Germ wrote:
its just for a flash file which will act as the banner for the top of the
webpage
thanks for links and help
I will look forward to hear the long answer ;)
I have found this method quite useful:
http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1081798064count=1
Kat
On 7/9/06 9:52 PM Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
On 7/10/06, Taco Fleur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got it (sort of) works in Firefox, not explorer.. -
Kind regards,
Taco Fleur
Here's one I quickly cooked up:
http://sandbox.server-logon.com/jstreet/bordertest/
It does
Personally I use a little bit of _javascript_ to handle the eolas patent in IE and the does not have flash alternative content issue, SWFobject is my personal choice. An equally good alternative is
Unobtrusive Flash Objects-- Nick Cowiehttp://nickcowie.com
Taco
For what its worth, I always use
the default cursor (arrow) on my nav hrefs that are nulled (#)
on a landing page. IMO its much better indication that the hover is not
clickable.
Cole
From:
listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taco
Maybe:
dl
dtGroup title/dt
ddGroup title/dd
ddGroup title/dd
ddGroup title/dd
/dl
Or
dl
dth3Group title/h3/dt
ddGroup title/dd
ddGroup title/dd
ddGroup title/dd
/dl
Example with
lih3.../h3/li
li.../li
not so good, because h3.../h3 isn't LIST ITEM,
it is TITLE of LIST ITEMS
I know this may sound stupid and dumb but is there a tag or something that
you would use instead of an embed Just asking as it comes up as a
warning when I valiadate a page im coding at the moment.
Try this: http://www.mauzon.com/?p=36
--
С уважением, pepelsbey.
http://pepelsbey.net
Thanks!
Not sure how you figured out what I was after, after
reading my own cryptic email I would not have made sense out of it
;-)
Yes, I think default out of the available is best to, I
was thinking about the WAIT cursor, because when hovering over the null item we
are really waiting for
On Monday 10 July 2006 16:43, pepelsbey wrote:
Maybe:
dl
dth3Group title/h3/dt
ddGroup title/dd
ddGroup title/dd
ddGroup title/dd
/dl
I think the best option would be:
dl
dth1Group title/h1/dt
ddGroup item/dd
ddGroup item/dd
ddGroup item/dd
/dl
and style
dl
dth1Group title/h1/dt
ddGroup item/dd
ddGroup item/dd
ddGroup item/dd
/dl
Unfortunately, this is invalid. You can also use block level elements in the
definition description, such as the p and ul elements. But you cannot
use block level elements inside a definition
Specifically:
!ELEMENT DT - O (%inline;)* -- definition term --
Pity : \
So... best two solutions, i think:
h1Title/h1
ul
liItem/li
liItem/li
/ul
and
dl
dtTitle/dt
ddItem/dd
ddItem/dd
/dl
or with STRONG
dl
dtstrongTitle/strong/dt
ddItem/dd
ddItem/dd
/dl
--
С
Hi Germ
its just for a flash file which will act as the banner for the top
of the webpage
You will need the object … /object tag.
Check out this excellent article ... I work this way, and code is
widley supported by browsers, and passes validation.
pepelsbey wrote:
I know this may sound stupid and dumb but is there a tag or something
that
you would use instead of an embed Just asking as it comes up as a
warning when I valiadate a page im coding at the moment.
A method suggested to me by Bert Doorn seems excellent, and is very
You shouldn't need a strong emphasis - the dt (definition title) implys that it
has a relevance to the dd () below it and is indeed the title for it.
If you just want it bold you can style it that way in the CSS - which I am sure
you know already.
- Original Message
From: pepelsbey
No, you would use a css ;0)On 10/07/06, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you just want it bold you can style it that way in the CSS which I am sure you know already.pepelsbey wrote: Yep. CSS, i know ;) STRONG just for visual emphasis of DT in unstyled content.
Not so necessary, but looks
Why not simply add a span via DOM inside the anchor, position it abs.
with h/w:100% and the addit. border. Simple, clean and
crossbrowser...ish...
--
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web www.devonstudio.com
**
The discussion list for
I have been told that this menu isall messed upin Safari...
http://www.dbuchter.com/transfer/peapod/new/
anyone know why? looks fine in FF and IE on PC. I'm stumped
thnx,
Warren
**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See
Oskar Krawczyk wrote:
Ok, even better solution can be found in my test zone:
http://blog.olicio.us/public/weblog/fake-inner-border/
No, non-semantic tags, simple CSS. Havent tested on IE, but should work.
It works also under IE. :)
--
Grzesiek
I don't know if this will help, but I added hyper links to my object vs
embed test page. As per different browser they all work differently.
http://www.designbyatfb.com/test/swftest2.html
I don't know what [an error occurred while processing this directive] this
is doing there! lol
-
Title: Re: [WSG] image menu failing in safari
On 7/10/06 1:11 PM, Warren Cardinal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been told that this menu is all messed up in Safari...
http://www.dbuchter.com/transfer/peapod/new/
anyone know why? looks fine in FF and IE on PC. I'm stumped
thnx,
Warren
ok I think I finally got the hyper links that I
added tested in all the browsers I have available. http://www.designbyatfb.com/test/swftest2.html
I do believe that they only work with the swf
object file (SEE EXAMPLE 4)in FF, Mozilla, Opera.
If you went awhile ago to have a look, I aplogize
I've found it to pass under Firefox? And IE.
And in reply to Oskar Krawczyk, this method doesn't have any non-semantic tags
- just a class.
No, non-semantic tags, simple CSS. Havent tested on IE, but should work.
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL
On 10/07/2006, at 3:37 PM, Paul Bennett wrote:
I guess the issue that I'd have would be Joe / Jolene User
accidentally
hitting tab and getting a mysterious chunk of content appear atop
the screen.
