[LMMS-devel] api for creating plugins

Hey guys this email is just to get some thoughts on the above. I think we should create an api or if one exists for plugins documenting what potentially the end user can create with some time and patience and a bit of learning how to code? -- Jonathan Aquilina

Re: [LMMS-devel] Think I've made enough instruments?

Nes update: Added some new functionality and some default presets -- Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I could have added the CSS, if I were an admin I can't edit that page. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p9069.html

Re: [LMMS-devel] Double name on presets

I think it's perfectly reasonable to just make the (sanitized) preset name the default suggestion for the filename in the save dialog. If the user wants to use a different name for whatever reason, I don't see any need to prevent that, since that's functionality that already exists. As for reserve

Re: [LMMS-devel] Double name on presets

There are also some reserved file names in Windows (such as "LPT1") which most regex tutorials don't cover. -- Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/rest

Re: [LMMS-devel] Double name on presets

> You had to make a system which removed the bad characters before saving the preset? Yes, this would be the general approach. http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/758861/Removing-characters-which-are-not-allowed-in-Windo -- T

Re: [LMMS-devel] Double name on presets

Well we didn't reach an agreement, but the only argument against: "Some people really like doing some file management things with file names so there might be a small amount of push back on this... i.e. zyn_preset_01.xpf = "Blast Off!". In this case, the preset name allows characters that are inv

Re: [LMMS-devel] Think I've made enough instruments?

I have now implemented vibrato for the nes instrument. NES didn't actually have a hardware vibrato, but it could be done by manually modulating the pitch, ie. periodically writing a changing value in the pitch register, so I implemented it like that. Interesting fact: when you combine vibrato wit

Re: [LMMS-devel] Double name on presets

Quoting Tres Finocchiaro : > Perhaps the functionality could be changed to stop saving the preset name. > > Some people really like doing some file management things with file names > so there might be a small amount of push back on this... i.e. > zyn_preset_01.xpf = "Blast Off!". In this case,

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Are we still looking for a new LMMS logo and new name?

2014-05-29 13:07 GMT+02:00 musikbear : > If > i remember correctly i think it was Lucas who sugested that LMMS simply was > /pronounced/ 'Ellements'. > Nope. Wasn't me. I don't have anything against a new name, if it's a good one. There was and is a lot of change in the project, we moved to Git

Re: [LMMS-devel] Double name on presets

Tres Finocchiaro wrote > In this case, the preset name allows > characters that are invalid on the file system. Ouch.. thats a hickup:/ -And a bad one. I have also been sligtly anoyed over that missing set-name in save-dialog, when i forgot to copy.. -because i definately want the project-presets

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Are we still looking for a new LMMS logo and new name?

looks like something been removed from the post, but in reprect to name - If i remember correctly i think it was Lucas who sugested that LMMS simply was /pronounced/ 'Ellements'. I have taken that idea with entusiasm :p, and use it in my stuf. It would be a *serious *error to rename LMMS. Its alrea

Re: [LMMS-devel] Things learned while working on the sampletrack branch

diiz wrote > and since we can just work on the > full sampletrack implementation for 1.2 in any case, it makes no sense > to do this stopgap measure, because we can just go for the full prize > all at once. Absolutely- If you believe the 'gold solution' (yours) could be in 1.2, then forget about