Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Thanks for the feedback Tobiasz. I changed it to blue per Vesa's recommendation, which I believe to be committed into his branch. If Vesa decides we should do another color, I'd happily whip up another rendering. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Tobiasz Karo

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

If anyone asks me, I prefer the Orange version. I really like the feel of this artwork. Great job! On 8 Feb 2014 00:29, "Bill Y." wrote: > This is the coolest info I didn't know. I just tested my newest mallets > artwork, and sure enough it works! > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Tobias Doer

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

This is the coolest info I didn't know. I just tested my newest mallets artwork, and sure enough it works! On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Just as a general example - IMHO there's no neccessity to change a > plugin's appearance. A plugin ships with whatever appearance it

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

> I think we need a sepseparate thread for this. Fair enough. Back on topic... Then. Here's the latest Audio File Processor GU (link)I: http://i.imgur.com/6tJ2HRJ.png -Tres -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Ap

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

I think we need a sepseparate thread for this. If everyone can provide me a list of pligins that you would like me to contact the maintainers and I shall gladly do so. On 7 Feb 2014 20:08, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > There have been breaking changes to AFP that should be fixed and Toby said > ear

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

There have been breaking changes to AFP that should be fixed and Toby said early in the conversation to contact the authors of those changes. I'm asking if you can get this communication to the developers? I'm not necessarily talking about newer versions, I'm talking about restoring something tha

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Im not saying pre 1.0.0 im wondering if all plugins should get a version bump for this release. Im sure newer versions would fix alot of interesting issues and improve overall performance. On 7 Feb 2014 17:57, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > Talking about fixing AFP prior to 1.0.0. so, yes, authors,

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Talking about fixing AFP prior to 1.0.0. so, yes, authors, I suppose. On Feb 7, 2014 11:07 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote: > Tres are you talking about plugin authors? > On 7 Feb 2014 16:17, "Tres Finocchiaro" > wrote: > >> I see. @Jonathan, are you in communication with these people? >> >> AF

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Tres are you talking about plugin authors? On 7 Feb 2014 16:17, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > I see. @Jonathan, are you in communication with these people? > > AFP went from awesome (0.4.15) to slightly less awesome (0.9.9.0) > > I can file a bug but IMHO this should be of high priority for 1.0.0

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Yes there were changes but you have to ask the people who possibly broke it ;-) Without wanting to blame somebody: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/commits/stable-0.4/plugins/audio_file_processor Toby -- Managing the Performa

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

I see. @Jonathan, are you in communication with these people? AFP went from awesome (0.4.15) to slightly less awesome (0.9.9.0) I can file a bug but IMHO this should be of high priority for 1.0.0 and I want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. :) -Tres --

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

@Toby, Slightly off-topic, but were there any changes to the AFP from 0.4.15 that never made it into the 0.9.9.0 RC? The knobs behave strangely in 0.9.9.0 rc when working with the waveform and should be fixed prior to 1.0.0. I don't remember having this problem in 0.4.15. To reproduce, simply t

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Just as a general example - IMHO there's no neccessity to change a plugin's appearance. A plugin ships with whatever appearance it has been given by its author (usually). But maybe things are different for LMMS' own plugins. If you look at https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/blob/stable-0.4/src/gui/embed.

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Since when FL Studio is limitating the flexibility of LMMS? :( 2014-02-07 Tobias Doerffel : > Can you change the appearance of VST plugins in FL Studio? :-) > > Toby > -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applicati

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Can you change the appearance of VST plugins in FL Studio? :-) Toby -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http:

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

I would love to have the chance of changing the design of the plugins, not adding this will make no theming sense 2014-02-07 Vesa : > On 02/07/2014 08:40 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Just a question. > > > > 1) Nice work Tres :) > > 2) will all instruments and plugins end up themable like th

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

> Eh, rather go with the blue. Blue versus Orange: -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doublecl

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/07/2014 08:40 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Just a question. > > 1) Nice work Tres :) > 2) will all instruments and plugins end up themable like the rest of LMMS? Probably not. I understand that the plugin graphics are statically embedded to the plugin binaries at compile time. Of course th