Very unlikely scenario. You can safely use :focus without it causing
problems for sited
Oh, beg your pardon. I was thinking FF on PC, I see the issue.
Thanks for the feedback
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Burmister (DSL AK)
Sent: Tuesday, 11 July 2006 7:50 a.m.
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE:
Hi Peter, I've updated the demo code on my sandbox site, would you mind testing
again? I thin I've fixed the firefox and safari issues, but I don't have Shira
or Camino installed on our test machine.
http://labs.flog.co.nz/css-help/inner-border/demo.htm
Here's how it tests out on a Mac:
Thanks everyone, especially Oskar and Adam, I will be using your solutions.
Kind regards,
Taco Fleur
free call 1800 032 982 - fax 07 3414 6464, international +61 7 3325 5103
www.pacificfox.com.au an industry leader with commercial experience since
1994 .
our services:
- online, print,
Hi Peter, I've updated the demo code on my sandbox site, would you
mind testing again? I thin I've fixed the firefox and safari
issues, but I don't have Shira or Camino installed on our test
machine.
Hi Adam
Pass on all five browsers for the Mac! Nice work!
Regards,
Peter
--
Peter
The Web Accessibility Toolbar for Opera [WAT for Opera] now available.
Web Accessibility Tools Consortium [http://www.wat-c.org] members;
Cedric Trevison of The Paciello Group [http://www.paciellogroup.com] and
Steve Faulkner of vision australia [ http://www.visionaustralia.org.au]
have
HI All
I'm drawing a blank on this today.
We have a blog post with some ugly tag soup, courtesy of an inpage editor.
So, ignore the font tags. I've already stripped it down to the bare essence
to check on the behavior and I've got a question about fundamental
block/float performance.
Here's the
I think you're right. FF is rendering it correctly, as the LI and IMG
block-elements are jutting up to each other.
The easiest way I can think of solving it would be to place the image within
the LI.
- Adam
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Adam.
That's an idea. I tried adding display:inline to the list item, but that
removes the bullet. I forgot to mention that earlier.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Adam Burmister (DSL AK)
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006
On 11/7/06 5:50 PM, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/07/2006, at 3:37 PM, Paul Bennett wrote:
I guess the issue that I'd have would be Joe / Jolene User
accidentally
hitting tab and getting a mysterious chunk of content appear atop
the screen.
You can safely use :focus
Hi All :o)
Wondering if you can help me solve an issue:
I'd like to have a list of alphabetical buttons at the top of the page
(you've all seen this kind of navigation).
What I'd like to do is have them with the following features:
1. Single pixel border
2. Some padding around the letter
PS: I should qualify this - obviously the solution needs to
work cross-browser (which is where I'm having the most
difficulty)...
Mainly FireFox and IE (as it's for an internal app) and
they're moving office browsers over from IE to FireFox.
R :o)
- Original Message -
From:
Richard Czeiger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All :o)
Wondering if you can help me solve an issue:
I'd like to have a list of alphabetical buttons at the top of the
page (you've all seen this kind of navigation).
What I'd like to do is have them with the following features:
1.
On Jul 11, 2006, at 2:11 AM, Warren Cardinal wrote:
I have been told that this menu is all messed up in Safari...
http://www.dbuchter.com/transfer/peapod/new/
anyone know why? looks fine in FF and IE on PC. I'm stumped
Step one: validate your mark-up.
Step one one: validate your mark-up.
We Standards are good for SEO (Search Engine Optimzation) too!
You might would like to check two threads running at WebProWorld Forums.
One I started myself: http://www.webproworld.com/viewtopic.php?t=65123
and an another interesting one here:
http://www.webproworld.com/viewtopic.php?t=64982
Thanks Scott, but it didn't work...
This is as far as I've gotten:
http://www.grafx.com.au/wip/alphabeticalList.html
Pretty ugly - lots of FF v IE hacks but if anyone can improve this, I'd love
it!
R :o)
- Original Message -
From: Scott Swabey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
HiI dont know if the subject title is descripted properly as I couldnt really come up with a good namebut anyway the problem:http://www.blazedesigns.com
the links are too close to the side of the border of the divs. I want the image sitting next to the right hand side and the text but not the
On 11/07/06, Germ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but i was wondering if there was another better css way???
use padding, padding: top right bottom left;note : after padding, which is missing in your CSSpadding: 1px 10px 1px 1px; will get the text 10px from the right edge, (note box model problems with
Germ wrote
the links are too close to the side of the border of the divs.
I want the image sitting next to the right hand side and the
text but not the text also sitting on the edge. I also wouldn't
mind having the text middled (vertically) in the image as well.
Modify your #navigation a
Hey thanks for thatThe problem was really bugging me On 7/11/06, Scott Swabey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Modify your #navigation a styles like:#navigation a {color: #FFF;
background-image: url(button.jpg);font-size: 1.3em;font-weight: normal;font-family: Times New Roman;text-decoration:
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Czeiger
Sent: Tuesday, 11 July 2006 10:49 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Alphabetical Listing Buttons
Hi All :o)
Wondering if you can help me solve an
Shlomi Asaf wrote:HiI have a question that crossed my mind, and i wish to get help from youguys: HTML Validation- what is it good for?I try to find the disadvantages of a non validated site against onevalidated, and let me try to explain what i mean.If i build a website, according to his
Dear Shlomi,
Why to validate a code that not made for the validation.
Make the website, follow the restrictions and then validate...
This is still just a validation for as correct coding as possible,
that does not mean it will work exactly perfect i all browsers anyway...
To build the website
44 matches
Mail list logo
