:80 - 192.168.2.60:46437 CLOSED:SYN_SENT
tcp 192.168.2.60:46437 - 10.100.102.1:46136 - 195.50.176.111:80
Hi,
check your outbound nat, you have manual outbound nat configured (AON?).
If so, a source of any may introduce troubles with CARP, at least it did at my
location, I changed the outbound NAT rules from source any to our Internal LANS
(one LAN, one WLAN), just to be sure I added a third rule
to
delete it again!
Hope someone can fix this soon,
best
Raimund Sacherer
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
21 matches
Mail list logo
