Bob,
I know that you didn't intend any offence, and I appreciate that I did
not give the answer that the poster was hoping for, but do I need to
remind everyone of the title of this forum?
As long as we fail to implement existing standards such as
border-radius, IE can legitimately say there is no
kind, I won't
use this bit of code.
However I was curious as to your remark --all I can say is...wow *shakes
head*
Sharron
- Original Message -
From: Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Rounded
I have not been following this thread so much so bare with me here! If I am totally in left field ignore me. =)I cannot speak for Patrick, but what I think that he is shaking his head at is the class names, the amount of class names, and markup that lacks semantic value. I realize that the
code, I think I would prefer to remain ignorant.
Sharron
- Original Message -
From:
James
O'Neill
To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:13
AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Rounded Corners
I have not been following this thread so much so bare with me
James O'Neill wrote:
Validating is a great start.
But doesn't guarantee anything other than you've used the right
syntax. It's the same as running a spell check in your word processor:
it can tell you if you've misspelled words, but it can't tell you if
what you've written makes any sense
: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janos Hardi
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 1:06 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Rounded Corners
Hi,
This solution has nothin to do with common semantics - not
recommended.
Janos
On 7/22/06, Al
has been supported by Mozilla for
a long time.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janos Hardi
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 1:06 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Rounded Corners
Hi,
This solution
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which has been supported by Mozilla for
a long time.
Mike
-
Good
Hi, I have been playing with Spiffy Corners @ http://www.spiffycorners.com/ for an Intranet but the Spiffy assures that it is Anti-aliased rounded corners using pure CSS. No Images. No _javascript_. No fluff. I can assume you that it is very easy to implement and scalable. Works on Macs too.
Steve Eades wrote:
Hi, I have been playing with Spiffy Corners @
http://www.spiffycorners.com/ for an Intranet but the Spiffy assures
that it is Anti-aliased rounded corners using pure CSS. No Images. No
Javascript. No fluff. I can assume you that it is very easy to
implement and scalable.
Paul Novitski wrote:
If you call me a conservativist you're right :) I hope we can find a
way to the realm of the rounded corners without solutions like this.
Sure -- we can just use SPAN or DIV instead.
But that still litters the markup with empty, meaningless elements which
are there
Jorge Laranjo wrote:
Hi! I was trying NiftyCube for make rounded corner on my new website.
But if I use (as I do) dimensions in em or % insted of px this library
doesn't work so ok.
NiftyCube is a Javascript library that makes possibile to have rounded
corners with xhtml + css and without
Also, in happy times when multiple background images are commonly
supported getting rid of one script... is easier than fishing out
all extra divs, spans, etc.
Looks to me like the CSS3 working draft for border-radius and multiple
background-images won't solve much beyond the ordinary round
At 10:10 AM 7/23/2006, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Is there a standard-compliant and 'semantically clean' way to generate
the extra elements/style-hooks needed for something like what's in this
test-page...
http://www.gunlaug.no/homesite/main_6_xv.html
...that'll work in most browsers?
Georg,
Your
Paul Novitski wrote:
http://www.gunlaug.no/homesite/main_6_xv.html
Your basic structure looks like it would be easy to implement in
JavaScript or PHP.
Good. I'm almost completely lost when it comes to both Javascript and
PHP, so I couldn't get any further on my own ;-)
In short: I need
Hi,
This solution has nothin to do with common semantics - not recommended.
Janos
On 7/22/06, Al Kendall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try these http://www.html.it/articoli/nifty/index.html
Cheers!!!
Al
**
The discussion list for
Scott Swabey wrote:
Seems like the use of semantically neutral elements to create
imageless rounded corners is more than acceptable. Am I missing
something?
Apart from bloated source-code(?), no, I don't think you have missed
anything :-)
Personally, I think bloated source-code should be
On 7/22/06, Al Kendall wrote:
try these http://www.html.it/articoli/nifty/index.html
At 05:06 AM 7/22/2006, Janos Hardi wrote:
This solution has nothin to do with common semantics - not recommended.
Janos, may I assume that it's the use of the B tag you're objecting
to, rather than
hello, there are extensive lists of several css-only and css js methods for creating rounded corners on
http://chronotron.wordpress.com/2006/05/14/nifty-css-rounded-corners-extensive-list/and
http://www.econsultant.com/web-developer/css-rounded-corners/
there. greetinx from viennaOn 7/21/06,
try these http://www.html.it/articoli/nifty/index.htmlCheers!!!AlOn 7/22/06,
Jorge Laranjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! I was trying NiftyCube for make rounded corner on my new website.But if I use (as I do) dimensions in em or % insted of px this librarydoesn't work so ok.NiftyCube is a
20 matches
Mail list logo
