Hi all,
we have redesign our web (www.neuroticweb.com)
Someone tell us the web doesn't show well in safari (when you go to
section menu the content goes down)
Anyone knows why this happen?
thanks,
--
Carlos Rincón Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neurotic, SCP - www.neuroticweb.com
Tel: 938 492 028
This works fine in Safari 2.0.3 (and Opera) for me. Do you mean the sign
post menu at the bottom left of the screen?
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:17:55 +0200, Carlos Rincon Sanchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
we have redesign our web (www.neuroticweb.com)
Someone tell us the web
El mié, 14-06-2006 a las 10:50 +0200, David Storey escribió:
This works fine in Safari 2.0.3 (and Opera) for me. Do you mean the sign
post menu at the bottom left of the screen?
Sorry, the problem is in internal pages (the menú with the tabs).
--
Carlos Rincón Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:16:12 +0200, Carlos Rincon Sanchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El mié, 14-06-2006 a las 10:50 +0200, David Storey escribió:
This works fine in Safari 2.0.3 (and Opera) for me. Do you mean the
sign
post menu at the bottom left of the screen?
Sorry, the problem is in
Sorry Al,You'd use it like:safeEmailBold(james.laugesen, gmail.com, LAUGESEN, , James);Notice the 4 values, 1 per parameter of that function...
So LAUGESEN, is what you want to be bold, and James is the non-bold.Also I think it'd be worth a couple of hours of your time to just play through the JS
El mié, 14-06-2006 a las 11:44 +0200, David Storey escribió:
I can reproduce this in Safari 2.0.3 but it works in the latest nightly
builds of WebKit, so you clearly hit a WebKit bug. In a future release of
Safari it will work but if you want it to work in the current release
you'll
This looks to be working okay in IE6 on XP except for note number three, which
is failing to overlay the text of the following paragraph, making it virtually
unreadable.
(Screen shot attached)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org on behalf of Paula Petrik
Sent:
On 06/06/14 10:17 (GMT+0200) Carlos Rincon Sanchez apparently typed:
we have redesign our web http://www.neuroticweb.com/
Someone tell us the web doesn't show well in safari (when you go to
section menu the content goes down)
Anyone knows why this happen?
You can see Safari for yourself on
On 6/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jon,I think you mis-understand me, most of your form controls do have a label, just not properly used.
What you are calling 'encapsulation' does not work in IE, as another member pointed out after me; the association with the form element is
Michael,
You may also want to check the W3C specifications on the use of the LABEL element:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#edef-LABEL
There is no concept in the specification of implicit relationship between a LABEL element being next to a form control. You need to use the FOR
Jon,
If you read that spec yourself you will see:
To associate a label with another control implicitly, the control element must
be within the contents of the LABEL element.
However that is the HTML4 spec of what is valid, not the WCAG spec for what is
advisable (which I have quoted before) and
Hey Jon,
You are missing the point I think:
All of the form controls use explicit LABELs so that there is no need for
a screen reader to go into TITLE or TABLE reading mode to hear the label when a
control gets focus.
The adding of a title to the whole form means that every untitled
I don't think you will ever find a unified agreement on the way naming
conventions are used. Even after a couple of replies, you can clearly
see that even people promoting web standards can use different styles.
The only advice I can really give is be consistent, or you'll just end
up
So I use PascalCase for classes and camelCase for ID's.
What's the benefits of using PascalCase for classes? It's not as if you
don't know which is which, id= and class= are pretty apparent.
I'd say camelCase for sure. But I have been brought up on C, C++, Java,
and I still insist on it in C#.
On 6/15/06, Mike Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We now have all the recordings made at the recent Webstock conference
www.webstock.org.nz available from the site.
Excellent! Good work Mike! Now I can relive the goodness! :-D
D
**
The
Hey great!
Um Where can we sign up?
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:55 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Accessible Content magazine - available online
Sorry forgot the links :-((
Accessible Content
magazine[http://www.accessiblecontent.com/index.php?view=home]
Is a print magazine available free to subscribers (you need to pay for
mailing costs)
Online versions of the magazine are available to subscribers as soon as
the print version
Title: Re: [WSG] Question about naming CSS elements
On 14/6/06 1:56 PM, James Laugesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL hahah I stand corrected, thanks Kevin =8-)
So I use PascalCase for classes and camelCase for ID's.
PS For a bit of a giggle; when I first read your reply I thought , no no,
Title: Re: [WSG] Question about naming CSS elements
PascalCase is a very odd name for a girl,
isnt it?
From:
listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Futter
Sent: Thursday, 15 June 2006 12:25
p.m.
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG]
Adam said:PascalCase is a very odd name for a girl,
isn't it?I was thinking the same thing, hahah.Just think of all the trouble she'll have with people miss-casing her name =8-)On 15/06/06,
Adam Burmister (DSL AK) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PascalCase is a very odd name for a
Title: Re: [WSG] Question about naming CSS elements
On 15/6/06 10:43 AM, Adam Burmister (DSL AK) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PascalCase is a very odd name for a girl, isnt it?
