Has anyone had any kind of success running an open source or commercial
alternative to riverbed for WAN optimization? It would be great if some of
solution like this was available and even better if we could run it inside of
pfsense. Cheers.
James
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:50 AM, James Caldwell
jamescaldw...@hurricanecs.com wrote:
Has anyone had any kind of success running an open source or commercial
alternative to riverbed for WAN optimization? It would be great if some of
solution like this was available and even better if we
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:50 PM, James Caldwell
jamescaldw...@hurricanecs.com wrote:
Has anyone had any kind of success running an open source or commercial
alternative to riverbed for WAN optimization? It would be great if some of
solution like this was available and even better if we could
I cannot see any centralized information on setting up a watchdog timer in
pfSense 2, I do see some random posts about peoples nics emitting messages about
timeouts and some specific motherboards and their capabilities.
Other than reading
We use traffic squeezer between two end points in our WAN (using UBNT links
that natively support about 50mbps) and we are seeing 90mbps or so on average
Great tool
We use them transparently however on the end points -
not really a Wan Optimization - just in between links - but works very
On Apr 12, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Warren Baker war...@decoy.co.za wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:50 PM, James Caldwell
jamescaldw...@hurricanecs.com wrote:
Has anyone had any kind of success running an open source or commercial
alternative to riverbed for WAN optimization? It would be
Hi Jim,
That’s very interesting. If not directly integrated into pfsense how do you
envision it might take shape? What do you think of Glenn Kelley’s comment
about the very impressive numbers he’s been getting using Traffic Squeezer?
James
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, James Caldwell jamescaldw...@hurricanecs.com
wrote:
Hi Jim,
That’s very interesting. If not directly integrated into pfsense how do you
envision it might take shape?
In general I'm not ready to discuss pfSense futures on list.
However, if you think of
A couple years ago when the topic of CPU hyper threading came up I remember
folks being advised to disable it. Is that still the prevailing wisdom and
current best practice?
Thank you.
-Nate
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
On 2013-04-12 13:18, Nathan C. Smith wrote:
A couple years ago when the topic of CPU hyper threading came up I remember
folks being advised to disable it. Is that still the prevailing wisdom and
current best practice?
On P4 series CPUs, you should absolutely disable it.
On modern CPUs,
10 matches
Mail list logo
