CK wrote:
Safari does not like the JS pseudo protocol.
What version are you using?
It works in Safari 1.3 and 2.0
cheers,
Geoff.
==
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
threerandot wagner wrote:
I have a Benny Hill website and I am in the process of
developing cleaner code.
Dirty code is probably appropriate for a Benny Hill website.
Sementically correct and all that...
;)
==
Katrina wrote:
Is it recommended to continue to use work-arounds to ensure
accessibility in older browsers?
What work-arounds? Just filter your stylesheets to prevent older browsers
seeing them, and you're done. I use a two step stylesheet to do this:
html:
link rel=stylesheet
Ben Buchanan wrote:
The way it renders things is so incompatible with modern browsers that
basically you end up redoing your CSS entirely to get IE5.2 to work
(using a hack to send IE5.2 a tailored stylesheet). So unless you're
being paid by the hour, just don't...
I wouldn't go that
What is the problem with using an image map and javascript for this sort of
thing?
By using lists and hover states you've limited yourself to rectangular
hotspots, and haven't really gained anything as far as I can see. You've also
lost any ability to have links in the little pop-ups,
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
It's a CSS experiment. It's not a matter of just having to
get something
done. I wanted to challenge myself with trying to combine two
CSS goodies.
An independent solution without JS.
That's great - it's a nice bit of code and it works well. I just
Clearly neither of you are power shoppers. What you need is a table, with
columns for rating importance, quantity, unit price, total price, shelf
location and shelf-life. Then you need a script to sort your table on the fly
by any category.
By the way, if you add Flour you can make banana
And a form that allows you to add new items. Could use DOM scripting to insert
the new items into the table - I think a database back-end is probably
overkill...
Joshua Street wrote:
On 7/12/06, Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clearly neither of you are power shoppers. What you need
Michael Persson wrote:
I have a problem to solve a little problem, I have asked before
for a background swap function and the only one i have found is
what i am using. i am using an Iframe for this.
Now i also have another Image or DIV that need to appear on the
same rollover.
Hi
Michael Persson wrote:
If you read my messages you can see that im not talking about
background color, im
talking about background-images anyway there is no
funtion to swith that what so ever
so i will have to rebuild the pages anyway..
You can lead a horse to water...
Try this:
Janette Girod
This is the code I tested:
var new_ss = document.createElement('link');
new_ss.setAttribute('href','extra.css');
new_ss.setAttribute('rel','stylesheet');
document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(new_ss);
It works in Win/IE5+, FF 1.5, Opera 9, Netscape 7+,
Sunny wrote:
I know how to prevent v.4 browsers from getting my styles, but how do
I stop IE5/Mac from getting them?? All I know how to do is to give
them
something different, not how to exclude them entirely.
see: http://centricle.com/ref/css/filters/
@import url('styles.css'); /*
SunUp wrote:
It's the Mac problem. There's no way my department's budget
will extend to purchasing an old Mac just for testing purposes,
and even if that happened, I'd then have a fight on my hands
with our IT department about network points and security issues.
If I was in that
It's just a bluff - keep srolling and you'll see everything there is to
see.
Geoff.
==
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or copyright
Nishak wrote:
scriptdocument.write(img src=\+imageName2+\ width=\475\
height=\137\);/script
The error is in the quotes. Try:
document.write('img src='+imageName2+' width=475 height=137');
(mixing single and double quotes is a bit easier to read)
cheers,
Geoff
Just discovered using an escaped comment end hack in an inline style
will break in Opera 9 unless it is followed by a semicolon or another
style.
E.g.
p style=color:blue; /*\*/ color:red; /**/ /*\*//*/ color:green;
/**/Some text.../p
* Will be green for Mac IE 5
* Will be red for all other
Ted Drake wrote:
I'm working on a hack and need to know what the default
colors are, when you remove all css. I completely forget.
I need a, a;hover, a:visited, and a:active.
Blue, none, purle, red - the exact shades vary between browsers
Netscape 3:
a: #EE
hover: -
visted:
Why does Opera mini not render lists properly?
http://www.abc.net.au/parents/lists.htm
Opera 9 in small screen view shows lists correctly, but opera mini
doesn't indent or number/bullet the lists. (I only tested the simulator
http://www.opera.com/products/mobile/operamini/demo.dml.) Without
David Storey wrote:
On 15 Sep 2006, at 05:36, Geoff Pack wrote:
Why does Opera mini not render lists properly?
http://www.abc.net.au/parents/lists.htm
Opera 9 in small screen view shows lists correctly, but opera mini
doesn't indent or number/bullet the lists. (I only tested
David Storey wrote:
... It is also cheaper to surf on phones as all
processing is done server side and a compressed binary is sent
to the phone. Less data is sent to the phone and the phone
doesn't have to do and there is no complex processing on the
phone.
Does this mean the problem
I agree with your sentiments, but frames are not needed anymore - all
recent browsers will allow you to add the nav content via the object
tag. E.g.
object id=nav data=nav.html type=text/htmlFallback navigation
here.../object
Combine with 'position:fixed' ('position:absolute' for IE) on the
Franky, I admire the attempts to subvert an obviously broken publishing
system. Maybe you are fixing the wrong problem.
In terms of web standards, what is to stop the developers simply pasting
an iframe or an object tag into the table cell, and doing the same thing
with perfectly valid code?
Has anyone had any success using AlphaImageLoader with PNGs in CSS
background images in IE6?
Any foreground links over the PNG are broken (not clickable), and the
fixes I found through Google aren't doing the job.
Any ideas?
thanks,
Geoff
Teresa,
I think the problem here is that your anchor tags are empty, and without
display:block, there is nowhere to click, and so nowhere for the hover
effect to take place.
Note that there is also no page content - if you view the page with CSS
turned off the page is completely empty. No
One further thing I noticed. The URL of CSS behaviours (in IE) is
relative to the parent HTML page, not the CSS file.
e.g. http://abc.net.au/test/png/ has five files:
default.htm
styles/logo2.png
styles/screen.css
styles/background.jpg
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Erwin Heiser wrote:
!--[if gt IE 6]
link rel=stylesheet href=ie7.css media=screen ![endif]--
!--[if lte IE 6] link rel=stylesheet href=ie6.css
media=screen ![endif]--
Why not going with !--[if IE 7] rather than !--[if gt IE 6]
That way you don't have to
Rimantas wrote:
That's not minimal document. This one is:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
title./titlep.
Strictly speaking, the p is optional - you only need a title and some
content
The shortest document I could get to validate is:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//X//DTD
Yes. But I'm not sure if it's semantically correct.
-Original Message-
Barney Carroll wrote:
But is it accessible?
==
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may
Designer wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if we could get browsers to interpret ^ (or
something) as meaning 'div id=' (and something else for 'class=').
Then we could have, xml style code, such as:
^pageborder
^content
blah blah
/content
/pageborder
MUCH more readable, and
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
On the other hand, browser support is fairly restricted and can
be buggy, especially if you plan to use any DOM Scripting/Ajax
type stuff.
Well, yes, but it's a lot better than XHTML 2 support ;)
For real-world usage, you're better off doing the
transformation
30 matches
Mail list logo
