this is great! this song should be on mtv!!!
love it!
:) have a nice weekend
On 11/17/06, Brad Pollard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, thank you! Hilarious. Lets play it at next years web directions and
all
hold hands.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Woznica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I am currently working on a new site
(http://clients.evolutioninteractive.co.uk). It's a work in progress, so
please be gentle.
Anyway the reason for my post is that I have been asked to add a company
structure to the site
More than that it needs a vid for youtube..
its awesome. WSG theme..
Mihael Zadravec wrote:
this is great! this song should be on mtv!!!
love it!
:) have a nice weekend
On 11/17/06, *Brad Pollard* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, thank you! Hilarious. Lets play
having a go trying to help a friend figure out why, in xhtml strict 1.0 the br
/ that are styled in the css style sheet as follows: .sidemenu br
{line-height: 3px; .
However in FF, Netscape and Mozilla it would appear the css style is being
ignored. The space is too high
IE and Opera seem
Maybe should mention that these are menu links that she.
having a go trying to help a friend figure out why, in xhtml strict 1.0 the
br / that are styled in the css style sheet as follows: .sidemenu br
{line-height: 3px; .
However in FF, Netscape and Mozilla it would appear the
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:19:17AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having a go trying to help a friend figure out why, in xhtml strict 1.0
the br / that are styled in the css style sheet as follows: .sidemenu
br {line-height: 3px; .
However in FF, Netscape and Mozilla it
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:36:32AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe should mention that these are menu links that she.
Menu links separated by line break elements?
But a menu is a list of links isn't it?
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/
--
David Dorward
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having a go trying to help a friend figure out why, in xhtml strict
1.0 the br / that are styled in the css style sheet as follows:
*/.sidemenu br {line-height: 3px;/* */./*
*//* [trimmed]
Sharron
A clickable link to this page would help. Otherwise it is a guessing
I have converted a horizontal navigation bar to use list items instead of a
single row table with a table cell for each link. One of the main reasons for
this was so that, when the user increases their font size, the links would wrap
onto the next line instead of the navigation bar extending
I've asked the site owner if I can submitt a link. I will if she gives
permission. However I did try this and it seems to work.
.sidemenu {
font-size: 13px;
font-weight: bold;
width: 100%;
display:block;
margin-top:0;
padding-top: 0;
margin-left: 0;
line-height:20px;
}
.sidemenu br
on 17/11/2006 14:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following:
Maybe should mention that these are menu links
If this is a menu, she should be using a list - not line breaks - for a
whole host of reasons. Styling the padding/margins on the list elements
then becomes a lot easier.
I'm not
http://www.webado.net/webado-net-tpl.php is transitional
http://www.webado.net/webado-net-tpl-strict.php is strict
the above are links to her two pages. These are on her server and do not
reflect any of the playing I've done. lol
I wonder too why the breaks and not a list for the menu? I will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe should mention that these are menu links that she.
Unless I'm missing something, these BR elements could be replaced with a
simple display:block declaration.
On the other hand, I have a question regarding accessibility: is a BR
element as good as a printable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.webado.net/webado-net-tpl.php is transitional
http://www.webado.net/webado-net-tpl-strict.php is strict
Now that I've seen the links in context, I wonder why are the BR for?
I guess they are here in case the document shows without styles applied. But
that
http://www.designbyatfb.com/temp-images/xhtml/index3.html
above is the best I can do, remember I am an amatuer. Netscape and Mozilla
are ignoring a few br / tags in the html between the Webado shop and
Policy links, have no idea why.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having a go trying to help a friend figure out why, in xhtml strict 1.0 the
br / that are styled in the css style sheet as follows: .sidemenu br
{line-height: 3px; .
However in FF, Netscape and Mozilla it would appear the css style is being
ignored. The space is too high
IE and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.designbyatfb.com/temp-images/xhtml/index3.html
above is the best I can do, remember I am an amatuer. Netscape and
Mozilla are ignoring a few br / tags in the html between the Webado
shop and Policy links, have no idea why.
That's because you have *3* BRs in
on 17/11/2006 16:46 Thierry Koblentz said the following:
snip
On the other hand, I have a question regarding accessibility: is a BR
element as good as a printable character when it comes to separate these
links?
No. As far as I am aware, it's equivalent to use whitespace to separate
links
From D-Lib Magazine, v.12(11), 2006:
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november06/peterson/11peterson.html
Excellent.
Indeed:
... The logical step [of MicroFormats to de-centralize behaviour
and appearance of tag-groups] - to add semantic in any
way
Mel wrote:
No. As far as I am aware, it's equivalent to use whitespace to
separate links - which means that it could create probems for some
users. I'm not sure if JAWS 7 can audibly separate the links itself.
Certainly, older screen readers will have problems and, probably,
anyone using a
The week is drawing to an end...many of you have had a week of
nightmare code and semantic nightmares...but never fear - have a
listen to this song and know that you are not alone...
http://www.esanity.co.uk/podcasts/HandsToBoag.mp3
Tonight I need your C-S-S, coding in the dark-ness...
Very
On 16/11/2006, at 12:14 PM, Bojana Lalic wrote:
The only problem is that the behaviour is inconsistent, sometimes
it scrolls the result page to the correct location and sometimes it
doesn't.
It's not a page length thing is it? The page won't scroll if there is
not enough length in the
haha, great way of starting the weekend.
Have a nice one!
Eugenio.
On 11/17/06, Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The week is drawing to an end...many of you have had a week of
nightmare code and semantic nightmares...but never fear - have a
listen to this song and know that
On Nov 18, 2006, at 8:23 AM, James Ellis wrote:
If you run recent version of Konquerer you get a pretty good
realisation of
what Safari will render a site as - all you have to do us run a
Linux box or
if you don't want to do that run up a KDE distro Live CD like Kubuntu.
There are quite a
This may be a little off topic but it relates to testing websites so...
I'm thinking about upgrading and I'd like recommendations for what would
be the best configuration for a freelancer working from home with a
limited amount of space and resources.
I'm after something that provides
On Nov 17, 2006, at 10:12 PM, John Faulds wrote:
I'm after something that provides maximum flexibility when it comes
to testing in OSes, browsers, screen resolutions. Am I able to do
this with just one machine, e.g. a MacBook Pro running Parallels or
a PC running some VM software or
26 matches
Mail list logo
