On 2016-08-21 05:50, Paul Mather wrote:
Not to sound like an apologist or a shill for the pfSense project, but in the line just above the "Products"
link that you presumably clicked on, right at the very top of the page, is a link labelled "Store". On the
same line as the "Store" link is a "Pa
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2016-08-20 04:02, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 20, 2016, at 3:10 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
>>>
On 2016-08-03 08:43, Steve Yates wrote:
I'm being serious but what is your rationale for not using
pfSense's/NetGate's?
>
On Aug 21, 2016, at 4:03 PM, Bryan D. wrote:
> On 2016-Aug-21, at 5:50 AM, Paul Mather wrote:
>
>> Even on that page it's incorrect to say it "only" offers the XG-2758.
>> That's the only one they show in the main table on that page ...
>
> There's likely good science behind the fact that ne
> Blaming a would-be customer for not seeing/finding something on a
catalog/store/marketing page is probably not a good strategy as it won't
help sales.
I'd 'Like' this myself, but I don't have thumbs.
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org
On 2016-Aug-21, at 5:50 AM, Paul Mather wrote:
> Even on that page it's incorrect to say it "only" offers the XG-2758. That's
> the only one they show in the main table on that page ...
There's likely good science behind the fact that nearly all e-stores will
present (often overwhelming) deta
On 21/08/2016, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
>
>
>> I started at https://pfsense.org/, then clicked on Products, which took me
>> to https://pfsense.org/products/ which only offers
>> https://store.pfsense.org/XG-2758/ when I was looking for a new product
On Aug 21, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2016-08-20 04:02, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>> On Aug 20, 2016, at 3:10 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
>>>
On 2016-08-03 08:43, Steve Yates wrote:
I'm being serious but what is your rationale for not using
pfSense's/NetGate's?
h
Who is reselling lanner units in europe?
I just bought one lanner unit from china.it looks perfect for my home
usage..
Eero
21.8.2016 10.22 ap. "Kendrick Vargas" kirjoitti:
> Don't know how late I am to the game on this suggestion, but I am quite
> happy with the Lanner Inc. product I bought.
Don't know how late I am to the game on this suggestion, but I am quite
happy with the Lanner Inc. product I bought. I was able to get them to sell
me a single unit, the cost was fine for my needs (at the time an Atom
D510). They're rackable, and my FW-7539 has been running non-stop for
years. I ca
On 2016-08-20 04:02, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Aug 20, 2016, at 3:10 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2016-08-03 08:43, Steve Yates wrote:
I'm being serious but what is your rationale for not using pfSense's/NetGate's?
https://www.pfsense.org/products/
The "cheap" part (< $299)? We tried a "build our
-- Jim
> On Aug 20, 2016, at 3:10 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
>
>> On 2016-08-03 08:43, Steve Yates wrote:
>> I'm being serious but what is your rationale for not using
>> pfSense's/NetGate's?
>>
>> https://www.pfsense.org/products/
>>
>> The "cheap" part (< $299)? We tried a "build our own" ap
On 2016-08-03 08:43, Steve Yates wrote:
I'm being serious but what is your rationale for not using pfSense's/NetGate's?
https://www.pfsense.org/products/
The "cheap" part (< $299)? We tried a "build our own" approach and it's tough
to get a small package. Any old PC will do just fine if one
Jim,
I have to say that I agree with everything that you wrote. I am no stranger
to the problems and concerns that plague funding of open-source software,
and to the one-sided expectation of many (perhaps even most) users.
My original concern was merely about implications of the particular
messag
+1
On 08/04/2016 06:50 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
Open source is no different, there are sill value exchanges that must exist.
All sides must be content with the exchange.
I look forward to your response.
Jim
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.p
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Moshe Katz wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm reading too much into points 1 (second paragraph) and 4 of your
> message, but it sounds somewhat hostile to the old use-your-own-hardware
> selling point that brought me into the pfSense community ten years ago in the
> first plac
Ahh, well, it’s hard to tell when you don’t give a name but a blanket response
without a quoted email.
