Re: [WSG] Compliant pop ups

Still nutting this issue out. I found this a good read: http://www.sitepoint.com/article/ajax-screenreaders-work Tending to think though that one of the following approaches is the best way forward (until such time as we have the hooks necessary to gain a readers attention) : 1) As Joseph sugg

[WSG] Daniel Beckitt is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 30/01/2007 and will not return until 05/02/2007. I will respond to your message when I return. Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Queensland Departmen

Re: [WSG] Web standards Vietnam?

Hi, Web standard may not get serious attention in Vietnam right now. However, as a Vietnamese developer, I can say that there are a lot of Vietnamese developers who embrace web standard in their work: PHPVietnam developer: (including me), Standardpoint group If you are seeking for some devel

Re: [WSG] image placement problem

You are welcome, Dwain Some notes : As a class you can use it nicely : Instead of : You could use multiple classes too like : ... The goal is to use a semantic method by avoiding a line like the old method at the end of every container of floated elements cf http://css-discuss.

[WSG] Web standards Vietnam?

Hi all, A very random question on the off-chance that anyone know of any web standards developers in Vietnam? I've tried to do a google search but I'm not getting a lot of love. We're looking for a developer to work out of our Saigon office but from what I can see, web standards isn't really a

Re: [WSG] IE7 and the * html hack - solved

* + html will work nicely in IE7 Regards, Nick. On 30 Jan 2007, at 08:29, Paul Bennett wrote: Hi all, I wound my doctype back to html 4 transitional (remember html 4? Man, those were the days..), validated the code, removed some errors (the Google Mini output code is less than seman

[WSG] IE7 and the * html hack - solved

Hi all, I wound my doctype back to html 4 transitional (remember html 4? Man, those were the days..), validated the code, removed some errors (the Google Mini output code is less than semantic, to put it mildly) and now IE7 and FF render the page in strict/standards mode. IE7 now doesn't honou

RE: [WSG] IE7 and the * html hack

Thanks Nick, Using your location bar trickery (javascript:alert(document.compatMode);) I get 'BackCompat' on both IE and FF. I'm working with the Google Mini for our domain. I've cleaned up the output code a lot, but it's still far from perfect. I'm guessing that some invalid code is causing th

Re: [WSG] IE7 and the * html hack

Quoting Nick Fitzsimons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 29 Jan 2007, at 19:58:47, Paul Bennett wrote: How does one go about finding out whether IE7 is rendering in quirks or standards/strict mode? Try this: Fun! I

Re: [WSG] IE7 and the * html hack

Wikipedia had the following information for determining in which mode your page is being rendered: "[edit] Verifying which rendering mode is in use In most recent browsers, the Document Object Model property document.compatMode indicates the rendering mode for the current page-in standards mode

Re: [WSG] IE7 and the * html hack

On 29 Jan 2007, at 19:58:47, Paul Bennett wrote: How does one go about finding out whether IE7 is rendering in quirks or standards/strict mode? Try this: HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.

RE: [WSG] IE7 and the * html hack

If you have a valid doctype with nothing (or whitespace) on the preceding lines then there's no reason why it should be rendering in quirks mode, I've never experienced this in IE7 anyway. Do you have a link? > -Original Message- > From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org > [mailto:[EMAIL PR

[WSG] IE7 and the * html hack

Hi all, I have a page which should be rendering in standards mode in IE7 (i.e.: it has a doctype and doesn't have the xml prolog). According to Chris Wilson the * html hack should not apply in this case (http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/09/15/467901.aspx) What I'm finding is that IE7 is a

Re: [WSG] Standards War - HTML 5 vs XHTML 2.0

Thanks to all you who replied. I think the most useful was this: On 27/01/07, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: People have gone through what you went through and many of them have done the same thing: go back to HTML 4.01. My reasons for going for xHTML were thanks to Zeldman's

Re: [WSG] Safari - Drop down menu over a flash movie

On 1/26/07 9:51 AM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While mousing, the menu flashes, stutters, etc. I have stopped this behavior > by removing hover effects... I¹ll add that the issue is fixed in WebKit... -- Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph: 518.4

Re: [WSG] search for AJAX enabled web site

http://www.ukrbiznes.com/ uses yandex.ru YAHOO!: http://www.flock.com/start/ http://www.backbase.com/demos/bbsearch/ and in general: http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=search+powered+by+yahoo Personally I prefer Yahoo XML search (Yahoo also supports JSON) M

RE: [WSG] search for AJAX enabled web site

Thanks for the information but can u tell me any site name which uses yandex.ru or yahoo for its internal search purpose? From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vladislav Gorodetskiy Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 2:41 PM To

Re: [WSG] search for AJAX enabled web site

yeah, in Russia we have yandex.ru with xml search API... Yahoo alse supports this feature. 2007/1/29, Nisha Kumari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi All, I know this is a different topic all together to be discussed here. I wanted to enable a website for search. But the search results I am getting now

[WSG] search for AJAX enabled web site

Hi All, I know this is a different topic all together to be discussed here. I wanted to enable a website for search. But the search results I am getting now are not serving my purpose. The website to be search enabled is using AJAX to dynamically put contents in the web pages. While the search en