Yes it is, which is why we decided to drop the Case. Pascal is a boys name in French and means passover in Hebrew
David Dixon wrote:
The only advice I can really give is be consistent, or you'll just end
up confusing not just yourself, but anyone else who has to look through
your code.
I would recommend that one of the following would be most useful (for
popularity, and understandability):
PascalCase
Oooo very cool.Is the last 'a' pronounced long or short?On 15/06/06, Kevin Futter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 15/6/06 10:43 AM, Adam Burmister (DSL AK)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PascalCase is a very odd name for a girl, isn't it?
Yes it is, which is why we decided to drop the 'Case'. Pascal
Title: Re: [WSG] Question about naming CSS elements
Well, the french way of pronouncing that would be Pascaarl with the emphasis on the 2nd syllable ... :)
Nice name!
On 15/6/06 11:13 AM, James Laugesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oooo very cool.
Is the last 'a' pronounced long or short?
On
Hi Cole,
I dunno if I can SOLVE it (and I see the problem in IE), but instead of
conditional comments couldn't you use Tanta's box-model hack to serve
the bottom negative margin to IE?
http://www.tantek.com/CSS/Examples/boxmodelhack.html
I know it's still a hack, but due to the discrepancies
Have you tried conditional comments??Place this in the head section of your code and change the div_name to whatever it should be.!--[if IE] style type=text/css
#div_name {bottom: -4px;} /style![endif]--More info:http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/ccomment_ovw.asp
Just a separate comment on the design...
I know I'm a minority but I am on a 24 inch monitor - 1920 * 1200 resolution
- and the layout kinda breaks... The background image isn't wide enough and
sits way off to the right; the content is way at the top; and the navigation
is way at the bottom left
Del
I have tried IE CC, and it does work for
my purposes. Thanks for weighing in. I was really wondering if I was doing
something wrong in the CSS to cause this, or if its just the nature of
the beast (IE) thats causing the problem.
So, so-far, IE CC is the way Ill go
unless someone
Thanks Paul. I'll take a look. I try to stay away from hacks as much as
possible, but I'll give it a look. Thanks for the link.
Cole
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Paul Bennett
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:41 AM
To:
I just like the look of camelCase - it's easier to read and (as pointed out)
it can be applied to most languages.
But really consistency is the key...
R ;o)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
why not solve it by adding a surrounding div#nav_footer and the
#content_footer , I think it's your only option with ie?
IE bites.
Cole Kuryakin wrote:
Thanks Paul. I'll take a look. I try to stay away from hacks as much as
possible, but I'll give it a look. Thanks for the link.
Cole
Cole Kuryakin wrote:
So, so-far, IE CC is the way I'll go unless someone can say: Hey
Cole, this is what you're doing wrong with your css. Do ***this***
and it'll be fixed without the need to use IE CC
:-)
I just did.
Covering up for one of IE's many whitespace bugs is *not* necessary,
when
Thanks to all for their suggestions regarding my issue.
Georg, however DID solved the issue nicely - and without the need for IE
CC's - with his explanation below.
His instruction about adding an empty comment to each of the two divs in
quested eliminated the problem by 80%; when I completed his
Hello
all,
Does anyone know why
my content jumps in Firefox and not Internet Explorer?
The website is on http://www.apartmentrealty.com.au/site/
When going from page
to page the content jumps in Firefox which is very annoying and I know the
client will complain about it.
Any pointers would
It's the lack of the scroll bar in Firefox when the content doesn't go
past the bottom of the page. It's only there when needed.
You could keep it there all the time with:
html { height:100%; margin-bottom:1px; }
You'll have a 1 pixel amount of scroll on all pages.
Not elegant, but it
On 6/15/06, Germ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HelloIm sorry if this question may seem silly or strange, so if it does please humour meIm starting a web and graphics company with my mate and he has given me the first prototype/ screnshot for our webpage and he has this triangle which Im curious if i
I'd suggest a graphic - a GIF for the triangular piece wouldn't need to be more than a few hundred bytes.
OK cool, I will do that then. I just thought if we can do rounded corners and all this other fancy stuff why not be able to do triangles etc
Before starting a starting a web and graphics
Germ wrote:
Im starting a web and graphics company with my mate and he has given me the
first prototype/ screnshot for our webpage and he has this triangle
which Im curious if i can code it or would I have to use a graphic???
You should probably just use an image image, as the box model only
png8i also thought it wuld be bifty n be good for my pride if it was possible, think i will just stick to graphics and code...On 6/15/06,
Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Germ wrote: Im starting a web and graphics company with my mate and he has given me the first prototype/ screnshot
Germ wrote:
Im starting a web and graphics company with my mate and he has given
me the first prototype/ screnshot for our webpage and he has this
triangle which Im curious if i can code it or would I have to use a
graphic??? I dont really want to use graphics as code is faster to
upload
41 matches
Mail list logo