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

Just a question. 1) Nice work Tres :) 2) will all instruments and plugins end up themable like the rest of LMMS? On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Vesa wrote: > On 02/07/2014 06:43 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > Thanks for the tip. > > >> Read and answered. Go back a few posts... >> > > I b

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/07/2014 06:43 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Thanks for the tip. > > > Read and answered. Go back a few posts... > > > I believe you answered them, but it seems to have missed my inbox > , can you resend? Oops, no sorry, I forgot to send that mail... > I

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/07/2014 05:43 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Here is a functional rendering: > > @Vesa, > > Did you get a chance to read my questions about the icon? Read and answered. Go back a few posts... > > Also, I'm working on the buttons and I'm having a hard time getting > them to update on compile

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

I really liked these two. Especially the blue waveform on black/dark background. I think I, as Vesa, Liked the dark version the most. http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/attachment/5985/1/image.png http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/attachment/5985/0/image

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

I strongly feel the note icon is appropriate for this, but the Sample Track is using one that is too similar. I would argue that the AudioFileProcessor use that icon and the Sample Track use a waveform. This also provides consistency with the "samples" folder icon, since samples are much more fre

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/06/2014 10:29 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > I'd request changes to both the icon and the buttons. The buttons look > like Win 95 and the icon doesn't say something about what the plugin > does (except producing sound ;-) - any chance, you can take care of that? > > Thanks > > Toby > I'm sure

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

I'd request changes to both the icon and the buttons. The buttons look like Win 95 and the icon doesn't say something about what the plugin does (except producing sound ;-) - any chance, you can take care of that? Thanks Toby ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/06/2014 06:19 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > My first attempt at getting AFP updated: > > > > > Note that this isn't a mockup as the components are functional, this > is built on Ubuntu 12.04. > > @Vesa, > > The icon that is used in the song editor doesn't really fit the style > of the other i

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

"Anyway, if you want to try your hand in redoing the artwork for the Mallets plugin, feel free. I haven't really thought of it as a priority, since it's one of the lesser used plugins and IMO isn't very interesting at all as an instrument, but if you want a go at it, go ahead." Yes... I'll make ne

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/04/2014 09:15 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Sorry, this mockup never made it through (the quoted text put it over > the size limit). > > @Vesa, how hard would it be to keep the stock knobs on this screen? > I'm starting to like the way they look. Not hard at all. All it requires is to chang

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/04/2014 04:03 PM, Bill Y. wrote: > What is wrong with Organic? I love that fact it's got a little Organic > Carrot at the top. It's among the best looking already. Also I > disagree with the idea that each one should look unique. The only time > I've seen that in other DAW's is when it comes

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

What is wrong with Organic? I love that fact it's got a little Organic Carrot at the top. It's among the best looking already. Also I disagree with the idea that each one should look unique. The only time I've seen that in other DAW's is when it comes to the VST's because those come from outside, a

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

@Bill, Thanks for your feedback. Generally I feel the same way. I use Ableton as a comparison (again), but they have the equivalent of an AudioFileProcessor called "Simpler" and it integrates well into the Black/Gray Ableton theme. So well that it almost disappears into the software. The diffe

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/04/2014 03:02 PM, Bill Y. wrote: > I've been a bit hesitant to offer artistic feedback, because I'm new > to the project, but in my opinion fix things if they are broken or > could use improvement. If we look at the old plugins Audiofile > processor is thematically linked to Organica, Vestige

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

I've been a bit hesitant to offer artistic feedback, because I'm new to the project, but in my opinion fix things if they are broken or could use improvement. If we look at the old plugins Audiofile processor is thematically linked to Organica, Vestige, Kicker, Patman and the old Triple oscillator.

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

I actually really like the current one, but I feel obligated to create a new icon to differentiate from the sample track. I quickly drew that icon in Inkscape, which sparked the new one. I'll keep working at it... -Tres On Feb 4, 2014 12:14 AM, "Vesa" wrote: > On 02/04/2014 06:46 AM, Tres Fino

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

On 02/04/2014 06:46 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Started a new mockup tonight... Eh... to be honest, I think you had a better thing going in the previous one. It seemed more consistent thematically. The title was better in that one at least, and the wave graph - although I do like the background