Re: [WSG] xhtm 1.1 and Ruby annotations

2006-11-30 Thread Scott Tankard
Yes, although I think a more to the point of his question is why such sites render even when served as xhtml. Tee, the problem is quite complicated and would take quite a few words to explain fully, however what follows are the bare basics. When viewing an xhtml page with an xhtml doctype

Re: [WSG] xhtm 1.1 and Ruby annotations

2006-11-30 Thread David Hucklesby
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:34:58 -0800, Scott Tankard wrote: [...] When viewing an xhtml page with an xhtml doctype and served as application/xhtml+xml mime type, the markup errors you described (in fact pretty much all markup errors) would give and ugly yellow 'parsing error' page in Firefox.

Re: [WSG] xhtm 1.1 and Ruby annotations

2006-08-12 Thread Nick Fitzsimons
Tee G. Peng wrote: And the boss is just too busy dealing with client and bring in more clients so that I can pay rent :) Standards are important, but rent is essential :-) -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ ** The

[WSG] xhtm 1.1 and Ruby annotations

2006-08-11 Thread Tee G. Peng
Thanks to Eugenio, I was reading the article from sitepoint forum. XHTML 1.1 deprecates the lang attribute (in favour of xml:lang) and also the name attribute for a and map tags. It also adds a number of elements for Ruby annotations. I have a question about XHTM 1.1, Ruby annotations and

Re: [WSG] xhtm 1.1 and Ruby annotations

2006-08-11 Thread Nick Fitzsimons
Tee G. Peng wrote: Thanks to Eugenio, I was reading the article from sitepoint forum. XHTML 1.1 deprecates the lang attribute (in favour of xml:lang) and also the name attribute for a and map tags. It also adds a number of elements for Ruby annotations. I have a question about XHTM 1.1,