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:59 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> My response was not directed at you, Ryan.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>
>> Correction. Instead t
Jim,
As a long-time member of this list, a former contributor (and hopefully
future contributor again once my work allows), and a major proponent of
pfSense any time I hear anyone talking about purchasing new firewalls (I
even wrote a paper back in college about using and contributing back to
pfSe
My response was not directed at you, Ryan.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Correction. Instead the system is ON an open-SOURCE platform.
>
> > On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> >
> > Instead the system is open platform.
>
> _
Correction. Instead the system is ON an open-SOURCE platform.
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>
> Instead the system is open platform.
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with
Jim,
I realize that - I’ve purchased thousands of dollars of your branded equipment
to be installed at my corporate customer sites. However I find them lacking in
some regards and have moved on to buying other hardware.
If you wanted to sell just your hardware to support the system you’d find a
Here's all you need to know:
1) we only test releases on the hardware we sell, or have sold in the past
two years. (Obviously doesn't include VM images.)
We don't intentionally break anything, but your J1900 box isn't in the test
matrix, nor will it ever be. That said, we have included
fixes fo
I put a Kill-a-Watt meter on it and measured it. During boot-up, it
spiked around 58 watts. After settling down at boot, it seems to run
consistently at 32-34 watts. Processor utilization rarely exceeds 6%. I
run different firewall software but am running a web proxy with AV,
snort, intermitten
I can only second what everyone else has said...
If cheap is 'best', grab any old box and throw some NICs in it. Downsides
of this approach are power consumption and the associated 'mostly works'
weirdness of used hardware.
I've found a 4 port j1900 board in a case with rack mount brackets that I
Honestly that j1900 looks like a really great choice.
I think the right questions would be whether you can tolerate the VGA
console, whether it will cost more in terms of power consumption,
whether you need the AES-NI instructions. I was going to mention ECC
ram, but the netgate box appears t
And there are many people on the list here who have vouched for the J1900 box
mentioned earlier.
I am pretty sure we’ve vetted it; I know I have and I am going to start
deploying it at customer sites over NetGate hardware.
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 10:58 AM, Karl Fife wrote:
>
> +1
>
> You can b
Mine is footprint vs function. For $200 I have a box that takes up less room on
the wall than the NetGate product and offers more functionality (the J1900
device mentioned earlier).
The SG-2220 is $100 more than I paid with half the ports.
I’ll pass.
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 10:43 AM, Steve Yates
] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 2:37 AM
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
Subject: [pfSense] looking for perfect pfsense box for home?
Any ideas where to find perfect pfsense box for home usage.
Must be cheap and silent? netgate device? shuttle box?
__
ailing List
Subject: [pfSense] looking for perfect pfsense box for home?
Any ideas where to find perfect pfsense box for home usage.
Must be cheap and silent? netgate device? shuttle box?
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinf
Am 2016-08-03 17:15, schrieb Robert Obrinsky:
I am currently using a refurb HP Elite 8200 SFF that I bought through
Newegg. I removed the video card so I could use the built-in video and
added 2 dual port HP gigabit NICs (Intels in reality) from Amazon. It
came with 4 GB RAM, 500 GB hard drive, a
I am currently using a refurb HP Elite 8200 SFF that I bought through
Newegg. I removed the video card so I could use the built-in video and
added 2 dual port HP gigabit NICs (Intels in reality) from Amazon. It
came with 4 GB RAM, 500 GB hard drive, and Core I-5 processor at 3.3
GHz. Very quiet
My home office is protected by a Netgate APU box (which it seems they
have replaced with some other device at the low end now). It is a
little pricey, but they offer great support and it supports the
project in the best way.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Any ideas where
6205007
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero
>>> Volotinen
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 2:37 AM
>>> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing Lis
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856205007
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero
>> Volotinen
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 2:37 AM
>> To: pfSense
iginal Message-
> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero
> Volotinen
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 2:37 AM
> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
> Subject: [pfSense] looking for perfect pfsense box for home?
>
> Any ideas w
Support and Discussion Mailing List
Subject: [pfSense] looking for perfect pfsense box for home?
Any ideas where to find perfect pfsense box for home usage.
Must be cheap and silent? netgate device? shuttle box?
--
Eero
___
pfSense mailing list
Any ideas where to find perfect pfsense box for home usage.
Must be cheap and silent? netgate device? shuttle box?
--
Eero
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
36 matches
Mail list logo